Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Namaste,
Who gets hurt when insulted? Physically, we can always say it's the body. But psychologically, who gets hurt (since there's no permanent entity called self)? And I read J Krishnamurti, and he says it's only the image that gets hurt.
BB
0
Comments
We call them negative emotions only because they make us feel 'bad'. But in reality there is no inherent negativity or badness. It's only our perception, which labels them so, because we would prefer to not feel those emotions.
In the 'conventional language' we will still stay and feel as if it was us or others, who were hurt, because that's how 99.9% of us experience the world - with the attachment to this body and mind.
If you're implying that the doctrine of no-self may somehow make psychological injury to other people all right in some way, don't. The conventional self is analogous to the body in this case by virtue of the fact that it lives in and interacts with the world, and we should be compassionate and non-hurtful according to the precept of non-harm.
I don't think Krishnamurti could be said to speak in any way for Buddhism. He doesn't claim to be Buddhist. Krishnamurti speaks for Krishnamurti.
If you can be mindful of it and just let things be as they are, then that which was born out from them can stay with them, and let it affect them only. Just like an engine that you let it just keep running, it only wears itself down, and uses up its own fuel and energy. Just like a spark that ignites a flame within them, we don't need to take that fire from them. Let it burn with them and if it goes out of proportion then it burns out where it starts and not onto you.
metta
If an insult is said in the forest and no one is there to hear it is it still hurtful?
or you can just accept right here and now.
both help in the long term and the immediate.
And cowherd boys came up and spat on me, urinated on me, threw dirt at me,
and poked sticks into my ears! While others, exultant & thrilled brought me
offerings of food, caskets of perfume & incense and garlands of flowers!
Yet I do not recall, that I ever showed any partiality towards any of them...
I was the same to them all! Neither arousing any fondness nor any aversion!
This was my ultimate perfection of equanimity..."
MN 12 Lomahamsanapariyaya
The Hair-raising Presentation Cariyapitaka III 15
A Buddha, by definition, has perfected equanimity and it is imperturbable, unshakable, immune to disturbances from anything
http://what-buddha-said.net/drops/Even_is_Equanimity.htm
I never said that Buddhism teaches people to be immune to insults and didn't mean to imply that it was some kind of practice. I was saying that the experience of full enlightenment causes a person to be immune to insults. Because a Buddha has full enlightment, a Buddha is immune to insults.
Thanks for the exchanges.
Just wanna say I'd first see myself as a human being. As humans, we are not immune to emotions. If I ever become a buddha, then so be it.
When Buddha was done talking the man went over immediately to apologize. Buddha looked at the man smiled and asked him, “If I give you a gift and you refuse to take it who does it belong to?”
The man thought for a moment and then said, “I guess the gift belongs to me.”
Buddha smiled and said, “I don’t accept your friend’s gifts. There is certainly no need for you to apologize.”