Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Would you consider yourself a Buddha?
Comments
http://www.intrex.net/chzg/Pat2.htm
@Dandelion -- Who but the awakened could make such a statement without being a liar?
The awakened. So, the awakened and myself can both say we are not awakened and not be liars - i'm at least in good company with those that are awakened, if only for one brief sentence!!
one can say there is only buddha. for that is the non dual assertion prior to inference of a subject.
all things lack a permanent essence, are impermanent, thus totally unsatisfying. not only that everything appears and disappears with no where, here, or why. everything spontaneously is self aware, ungraspable, interdependent, and vividly luminous.
so what does that all mean? if you sit in meditation, everything changes. try it.
but the comment about mara is correct as well. we are all born stupid. this original ignorance is infinite, in that we all have the inherent stupidity to assert duality, grasp, and to assert inherency.
thus the path is the purify and to awaken. to awaken is to see all things are already perfect. to purify is to work in relationship with that which prevents the correct seeing.
so no i don't consider myself a buddha. but there is only buddha.
Always be compassionate to yourself.
Naturally you'll let go and accept reality.
Since Buddha is "one who is awake" I think we must wake up to realize our Buddha nature.
So we are Buddha and we are not yet Buddha.
The Zen teacher had a good sentiment whose words I cannot remember exactly. Roughly they were:
"Stop running around pestering others."
My ego really liked that, and that's a little more humble than being a Buddha, don't you think?
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn22/sn22.058.than.html
http://www.ted.com/talks/view/lang/en//id/130