Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Psychadelic use

edited December 2011 in Philosophy
I know Buddha says to refrain from intoxicants, because they hurt you. Can this be interpreted as total abstinence, or choosing the middle path where with something like Psilocybin mushrooms or LSD use that is proven to not be harmful is okay when I use it to meditate, think deeply, and enjoy the world around me.

I am curious about what other people think, because I am just now learning more about the Buddhist teachings, and am trying to be a more peaceful and serene person, and feel that these teachings embody what I already thought, so there for I feel like I was a Buddhist fledgling in a sense already, but just never aware.

Comments

  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited December 2011
    I think some of those hallucinogens could be a spiritual experience if you set your mind up correctly. In other words a party is not spirituality. You can't dress up goat shit in beautiful wrapping paper and expect it to smell or be good.

    So in the beginning if you use them with pure intention to have a good heart for all beings they could be part of your path. The spirit of ahimsa or non-harming and the wish for all beings to share in good feelings.

    In previous discussions some people have come to the consensus that some drug experiences can open the door a crack, but then you have to learn to get back to that place without a crutch. Saying a crutch is not to belittle but it makes the point in a less dry weight than to say "conditioned phenomenon is not a reliable refuge".
  • ThailandTomThailandTom Veteran
    edited December 2011
    This has come up so many times. I use to use all kinds of drugs including LSD and DMT. Yes, they do offer sometimes realizations about life, but they also can induce a true and powerful 10 hour trip of horror. I have been there too. The point of the dharma in this sense is to keep a clear mind as to gain enlightenment you have all of the tools needed within - your mind. There is no need for LSD or drugs. Sure, they can be fun and an amazing experience, but it is not buddhist and that is that IMO.
  • VastmindVastmind Memphis, TN Veteran
    Your middle path is just that. Yours. Every Buddhist is practicing. Awareness is confirmation of truth. IMO...Your on the right path. It will evolve...habits will drop....you do better when you know better.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited December 2011
    For one of these experiences to be valuable in the context of buddhism it is important not to cling to the experience. There are three lords of materialism and the third and most difficult to overcome is the lord of the mind. Which what it is... it's basicly attachment to states of mind. Trying to doctor up your mind. It never works out how we wish and eventually we see the suffering in the lord of the mind.
  • There have been many threads on this subject. To clarify, the precept concerning intoxicants is not, in my opinion, for the purpose of a healthy body, but rather for a clear mind.

    When you use a hallucinogen you are tricking your mind and contaminating your thoughts using chemicals quite foreign to your body in that volume. This is the opposite of mindfulness.

    This type of meditation is counter to practice because it yields results that wear off as quickly as the drugs that produced them. Drink plenty of water, sit on something comfortable in a quiet place.

    Read a book called "mindfulness in plain English"

    I lend this book out to so many people. It is one of the best introductions to meditation I have ever read.

    If you are going to meditate, then meditate. And I recommend that you do. No drugs required.


  • VastmindVastmind Memphis, TN Veteran
    @frequency86...I agree
  • I'll third that nomination, agreed
  • I'm in.
  • Same, it is a better way of putting it than I did in some respects.
  • As someone who has been on both sides of this issue, I must say that the natural mind is more in keeping with finding the path the Buddha described.
  • Again, same.
  • edited December 2011
    I agree about having a healthy mind, but forms of hallucenigens allow your mind to let go of barriers and filters that are put there by its self, and once I let go of those barriers I can see the truth of some things easier. I am not saying this can't be achieved without them, but I am using it more as a tool, and I can sit with my plants and feel their energy and love.

    This is not something I do every day, but when I am having a difficult time with something in my head and have exhausted many possibilities I find that a dose of psychadelics will allow me to see it in another light, and I come out with more understanding which gives me peace of mind that I can keep forever.

    I don't agree that the state of mind wears off when the drugs do, because I take something away from each trip that stays with me forever, and nothing can take that away.

    I love all of your inputs. They are all great and welcome.

    edit: I am not saying being under the influence all the time is a tool, but more of a burden. I am talking about using them sparingly and as strong spiritual tool that can gain profound insight.
  • frequency86frequency86 Explorer
    edited December 2011
    A hallucination is a product of your perception that is chemically distorted. It is a lie. I have used hallucinogens in the past. I am quite familiar with their effects.

    I must question if forcefully toppling "barriers" and removing "filters" using chemicals is desirable or wise. Whether it works or not.

    All of these things can be achieved through meditation with patience.
  • Our whole perception is just that perceptions, so why would that be any more of a lie than what my brain is already doing? Our brain is full of chemicals distorting our reality all the time.

    I agree that I am sure meditation can achieve great things, but I am human and there for I use tools, so why wouldn't I use a tool for my mind?

    What you see and what I see completely sober can be two different things, but yet neither would be a lie, because that is our perception.
  • No matter what you say, dkmonk already has their mind set. Arguing and trying to convince dkmonk to not do it is a futile.
  • The truth isn't propriety of Buddhism or any other tool or path or experience.

    A near death experience can potentially get you a long way in terms of insight. Still that doesn't mean most people willingly seek life-threatening experiences to gain such an insight. There's a reason for that. There's a risk involved.

    We don't all join monasteries and turn into monks in order to get to the truth faster or more eagerly. There's a risk involved.

    The Buddha supposedly tried a lot of extreme techniques and asceticism before becoming enlightened. Yet he didn't include those in the teachings of Buddhism. It was risky and apparently not needed in order to attain enlightenment.

  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited December 2011
    Psychedelic use is frowned upon by Buddhist masters. There is a reason for that. Those teachers are very, very smart. :)
  • I think dkmonk has already decided and is looking for validation.

    You want permission to use psychadelic drugs? Go for it - you're your own person and you're responsible for your own choices. Trying to dress it up as enlightenment is a stretch, though.
  • I wanted to question and see what your guys thoughts were. I am not looking for someone to tell me it is bad or it is good just your ideas, and I respond back with my point of view. I already know in my heart that they aren't bad, but I wanted to see what the Buddhist point of view.

    I am not trying to argue, but only to have a peaceful sharing of ideas. I am sorry I came off that way.
  • Its no accident that most western meditation and buddhist teacher have done mind altering drugs.

    It may show another path for the intellectual clinger.

    Other than that it becomes another form of masturbation.
  • So, what would masturbation be considered? It is a want and desire, and you need to control those wants, but it is also a pleasure of life, and very natural.

    Also, what did Buddha smoke? I was reading that he condoned smoking, but I highly doubt it was anything like today's cigarettes.

    I have so many questions and it is so hard to find all the answers I seek. I have been watching documentaries and absorbing all this information, but I have nobody to ask all these questions that fill my head, and I know that it is very okay to question things, because that is encouraged.
  • Its like you learn about everyhing and you have highenes awareness. Yet you come down and it just becomes another experience.

    So you start to chase the experience and this creates divide between life and experience.

    Meditation allows the same insights but it goes slower thus full integration in all aspects is manifested. But meditation can also be a form of masturbation as well.

    So it is best to see all of this as merely rafts that point and show. Without integration it is just another toy or vacation from life.

    Get what i mean?
  • But thats how most westerns are. Always looking for the exotic. Something new or different.

    I did it for a while. Lsd, shrooms, etc. it taught me what it had to teach then i moved on. I got serious with buddhism. Ultimately i am thankful but i realize that it could have become an addiction and i have seen how these drugs ruin peoples life.

    It isn't an experience that changes you but rather the insight gained from such experiences.

    Thus it is meanful up to a point. Whatever our motivation or intent is we must see clearly what is happening.

    If we are not honest and sincere then meditation, drugs, really anything becomes another way to avoid reality and ourselves.
  • I think I do understand. If you are not using meditation with a purpose to better yourself, find inner peace and/or clear your mind, but rather as a way to get away from your problems then it is defeating the purpose.

    In regards to your exotic comment that I think you may be referring to. I didn't go searching out Buddhism I feel that it came to me, and I don't claim to be a Buddhist yet, because I am just now learning about it and making a decision on how it fits me personally. I am not one to emerge myself in unknown waters with a blindfold.
  • Even bettering yourself, clearing the mind, find inner peace. These at first are our aspirations and intention for meditation.

    Even this while it seems good is another form of holding that we need to let go of. Its a great start but eventually it is all let go as well.

    So you can see the habitual form of clinging can manifest in the subtlest ways. Even the letting go is clinging haha.

    Its all about learning to live in composure with reality as it is.

    Hope buddhism has something for you.
  • With meditation you will find that there is no need for external substances. The peace you seek is within not without...
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited December 2011
    I wanted to question and see what your guys thoughts were. I am not looking for someone to tell me it is bad or it is good just your ideas, and I respond back with my point of view. I already know in my heart that they aren't bad, but I wanted to see what the Buddhist point of view.....
    ....And we already know in our hearts that you are mistaken, because the Buddhist point of view discourages and advises against it.
    Whilst practising Buddhism advocates using experience and personal scrutiny, examination and discovering things for yourself, it doesn't mean you can cherry-pick the bits you like and dismiss the bits you don't. No matter what you think you know in your heart.
    that particular organ isn't the one affected. Your mind is. And that's where common sense should lie...

    Buddhism isn't geared to fitting anyone.The question is, it takes a lot of work and dedication, but you have to fit Buddhism.
    So, what would masturbation be considered? It is a want and desire, and you need to control those wants, but it is also a pleasure of life, and very natural.
    for monastics it is discouraged as it denotes an attachment to physical pleasures and their distractions.
    Laypeople must decide for themselves what they see as appropriate or not. Everything in moderation. Including moderation.
    Also, what did Buddha smoke? I was reading that he condoned smoking....
    Really? news to me.... where did you read that?
    I have so many questions and it is so hard to find all the answers I seek. ... and I know that it is very okay to question things, because that is encouraged.
    Yes, but when the answers come back overwhelmingly in one direction, the questioning can stop, and the work then begins.

  • @dkmonk

    i think if you end up experimenting with both psychedelics and meditation like myself, and many others have... what you will find out is that these experiences are drastically different with minor qualities that are similar. kind of like comparing a cookie and an apple, both or which are sweet. to think you are accelerating the meditation process, as practiced in Buddhism, by using psychedelics is imo an error.

    i would suggest you read what Ram Das has to say on the subject. Ram Das, in case you're not familiar, was a partner-in-crime with Timothy Leary (the 'father' of LSD) and also a Yogi. He took the meditation + psychedelic experience to [I believe] the maximum extent it can be taken.
Sign In or Register to comment.