Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Is there a full English version of the Buddhist canon?
If there is, where/how can I obtain it? Is there a digital version?
If not, is there any institution working on it?
0
Comments
i can point you to this website which is about as comprehensive a collection of suttas, teachings and translations as you ate ever likely to find...
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/index.html
This site you kindly posted is great but does not have the complete Tripiṭaka, although it's being fed from time to time.
Why not email them and ask them?
If anyone would know, they'd probably be more informed than most....
Also, send a private message here on newbuddhist to member "samahita" as he is a Theravadan Monk. Perhaps he can point you in the right direction. Much of the TiPiţaka is on his website: http://what-buddha-said.net/index.htm
its called pali text society.
www.palitext.com/
The word 'canon' within Christianity means 'authority'. It is only from the Christian 'canon' that doctrine may be extracted.
I know of no such generalized 'authority' within Buddhism.
Having said that there are any number of texts which carry greater weight than others - but much depends on the tradition, the sect and the school.
The Tripitaka is the doctrinal foundation of Theravada Buddhism, and the sutras preserved in the Tripitaka are pretty much acknowledged by all schools of Buddhism to be those of the historical Buddha.
A canon is an authorized set of scriptures for a particular religion. The key word missing from the history of Buddhist writings is "authority". Buddhism had its councils, but we never had an authority with the power and aim to define proper and heretical Buddhism and enforce one set of sutras and doctrine. So canon is actually a poor word choice to define what sutras are "authentic".
There is no doubt about that.
And the Tripitaka is not regarded as a canon due to athority of who wrote it dow, differing it from the Christian Canon. On the contrary the Tripitaka is regarded as the Buddhist canon because it was historicaly writen by people who had the oportunity to hear the Buddha teachings by close, in most of the cases.
http://www.wisdompubs.org/Pages/c_teachings.lasso
Some Online sources:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/index.html
http://metta.lk/tipitaka/index.html
Some book sources:
http://www.palitext.com/
http://www.pariyatti.org/Bookstore/catalog.cfm?step=1&CatPos=155
http://what-buddha-said.net/drops/Index.Dhamma.Drops1.htm
Enjoy your study and the Increasing Distinction of Discrimination!
If glad-2-get Early Buddhism by e-mail, then
click 'Subscribe to this Google group' here:
http://What-Buddha-Said.net/index.htm
Have a Nice, Noble and Easy day!
Bhikkhu Samahita :-) _/\_
Thanks for all these contributions.
You are amazing, all you from Newbuddhist.com.
We're a mixed bunch, but we try our best.....