Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Hi
I have just finished the first draft of a new editing of the Dhammapada. It's an amalgamation of many translations and I have edited it to make something that is devoid of any mystical references whilst at the same time trying to present the core dharma concepts within the text; so as to have a text-booky kind of feel.
If anyone would like to have a read or a proof read drop me a PM.
Namaste
0
Comments
Will this be for general public distribution?
have you approached any authoritative bodies to seek clarification, approval or correction, where such might be necessary?
Otherwise, this would just be for your own personal gratification, wouldn't it?
Really, I'm interested, seriously.
I am also very open to criticism, hence's my post. I would prefer it if the criticism came after a reading, not before - that just somehow seems less skill-full to me. And less kind.
Accepting the full Dhamma, or the full Bible, or the full Koran, does not show much thought...and for me, Buddhism is all about thinking.
Do you think I need to be familiar with the original dhammapada in order to read yours? Will you be defining terms such as 'good' and 'evil' in your own understanding. The latter would make it easier for others to understand your perspective.
Mental concocting/fabricating is the supreme suffering
[The ending of mental conconting] Nibbana is the supreme happiness
Sankharam here does not mean "a thing" (noun), such as the five aggregates
It is a verb or doing word, meaning the mind cooking up all kinds of thoughts
It's more like wise sayings, I dont think there was a single author.
Namaste
____________________________
@vinlyn -- OK, but if Buddhism is all about thinking, that still leaves the question of what happens to Buddhism when you don't think about it. Does Buddhism somehow disappear when you long for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich? Does Buddhism require your thoughts? If so, that would mean Buddhism was somehow limited ... something along the lines of a book-bound religion. "For me," any of this might be fine. But what about "for real?"