Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Is Yoga an important part of buddhism?
(or being hindu possibly?...)
0
Comments
I would say that in terms of the yoga as most see it here in the West, it has little if anything to do with Buddhism, though others may find some parallels.
In some Buddhist traditions however, there are some aspects of working with the subtle body (energy, channels, etc., which I think is something that some types of yoga may involve.
The buddhist 8fold path and the yogic 8fold path are nearly identical as far as their structure and composition. The only real major difference I've found is yoga's emphasis on personalizing the 'divine' and the Buddhas emphasis on NOT personalizing it.
Imo, the Buddha took Patanjali's system and perfected it through his own genius. He cut out what was confusing and non-essential, clarified what was remaining, and added some things that were missing... Making it more simple, more clear and easier to practice and apply.
Don't forget, the Buddha was a yogi!
I think a more accurate translation of "yoga", especially in the usage of the word in the above post is "union". In Guru yoga, for example, I don't think one is submitting to the Guru as much is one is trying to merge their own body, speech and mind with the enlightened qualities of the Guru to achieve an inseparable union.
So to relate this to the original question, if one looks at yoga as meaning "union", then this is the real essence of the practice...not the western form of "stretching" we have seen become such a fad in the last number of years
I know for a fact that Tarthang Tulku has termas relating to asanas and yogic breathing and the like.
In his introduction to the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, Swami Svatmarama states the the express purpose of the physical asanas, breath control, and sensory deprivation that are all a part of this system is to get the practitioner to Raja Yoga (meditation). They would agree with Buddhists that the highest form of union/yoking (YUG is the root Sanskrit word) occurs during deep meditation. Physical yoga is intended to make meditation more effective.
Specifically, these physical practices is to make it easier to meditate on the winds, drops, and channels (the subtle energy system of the subtle body that Tibetans, as well has the Hindus whose system they borrowed in part, believe contain the most subtle states of mind (within the heart chakra).
The practices are said to help repair damaged channels, get the winds flowing properly through the channels, and help move the various airs of the subtle body from side channels to the central channel, which is where yogis, who practice in this method need to be able to visualize and work with them in order to obtain very subtle states of mind. Physical yoga (asana practice) has been described as a kind of outer practice akin to a plumber banging on your pipes to free them of deposits. You still need to be able to meditate at the highest level to make use of any of the benefits conferred by yoga (unless you just want to be more relaxed, less stressed, more limber, more energetic, or enjoy other samsaric ephemeral benefits ---they're not too bad, though, either).
Of course the Chinese have practiced various forms of movement, such as Tai Chi or other martial arts, in conjunction with, or as an adjunct to their meditation practices for many years. I don't know if this is done at all in any Theravada system; perhaps they use some breathing exercises; I've meditated with a Theravada practitioner; he used the 9 round breathing method that I was also taught by a teacher in the Tibetan tradition.
one book I read recently had an entire chapter dedicated to the basic buddhist pranayam but went on to say that the concept of prana and pranic body is somewhat outside of the 'dhamma propper'
That's why it is just a compensation. So one in one out. Good action bad action, gain and loos.
Just being needs no action
being is just the natural state of the stateless.
all action is merely the expression of being and being, being the total expression of all action. whether walking or sitting, there is no difference.
Substitute "acceptance of what is before judgement and subsequent attachment and aversion."
To arrive at this understanding is where the Buddha's teaching come in handy.