Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
One of my guilty pleasures is the long-running TV show NCIS, a drama focused on the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. The hero is a former marine, now Special Agent Jethro Gibbs, a disciplined detective with an uncanny ability to observe and question criminal suspects. Gibbs doesn’t say much or display a lot of emotion in the interrogation room—indeed, his cool demeanor is his trademark—yet he is a keen lie spotter.
Psychological scientists are fascinated by real-life versions of the fictional Gibbs. Detecting lies and liars is essential to effective policing and prosecution of criminals, but it is maddeningly difficult. Most of us can correctly spot barely more than half of all lies and truths through listening and observation—meaning we are wrong almost as often as we are right. And half a century of research has done little to polish this unimpressive track record.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-burden-of-lying
0
Comments
One example is sometimes when a person falsly answers a question in the affirmative but in reality the answer is negative they'll say yes but shake their head no. The first time I saw this in an interview after reading about it I was amazed at how obvious it was. It was some interview about the financial crisis and the guys answer was one of those fairly obvious statements that cover up what really happened but has plausible deniability, he was shaking his head no the whole time he was talking, it was kind of funny actually.