Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Is it Bad Kamma to Be a Homeless Beggar?

edited September 2011 in Buddhism Basics
We have a guy who has been staying with us. By listening to his story, he has been placed homeless by his own negligence; however, during his walk of poverty and living from place to place, he has received SOME new awareness from his new path.

On the other hand, my children view him as a scheming vagrant who means to mouche off of people. This is mildly saddening, to me, and somewhat disappointing, even if they might be correct.

With no proposed intent to gossip or complain about him; admittedly, he really does sustain his self identity to be that of a self proclaimed martial arts instructor, has made very little effort to seek work (Which is throughout the period of over a month since he has been here.), and is not monastic in anyway (But he does claim to be a witch who masters swords.).

He seems to be rather intelligent, and in no way mentally ill. He just seems to be a pretentious 33 year old to me. My mind says that he can be taught, but my feelings are uncertain about his mind in the future; however, in being, his walk is witnessed to be that towards great awareness very soon if he does not let his thoughts interfere.

So, my heart has decided that he has much to realize about his true being and there is no way he will be able to receive help from me. He is being released tonight, wherever he has to go, when he arrives.

Still, my question is, is it bad kamma to be a homeless beggar even if one seems to be pretentious?

Comments

  • Allow me the revise the question. Is it bad kamma if one is a homeless beggar who is pretentious?
  • personperson Don't believe everything you think The liminal space Veteran
    I don't imagine that there's anything karmically wrong with being homeless. When someone becomes a buddhist monk its often referred to as entering the homeless life. Monks don't beg though, if someone is panhandling I suppose that would generate a similar karma, I'll leave any judgement as to whether thats bad or not up to you. Pretensiousness may make him annoying to some and it could probably be classified as a mental defilement but I don't think that it would make any difference to his karma if he's homeless or not.
  • it's fruitless and just speculation from our part to figure out whether or not someone else has bad or good karma based on their circumstance.

    one thing i've learned from buddhism is that there are no inherently existing people out there. there is just my interpretation which then i project onto people.

    just a thought.
  • it's fruitless and just speculation from our part to figure out whether or not someone else has bad or good karma based on their circumstance.
    :bowdown:
  • BhanteLuckyBhanteLucky Alternative lifestyle person in the South Island of New Zealand New Zealand Veteran
    @SimpleWitness his name isn't Carter is it? shaved head, english? recently this self-proclaimed homeless one (basically an English back packer who is travelling on the cheap) came to the monastery here in Wellington during the Rains Retreat and asked for a place to sleep. The abbot declined. He asked for a razor to have a shave. Declined.
    He asked for a flashlight so he could leave after dark. Declined.
    He asked for stuff and didn't seem to understand that the monks viewed him as a freeloading geezer.
    Finally to get rid of him they gave him some food and escorted him out.
    Unbelievably he returned the next morning and asked for a cup of tea, and filled his pockets with chocolate bars, before finally leaving.
    AND he came back again 4 weeks later, and was met with the same answer.

    This guy is definitely imposing on people, if not generating bad karma.
  • Homelessness is a result of karma, but to call a quality of being "bad karma" might miss the mark for you, SW.

    Consider simply recognizing that the dwelling where he resides (internally and externally) is a result of his choices and perceptions. Anything more in your mind may set up the conditions for applying labels to him. Said differently, be careful not to create a delusional perception of self in the man, as he has none.

    From your side, trust your observations and intuition about helping him. Enabling is a burden to both sides, while compassion helps to set the conditions for liberation.
  • Homelessness can be the fruition of past life karma, or it can simply be the lifestyle choice of someone who chooses not to work. Given the pretentiousness, "wandering saddhu" wouldn't fit. After having him in your home for a month, were you able to determine if he has a highschool degree?
  • DaltheJigsawDaltheJigsaw Mountain View Veteran
    How interesting!
  • Pretentiousness can be annoying at any rate. What does being homelessness have to do with that? I've met plenty well-to-do people who were pretentious...
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    "On the other hand, my children view him as a scheming vagrant who means to mouche off of people."

    Do your kids support themselves?
  • My question would be this. Why bring a scheming vagrant in to live with your kids? Is it safe?
  • My question would be this. Why bring a scheming vagrant in to live with your kids? Is it safe?
    This is what I was wondering, but I assumed that SimpleWitness had determined it was safe.

    Scheming vagrants know women tend to be kind-hearted pushovers, btw.

    haha! Good with the comic relief, MG!
  • simplewitness is a man I believe. But perhaps I will take up scheming vagrancy as a dating strategy.
  • This forum gets really funny in the late hours! ^_^

    Sorry, SimpleWitness, for the error. I think you did your best with your guest.
  • Mr_SerenityMr_Serenity Veteran
    edited September 2011
    I see so many homeless all over the place in Los Angeles. I honestly feel they should not beg. Being homeless is one thing, that can sometimes be out of your control. Begging is something else that I feel really may be the lazy way out. It's possible to be fed from EBT (footstamps), then its possible to get money by welfare. Then just with those starters as a foundation to keep you fed and not pennyless, it's possible to get temporary housing, or shelter, or use free internet at a library to look for jobs.

    One can visit temp agencies, post on craigslist every day looking for jobs. There are a lot of shitty jobs out there that are available. But they may be less shitty than being homeless on the street begging.

    That is why I don't give beggars money anymore. Sometimes on a rare occasion I will, it depends on their circumstances, but I've learned from experience usually it's not helpful to give them free money by them begging for it. Because they get used to it. It ends up becoming habitual, that will be all they know.

    Instead of making a sign begging for money. They should make a sign that says "Looking for work". That would be much more admirable.

    As a martial artist of many years I am embarrassed that he calls himself a martial arts instructor. To call yourself an instructor means you must be black belt level. Black belts are not just a piece of clothing to show how potent you are at fighting. They're also supposed to be a state of mind. A real black belt will not go on the street begging for money. Instead they will go looking for leads and information on how they improve their situation. They will learn how to make money so they do not have to beg.

    Adaptation to a unique situation is how to win a fight, he should know this if he is a martial arts instructor. Begging for money is the same as saying you cannot fight.

  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    So, are monks bad?
  • Mr_SerenityMr_Serenity Veteran
    edited September 2011
    So, are monks bad?
    Ive actually never seen a monk beg for food or money. I don't think I would respect them if they did it the way most homeless do. But for them to offer a service and then live on donations, or something like that, that is more respectable than begging. Because they're trading a service.
  • Bhikkhu Thanissaro and other monks making their rounds in San Diego...

    https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3228/2976746522_4b9c057043.jpg

    On another note, I have to say it astounds me to see how many people here (on a Buddhist forum of all places!) are unwilling or unable (?) to put themselves in the shoes of people who live in very different circumstances. Being homeless is not as simple as people make it out to be. And once in that pit, looking for a job is not as simple as people make it out to be either. There are a whole host of factors that contribute to one individual's situation-- its not just down to someone "being lazy."
  • Asking about bad karma to be homeless is exactly the same as asking if it's bad karma to own a mansion. The Buddha was a homeless beggar, but so was the Railway Serial Killer.

    I have known homeless people in my time and who knows, I might end up that way myself. Some are homeless because of addictions and mental problems, some because they are so invested in selfpity and blaming others that they refuse to do what is necessary to earn money, and some simply had bad things happen to them, but they remained compassionate people who would share their only sandwitch with another hungry beggar.

    Who and what a person is can be seen from their actions. Letting someone invested in taking without giving freeload off you is not doing them any good or you, for that matter. But neither is judging the poor to be unworthy or defective because they don't have a place to live. They are only poor.

  • So, my heart has decided that he has much to realize about his true being and there is no way he will be able to receive help from me. He is being released tonight, wherever he has to go, when he arrives.

    Still, my question is, is it bad kamma to be a homeless beggar even if one seems to be pretentious?
    I think you've done the right thing. I know and have known many homeless people in Alcoholics Anonymous, and the one thing that made them seek internal change was pain. In A.A.s literature, it says 'Pain is the touchstone of spiritual growth'.

    And by unwisely helping someone, we can delay their 'rock bottom' (and you don't have to be an alcoholic to have a rock bottom; it's a mental position where you've suffered enough and seek change) and not do them any favours in the long term.

    I also think you've been extremely kind and brave letting a homeless person into your home.

    As for 'bad kamma' to be a homeless; then that's a 'no'. Kamma (or karma) is a complex subject (so complex it's said that only buddhas understand its full implications), but in essence karma comes into play when our feelings become involved and there is some volition or intention from our side. And since we're constantly 'feeling' (it's an always present mental factor), we are constantly producing karma while we are conscious.

    So being homeless does not in itself produce 'bad karma'; karma is the cause of this guy being homeless; karma is a cause, not a result. I'm not even sure if karma can be called bad; I'm just looking through my course book now and can't see it described as such.

    It says here:

    "When we create an action of body, speech, or mind, the conscious of subconscious volition [intention] that causes that action also creates a potential that is deposited in the mental continuum, the stream of consciousness. When the appropriate conditions arise, this potential becomes manifest as a positive or negative result. Again, it is the mental action itself that is karma, and not the ripening result."

    I hope that helps!


    :D
  • ... to call a quality of being "bad karma" might miss the mark for you, SW.

    .... be careful not to create a delusional perception of self in the man, as he has none.

    .
    Hellos @aMatt
    Most of what you said to me made sense and is totally understood.

    But, what do you mean by the above statements in you previous comment?

    Metta
  • I don't imagine that there's anything karmically wrong with being homeless. When someone becomes a buddhist monk its often referred to as entering the homeless life. Monks don't beg though, if someone is panhandling I suppose that would generate a similar karma, I'll leave any judgement as to whether thats bad or not up to you. Pretensiousness may make him annoying to some and it could probably be classified as a mental defilement but I don't think that it would make any difference to his karma if he's homeless or not.
    @person

    In all honesty, my goal is to preclude judgment of good or bad in every view. My knowledge is limited to the doctrines of kamma; so, the term "bad kamma" was used because of the way it was presented to my understanding years ago by the wider religious world. Perhaps my usage of the term "bad kamma" is flawed. My apologies if it was.

    Metta
  • it's fruitless and just speculation from our part to figure out whether or not someone else has bad or good karma based on their circumstance.

    one thing i've learned from buddhism is that there are no inherently existing people out there. there is just my interpretation which then i project onto people.

    just a thought.
    My gratitude @Taiyaki
    Your thought is right. My thought was that of duality. His actions, or lack of, may have placed him there. My actions are burdening him and my family. This is all that can be witnessed. So, he has been released to flourish else where.

    Metta
  • Homelessness can be the fruition of past life karma, or it can simply be the lifestyle choice of someone who chooses not to work. Given the pretentiousness, "wandering saddhu" wouldn't fit. After having him in your home for a month, were you able to determine if he has a highschool degree?
    @Dakini

    Well, he was inquired and he claimed that he did. Also, his back ground was checked. He has a clean record. In addition, he has no kids. Even upon having inquired about his character in the last place he stayed turns out that he was harmless with them, in terms of his demeanor. Moreover upon asking him to tell us his story, he told us and seems to own up to his negligence to certain things as to what made him homeless. He just seemed be getting too comfortable. He's out now, though.

    My decision was to get him a job across the street at the department store and let him go.

    Metta
  • My question would be this. Why bring a scheming vagrant in to live with your kids? Is it safe?
    @robot

    Well my kids are all teenagers, now, and have a thing or two to learn about the conscious decisive actions of kindness and compassion, along with me. We all must learn about this here. We also have lessons to learn about hospitality. Taking him in did take a process. It was not arbitrarily done.

    Metta

  • How interesting!
    @LeonBasin

    It is a blessing. Agreed.

    Metta

  • @Mr_Serenity

    Thank you for confirming that.

    :)
  • Asking about bad karma to be homeless is exactly the same as asking if it's bad karma to own a mansion. The Buddha was a homeless beggar, but so was the Railway Serial Killer.

    I have known homeless people in my time and who knows, I might end up that way myself. Some are homeless because of addictions and mental problems, some because they are so invested in selfpity and blaming others that they refuse to do what is necessary to earn money, and some simply had bad things happen to them, but they remained compassionate people who would share their only sandwitch with another hungry beggar.

    Who and what a person is can be seen from their actions. Letting someone invested in taking without giving freeload off you is not doing them any good or you, for that matter. But neither is judging the poor to be unworthy or defective because they don't have a place to live. They are only poor.
    Gratitude @Cinorjer

    This is a touching and compassionate view to take. My sentiments exactly.

    Metta


  • Cinorjer's posts are always so great!
    SimpleWitness, this has been a fascinating story, with a great ending. Do you think he'll keep the job? How did you convince the dept. store to hire him? Will his job earn him enough money for him to pay rent somewhere? Not your problem, I guess. You did your best.
  • aMattaMatt Veteran
    edited September 2011
    ... to call a quality of being "bad karma" might miss the mark for you, SW.

    .... be careful not to create a delusional perception of self in the man, as he has none.

    .
    Hellos @aMatt
    Most of what you said to me made sense and is totally understood.

    But, what do you mean by the above statements in you previous comment?

    Metta
    The first statement, perhaps you could notice that karma simply supports the cycle in the present moment. Some might think its helpful to collapse those conditions into "good" and "bad" qualities, but its also possible to simply witness the expressing conditions of stress.

    The second is just another representation... there is no need for the mind to collapse observations into the delusion of permanent qualities. There is not a lasting, permanent quality of homelessness or home-ness, pretentiousness or humility.

    To be seeing a "pretentious homeless man" means the mind observing has probably collapsed into dualism, ascribing static qualities where there is none. The appearance of a solid quality of pretentiousness, for instance, projects from the observer's side, rather than the "pretentious man", and causes the mind of the observer to feel distressed by the observation. Its skillful to be alert to these kinds of perceptions when we face situations that perplex and entangle us.

    There is the case where a certain person fabricates an injurious bodily fabrication, fabricates an injurious verbal fabrication, fabricates an injurious mental fabrication. Having fabricated an injurious bodily fabrication, having fabricated an injurious verbal fabrication, having fabricated an injurious mental fabrication, he rearises in an injurious world. On rearising in an injurious world, he is there touched by injurious contacts. Touched by injurious contacts, he experiences feelings that are exclusively painful.
    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.235.than.html

    The painful feeling (such as difficulty in seeing a man caught up in a cycle of poverty and doing nothing to help himself) gives rise to further fabrications.

    Again, it is possible to simply notice the momentum of the cycle. This sets the conditions for its evaporation, or cessation.
  • It is bad kamma not to show compassion. Which doesn't mean you let this guy free-load off you - it may mean you have to show him his marching orders, but it does mean you must not despise him. He is where he is in his life. You have no way of knowing if it's for good or ill. In fact, unless you are him and can get inside his mind, you can only guess at his intentions and his history.

    Stop worrying about his kamma and concern yourself with your own.
  • It strikes me that SimpleWitness doesn't need to worry about his own karma, in this instance, or even in general. Because he acted spontaneously, motivated by purely by compassion (rather than by a selfish concern about his own future karma), but also applied wisdom in thoroughly checking his guest out to make sure the family would be safe, and eventually applied "tough love" mixed with more compassion--sending the fellow on his way, but finding him a job--SimpleWitness did nothing to generate any negative karmic burden, nor does he seem like the type who would, much. This is an extraordinary story.

    Do you mind if I ask where you live, SimpleWitness? Where did this story take place?
  • ... to call a quality of being "bad karma" might miss the mark for you, SW.

    .... be careful not to create a delusional perception of self in the man, as he has none.

    .
    Hellos @aMatt
    Most of what you said to me made sense and is totally understood.

    But, what do you mean by the above statements in you previous comment?

    Metta
    The first statement, perhaps you could notice that karma simply supports the cycle in the present moment. Some might think its helpful to collapse those conditions into "good" and "bad" qualities, but its also possible to simply witness the expressing conditions of stress.

    The second is just another representation... there is no need for the mind to collapse observations into the delusion of permanent qualities. There is not a lasting, permanent quality of homelessness or home-ness, pretentiousness or humility.

    To be seeing a "pretentious homeless man" means the mind observing has probably collapsed into dualism, ascribing static qualities where there is none. The appearance of a solid quality of pretentiousness, for instance, projects from the observer's side, rather than the "pretentious man", and causes the mind of the observer to feel distressed by the observation. Its skillful to be alert to these kinds of perceptions when we face situations that perplex and entangle us.

    There is the case where a certain person fabricates an injurious bodily fabrication, fabricates an injurious verbal fabrication, fabricates an injurious mental fabrication. Having fabricated an injurious bodily fabrication, having fabricated an injurious verbal fabrication, having fabricated an injurious mental fabrication, he rearises in an injurious world. On rearising in an injurious world, he is there touched by injurious contacts. Touched by injurious contacts, he experiences feelings that are exclusively painful.
    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.235.than.html

    The painful feeling (such as difficulty in seeing a man caught up in a cycle of poverty and doing nothing to help himself) gives rise to further fabrications.

    Again, it is possible to simply notice the momentum of the cycle. This sets the conditions for its evaporation, or cessation.
    Gratitude @aMatt
    Yes! Got it. Understood. My discipline is made to strive towards simplicity as a source of being. My thoughts were of duality. This complicates things, doesn't it?

    Though, this does not mean that it is mastered within me, yet. If at all, it is the lack of simplicity that is witnessed within me. However, it is beginning to be seen clearer now. Thank you for being another jewel with me on the path, aMatt.

    Metta, buddy! :D
  • It is bad kamma not to show compassion. Which doesn't mean you let this guy free-load off you - it may mean you have to show him his marching orders, but it does mean you must not despise him. He is where he is in his life. You have no way of knowing if it's for good or ill. In fact, unless you are him and can get inside his mind, you can only guess at his intentions and his history.

    Stop worrying about his kamma and concern yourself with your own.
    Gratitude @Ada_B

    My thoughts will keep mindful to this. Well said.

    Metta

  • So, my heart has decided that he has much to realize about his true being and there is no way he will be able to receive help from me. He is being released tonight, wherever he has to go, when he arrives.

    Still, my question is, is it bad kamma to be a homeless beggar even if one seems to be pretentious?
    I think you've done the right thing. I know and have known many homeless people in Alcoholics Anonymous, and the one thing that made them seek internal change was pain. In A.A.s literature, it says 'Pain is the touchstone of spiritual growth'.

    And by unwisely helping someone, we can delay their 'rock bottom' (and you don't have to be an alcoholic to have a rock bottom; it's a mental position where you've suffered enough and seek change) and not do them any favours in the long term.

    I also think you've been extremely kind and brave letting a homeless person into your home.

    As for 'bad kamma' to be a homeless; then that's a 'no'. Kamma (or karma) is a complex subject (so complex it's said that only buddhas understand its full implications), but in essence karma comes into play when our feelings become involved and there is some volition or intention from our side. And since we're constantly 'feeling' (it's an always present mental factor), we are constantly producing karma while we are conscious.

    So being homeless does not in itself produce 'bad karma'; karma is the cause of this guy being homeless; karma is a cause, not a result. I'm not even sure if karma can be called bad; I'm just looking through my course book now and can't see it described as such.

    It says here:

    "When we create an action of body, speech, or mind, the conscious of subconscious volition [intention] that causes that action also creates a potential that is deposited in the mental continuum, the stream of consciousness. When the appropriate conditions arise, this potential becomes manifest as a positive or negative result. Again, it is the mental action itself that is karma, and not the ripening result."

    I hope that helps!


    :D
    Gratitude @Tosh

    Yes, Tosh. This helps greatly. In fact I copied and pasted it to my memo as a reminder. ;)

    Metta
  • If you act appropriately as a beggar with survival and peace and cultivation of your mind then you transform the negative circumstances into positive karma.
  • If you act appropriately as a beggar with survival and peace and cultivation of your mind then you transform the negative circumstances into positive karma.
    My comprehension to this is, wits with humility. Hmmmm. This guy is blessed!
Sign In or Register to comment.