Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Depression/dissapointment
In looking at depression and or dissapointment, when we engage in such feelings are we not ignoring the truth of inconstance and not-self? This could be about anything that we percieve as "I" It could be one's perception of, one's "I" making as a Buddhist practioner. This "I" is supposed to be and act in a certain fashion, when this does not comport with reality, this "I" we have given birth to suffers death and it is in this death of this fabricated "I" that we mourn. All depression all dissapointments is mourning that which never was. Just some random thinking.
All the best,
Todd
0
Comments
Also, let us assume here that we are not speaking about those with severe, diagnosed mental afflictions, but of people experiencing Life's standard ups-and-downs.....
But a little practice can help.
1. Our need for a "self" is incredibly high.
2. Our actions, depression, dissapointment, anger ect, are ingrained mental habits that we have used over and over again in similar situations. Initially these are protective responses that with time and habit become not only large habitual responses but become maladaptive responses to conditions.
All these things are simply actions to certain stimuli, that lead to consequences. Is it only by the slow process of meditation, mindfullness and the understanding of true emptiness that these maladaptive responses may be altered?
All the best,
Todd
Also, isn't reality quite constant?
All the best,
Todd
My Take On Why "Self" Exists and Why So Many People Have a Hard Time Dropping It:
Anyway, the reason we need this "self" is because it inclines us to survival and reproductive fitness(we're animals after all). If an animal were to accept its place and the things that occurred, then surely that animal would not survive long in a hostile environment.
For example, there are two people in a room and one piece of cake...mmm, cake. Anyway, they're both hungry. The person with the highest sense of self will get that cake and obviously survive and thus be able to procreate later on (let's say eating cakes opens a door XD). The man who sits and contemplates, "I need the cake. If I do not get cake then my life will end, but the cake is not mine to have. It would be best if we both ate some cake instead.", is going to lose out to the man who thinks "I need that cake; It's my cake to have! DELICIOUS CAKE! *quickly steals the cake* NOM NOM NOM"
The guy who took the cake for himself increased the likelihood of his survival while also eliminating reproductive competition. Kinda like why communism never works. Social systems always create a hierarchy. Wealth also distributes itself to one extreme (Think Pareto's 80-20 Rule. Here, 80% of wealth in less than 20% of the population)The alpha gets his fill, the omega gets the scraps. This sense of "self" helps to establish a high place in the social hierarchy. Although, it can also do the opposite it's sooo complicated @__@
The same with samsara. Its doing its thing, rising/falling, clinging/generating self. We can stop trying to build or erode the samsara, and just notice it is spinning like a coin in our body. This doesn't make it "us" though, it just spins... but won't it erode, like a mountain when no one carries new rocks up its paths? There is delusion in percieving that samsara is us, like some static quality. It seems closer to notice it as something we wear, like a shirt.
IMO all of this is just fabricated, we continuously "become" with our ideas and concepts of self. From this we fabricate all manner of non-sense, Samsara being one. Yishai has a good point as to why we generate ideas of self, as protective/defensive mecahanisms. All of our clinging, all of our becoming is predicated on stories, stories about selves, our lives, our ego , and our place in the world. If you think of it it is quite powerful; untold numbers of people have died because of stories, because of egos, because of ideas. There is no Samsara, as there is no Nibanna there is only now....until the next story.
It's interesting to note this identity I have created, the concept of myself, that I am so attached to is the product of my own imagination.
Seeing this tends to help one to not take themselves so seriously.
I don't agree with the power of stories. They don't have an unavoidable gravity, we have the habit of empowering them.
Well stated, I would have to agree. We think, and if we follow this line of thinking, then in the end we become. Would you say that certain conditions give rise to certain ways of thinking, this in turn (after feeling, craving and clinging) brings us to a state of becoming? Also that this mental track is repeated and repeated ad infinitum until that link is seen (using mindfulness)and is halted (the link being severed before becoming) and one chooses a more exalted course of action? So as an example:
I feel I work hard at my job, I am a leader at my work, I help to institute good policies. So I cling to these ideas of self in this particular role, I have thus become this "worker leader self". But naturally this "self" will be broken apart, it will be assailed, it's ideas might not be liked or given credit for. But I have become this self. So I will do , what most do, when they identify with a self I will mourn its loss. I will mourn the loss of certain concepts of me. It all seems so ridiculous. I have so many concepts of self, that of a father, son, husband, nurse, employee, team leader, Buddhist ect...What's driving me crazy is I realize the identification with any of these is tethered to suffering, yet I continue to identify with such ideas. I understand mindfulness and realizing not-self are the keys here, I just wish I could dump it all now. Thanks for listening.
However, they don't have to be a new "us" that arises. If they are "us", then when someone challenges the role, or the performance of the role (even as you reflect on your own performance) there arises clinging/avoidance and self cherishing. This decreases our skillfulness, as it uses our precious resources to maintain. "Look at how well I did" or "Look at how crappy I am at being a nurse" or "Is this how a father acts" and so forth.
As we dissolve the self, it could be noticed that those are simply roles we are called to perform, with unique momentary rules and conditions that we do our best to adhere to. We press our mind into the mold, like forging thought into language, but we don't exist as the mold, we are not trapped by language. In that way, rather than creating an image of self, and then enforcing that self in the role, we have a pliable mind we use to meet the need of the role. This cuts down on the silliness of being the 'nurse' and then being the 'husband' etc, like juggling many balls.
We are simply flexible enough to speak the correct language to the correct audience. Then, when we meet failure, we meet it with curiosity rather than condemnation. It isn't a failure of self, but a corner of the mold we didn't fill skillfully.. leaving us free to explore it. Also, when we walk away from the mold, there is nothing to cherish because it was a condition of nature's need, we didn't cling... it wasn't about us. We weren't there making ourselves more self-y, we were there doing our best to serve the need of the role. Self just doesn't come up.
As always a very reasoned and well thought response. It is always good to hear from you.
With deep respect,
Todd
Wonderful observation.
This concept of self is oh so real to so many yet when you look at this assumption of reality, it seems like a funny dream.
With warmth,
Matt
brian
may you find everlasting inner peace.
My best to you,
Todd