Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Does the Buddha Explain Ghosts, as in Haunted Houses?
When I was about 10 years old we lived in a house where strange things would happen. This is the only time this has ever happened to me or my family. And recently, I read about a dozen, or so, reports of a haunting a block from where I lived.
Did the Buddha address ghosts, such as might haunt a certain location and move objects? Does Buddhism make sense of such claims? I know some may say, "Don't worry about it! That's not important." I hope I don't get a bunch of responses like that.
0
Comments
Normally they couldnt be seen, although people in specific mental states were attributed to being Pretas, and since Preta is often translated to a name meaning 'starving ghost' as the closest translation, it's possibly the only thing Buddhist I can think of that even comes close to the concept of ghosts and wandering spirits.
Hope that helped somewhat.
http://www.blia.org/english/publications/booklet/pages/02.htm
Amida, you should talk to Sagat, whose house was (is?) haunted. Really interesting stories. My theory is that the shut-in who died in the house before his family got it was still hanging around. He hasn't seen her for awhile, though. Maybe she finally moved on to where deceased spirits are supposed to go.
Could be that ghosts are people in the Bardo state who are attached to place, and can't let go. A friend of mine who didn't believe in such things was shocked to see her mother hanging around, after the mom had passed away. After 6 months of visitations, she finally called her siblings and asked them if they'd noticed anything unusual since mom passed away. All of them had seen her. They all live in different states.
Yes, Buddhism teaches about the ghost realm, and also a heaven realm.
Until they start to haunt you.
These are the things that I was really refering to.
I looked up Q's book reference on Amazon. The full title: The Imprisoned Splendour: an approach to Reality, based upon the significance of data drawn from the fields of Natural Science, Psychical Research and Mystical Experience. According to one review, the author discusses all this data, then in the final section of the book, ties it all together to use it as an explanation of karma and reincarnation. No info on what his science background is, though.
He drew his basic understanding of existence from the writings of another British writer, the philosopher Douglas Fawcett, and elaborated upon them by means of his own studies.
Johnson's book contains references to things that since have been shown to be scientific errors (like the Piltdown Man, which was a hoax), as if they were factual. However, that hoax was exposed after his book was published, so he was not to blame for that. Also, later research has shown that the salient remarks that he made about the formation of snow crystals (for example) were mistaken. At the time that he wrote about this matter, he could not have known this, so he was not to blame for this error, either. From someone linked with Johnson, I have learned that the scientific chapters, in the book mentioned, need substantial revision (the march of science, I suppose).
Despite all this, the book contains such a wealth of information about psychic research, parapsychology, spiritualistic phenomena, particle physics etc., etc., that to miss reading it would be a shame. He also wrote Watcher On the Hills, Nurslings of Immortality, and at least one more, the title of which escapes me. If ever there was a man that deserved to meet a good Buddhist teacher, Johnson was he.
I hope that you find all this helpful.
You may enjoy the book "Entangled Minds", that discusses all the major psi research that's been done. Author's a physicist.
Well spirits of the dead, as related to the deceased, hallow's eve, rites for the dead ancestors and so forth--that doesn't relate to the pretas or preta world (pettivisaya). However, sometimes people do see pretas. Pretas do not look like humans in nice clothes and so forth, they are terrible unfortunate looking creatures, very similar to a hellish existence (niraya world). In rarer cases, some people have perceived devas and mistaken them for ghosts. That being said, most of the peoples' experience of ghosts is simply derived from the magikal-spiritual energy of a person that is left behind, and has a lot more to do with the people who knew that person than the sentient being themselves.
None of this is guessing on my part, I've been studying this deeply for many years.
I hope I was helpful.
"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of the passing away & reappearance of beings. I saw — by means of the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human — beings passing away & re-appearing, and I discerned how they are inferior & superior, beautiful & ugly, fortunate & unfortunate in accordance with their kamma:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.004.than.html
http://www.palikanon.com/english/pali_names/t/tirokudda_s.htm