Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Marriage

edited April 2012 in Buddhism Today
What are your guys' thoughts on marriage?

What does Buddhism have to say about it? And in "Buddhist culture," how is marriage seen?

Comments

  • personperson Don't believe everything you think The liminal space Veteran
    Sorry, this just popped into my mind. :crazy:

  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    What do you mean, what does Buddhism have to say about it? The Buddha said husband and wife should be supportive of each other. Remember, he lived in another era, so he said the husband brings home the bacon to support his wife, and she returns her love by caring for him. That kind of thing.

    How is marriage seen in Buddhist culture? Still not sure what you're fishing for, here. Same as in any other culture. Could you clarify your questions? Or does this answer them?
  • How is marriage seen in Buddhist culture? Still not sure what you're fishing for, here.
    Here in America, we put great importance on the "nuclear" family. Is it the same way in countries where Buddhism is extremely prevalent?
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    What are your guys' thoughts on marriage?
    I think it's over-romanticised and over-rated.
    What does Buddhism have to say about it?
    check it out for yourself....
    And in "Buddhist culture," how is marriage seen?
    Depends.
    Which culture are you talking about?
    Tibetan?
    Zen?
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited April 2012
    My best friend and I will have our 22nd anniversary this year.. I love her more than ever.... and like her too. We have been through a lot... together. :thumbsup:

  • Could be heaven or hell... Choose wisely
  • I personally think it is pointless. If you love someone enough, there is no real need to do such a thing. However if I could I would not make it something people were not able to do, I just don't see any point in it.
  • . However if I could I would not make it something people were not able to do,....
    That's generous, Tom . :D

  • zombiegirlzombiegirl beating the drum of the lifeless in a dry wasteland Veteran
    @person That's exactly what I thought of too! My girlfriend and I have determined if and when we do get married, we must force whoever is performing the ceremony to start like that.

    But having said that, I would like to get married... but can't. Cuz I'm gay. Yep.
    Of course my girlfriend and I are happy together without the legality, I just feel that it would be a very important mile marker for equality. It would be nice to be recognized like all of the rest of my family and friends and it really does make our relationship feel less important sometimes. At least, in the eyes of some family and society in general. There sometimes seems to be this stigma about marriage that unless you are engaged/married, then you haven't found "the one" (I don't really feel this way, but I have certainly met others that do). I guess, I would like to tell everyone that I have found "the one" in a very concrete official way... you know... just like everyone else.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    You can get married.

    just come to the UK... :)
  • zombiegirlzombiegirl beating the drum of the lifeless in a dry wasteland Veteran
    You can get married.

    just come to the UK... :)
    Yeah, I know. We could also drive an hour to get married in Canada (or in other states)... but it's sort of the principle. It won't make a difference back home, you know? In that respect, we could also have a "commitment ceremony". But for me personally, I don't want to feel like it is anything less than the heterosexual counterpart. My girlfriend and I set a ten year limit. If it doesn't become legal in ten, then we're going to give up and do it anyways... in some form or another. We're nearly halfway there now, lol.

    On a side note, my girlfriend told me the other day that she thought of the perfect way to propose to me. I informed her that she wasn't supposed to tell me that before she does it... :p
  • I am married,have been since 1977 but only agreed to the ceremony because my partner's parents were devout catholics (or thought they were, the jury is out on that one) and he thought it was the right thing to do. But, I have spent most of my adult life with the same person because I choose to not because a piece of paper dictates so. I don't believe that marital status has a part to play in budhhism. Treating a partner with respect and dignity is much more important than marital status.
  • robotrobot Veteran
    I was never married during my twenty year relationship. I thought "why should I have to beg someone to marry me. It should be something that is agreed upon after discussion". Also, I thought that my commitment would be proven through hard work for and dedication to my family.
    This approach did not really work for me. My partner went along to get along, but I'm sure that she sometimes thought that I didn't ask her to marry me because she was not my first choice. It wasn't fair to her and she never forgot that I didn't value her enough to put the question to her.

    I have and will continue to tell my son that if he loves a girl he should ask her to marry him. Show her that it is important to him that she accepts him and thinks that he is the kind of man she wants for a partner. Put himself out there and make it a moment that she will not forget.
    After that they can discuss whether it is right for them or not. Maybe it's not so important. But he has shown his intent and is not taking anything for granted.

  • misecmisc1misecmisc1 I am a Hindu India Veteran
    edited April 2012
    if you have view that life can be lived without suffering, then get married and after that, your view will change. :D
  • I've been married to the same wonderful woman for over twenty years now, going for the next twenty if our health holds out. So yeah, I have a few thoughts on the subject.

    You see, my first marriage was to my high school sweetheart, lasted 9 years, and was a disaster. Eight of those nine years we spent fighting. It took me 8 years just to recover before I was ready for another relationship, and during that time I threw myself into Zen Buddhism.

    So the second time I did it right. I met a woman who found me funny and interesting and sexy and I felt the same about her. And we've danced our little dance of marriage ever since.

    What was my secret? What lesson did I learn between the first and second? Not a thing. I had no more clue the second time than the first how to pick a perfect woman for me. I didn't try. I just fell in love and went for it. I won the lottery. I got lucky. Let nobody tell you there's some great secret that you can learn.

    Zen taught me to wash the dishes if she cooks the meals, kiss her when I get the chance, go to work, come home, do more kissing and do it all again the next day, and if it lasts for a day or twenty years or fifty, you will be happy for as long as it lasts.

  • misecmisc1misecmisc1 I am a Hindu India Veteran
    My view: there is no point in getting married - the reason being without marriage also there are too many fetters to break in life - so adding extra fetters(by doing marriage) to already existing fetters, does not seem sensible.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    Yes, but when you ARE married , do not look upon it as a disadvantage, a fetter or a setback:
    It is what it is. You have chosen this.
    So make the most of it.

    Never look upon marriage as being a hindrance.
    Having a family and being married, are two great blessing for the layperson.
    some ordained monks, depending on the tradition, sacrifice this particular connectedness.
    They give this up.
    They deny themselves this process, as a means of practising detachment.
    but it is a sacrifice, to their calling, just the same,

    There is much joy to be found within a family, with children. there is great bliss in sharing a life with people with whom you are emotionally and physically connected.
    This, in and of itself - IS your practice.
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    there is great bliss in sharing a life with people with whom you are emotionally and physically connected.
    This, in and of itself - IS your practice.
    Quite literally so, in the Tibetan tradition, where experiencing the "great bliss" is considered the "quick path" to Enlightenment. Monks have "spiritual marriages" with consorts in order to experience the "great bliss" that comes from divine union of wisdom and "upaya" or method (skillful means/compassion). Remember, Zen allows monks to marry, too.

  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    I don't think misecmisc1 follows Tibetan Buddhism... so really, that specific aspect won't be relevant to him.....

    :)
  • CinorjerCinorjer Veteran
    edited May 2012
    My view: there is no point in getting married - the reason being without marriage also there are too many fetters to break in life - so adding extra fetters(by doing marriage) to already existing fetters, does not seem sensible.
    If you see formal vows as a prison or fetters, it's probably best not to get into a committed relationship in your case. My Uncle used to say "The woman I marry isn't born yet and her parents are dead!" and then got married when he finally fell in love.

    Would you agree that the exact same situation seen from a different perspective is replacing "fetters" with commitment and sense of responsibility? Not taking that final step to formalize your partnership usually shows a lack of commitment. People are much more likely to find reasons to break up when all they are doing is shacking up instead of being married.

    I have known many couples shacking up who eventually split up because it was easier to just walk away than deal with problems. And, all relationships will have problems because people always have problems. You bring them with you into the relationship.

    Doesn't mean marriage is always the wise choise. But, there's a reason gay couples in the US are fighting for the right to be married, instead of just living together.

  • Well I won't be getting married and so I won't have to view it as a hindrence, I view it as pointless. If my partner wanted to get married and I said no, if she were to leave me because of this decision then what would that suggest...
  • CinorjerCinorjer Veteran
    Well I won't be getting married and so I won't have to view it as a hindrence, I view it as pointless. If my partner wanted to get married and I said no, if she were to leave me because of this decision then what would that suggest...
    That she wants more out of a relationship? If you let a relationship go rather than make the commitment that's so important to her, especially if it's pointless in your mind, what does that say about your feelings toward her, in return? See how it's always a two way street. But who knows? Maybe marriage would be a mistake in your case. That's between you are her.
  • I find the idea of marriage very frivolous now. When I was a Christian, I thought that marriage and love would be beautiful and we would be together forever in death. But now that I'm a devote lay buddhist, I don't see how having a temporary companion in this life will mean anything. You most likely had a love interest in a past human/animal life and you both died and were reborn. Once rejoined in Nirvana, each of the beings would have lived many lives with many loves. The traditional idea of romantic love can't exist in this case.
  • @LostLight

    I can't remember which sutra it is in, but I know there is one where Buddha talks about a way for lay people to be reborn and end up getting married in their next life. I can't remember which sutra, I'll try and look it up if you want. I know it's the Pali Cannon.
  • I find the idea of marriage very frivolous now. When I was a Christian, I thought that marriage and love would be beautiful and we would be together forever in death. But now that I'm a devote lay buddhist, I don't see how having a temporary companion in this life will mean anything. You most likely had a love interest in a past human/animal life and you both died and were reborn. Once rejoined in Nirvana, each of the beings would have lived many lives with many loves. The traditional idea of romantic love can't exist in this case.
    Really? I always thought the concept of someone being reunited in Heaven with their loved one, forever in death, to be rather silly. People do marry multiple times for some very valid reasons, and because you love someone doesn't mean they feel the same about you. So you're forcing someone to spend eternity with you because you love them, but they don't love you? And, while I love my Grandmother dearly, After a few days we would run out of things to talk about. Do you sit and stare at your loved ones for eternity? See, it's just silly.

    The notion that there is one person, and one person only, that you are destined to fall in love with certainly needs to be examined. That's like saying there is only one person in the world you can learn to dance with.
  • Thanks @Cinorjer for your tale of love, @Federica, and you basically all for sharing.

  • I find the idea of marriage very frivolous now. When I was a Christian, I thought that marriage and love would be beautiful and we would be together forever in death. But now that I'm a devote lay buddhist, I don't see how having a temporary companion in this life will mean anything. You most likely had a love interest in a past human/animal life and you both died and were reborn. Once rejoined in Nirvana, each of the beings would have lived many lives with many loves. The traditional idea of romantic love can't exist in this case.
    Really? I always thought the concept of someone being reunited in Heaven with their loved one, forever in death, to be rather silly. People do marry multiple times for some very valid reasons, and because you love someone doesn't mean they feel the same about you. So you're forcing someone to spend eternity with you because you love them, but they don't love you? And, while I love my Grandmother dearly, After a few days we would run out of things to talk about. Do you sit and stare at your loved ones for eternity? See, it's just silly.

    The notion that there is one person, and one person only, that you are destined to fall in love with certainly needs to be examined. That's like saying there is only one person in the world you can learn to dance with.
    So marriage is basically a means to either create offspring or fulfill a sexual craving? That's what you're making it seem like to me, and I won't disagree.
    Also when it came to heaven, the belief was that it was basically the same as life on earth, except you don't die. You wouldn't just be sitting in a room with a few people for all eternity. But there's no point in discussing fairy tales.
  • CinorjerCinorjer Veteran
    edited June 2012
    @lostlight I'm just talking about the concept of love as something that can only strike once, and only between the two people in the entire world destined for each other. I'm saying that's not reality.

    There is nothing in life that is not impermanent, and that includes love. This comes from myself, a person who writes romantic stories and sent pages of romantic, slurpy love poems to the woman who became my wife. Our love for each other is a great triumph in our lives, but when this life together is over, it must be left behind, along with the mistakes and regrets. It means I cherish her while we are dancing while knowing the song has to end, sometime.

    Sorry, waxed poetical a bit. Talking about romance does that to me.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    We must be careful not to confuse Romance with Sentimentality.
    Romanticism is generated in a more healthy, pure and sacred way.
    Sentimentality can be clinging, and affectedly or extravagantly emotional, and stems from or can be colored by emotion rather than reason or realism.
  • @lostlight I'm just talking about the concept of love as something that can only strike once, and only between the two people in the entire world destined for each other. I'm saying that's not reality.

    There is nothing in life that is not impermanent, and that includes love. This comes from myself, a person who writes romantic stories and sent pages of romantic, slurpy love poems to the woman who became my wife. Our love for each other is a great triumph in our lives, but when this life together is over, it must be left behind, along with the mistakes and regrets. It means I cherish her while we are dancing while knowing the song has to end, sometime.

    Sorry, waxed poetical a bit. Talking about romance does that to me.
    Gosh

    :)

    (hug icon)
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited June 2012
    I don't think misecmisc1 follows Tibetan Buddhism... so really, that specific aspect won't be relevant to him.....

    :)
    Actually, I was posting in part to Bekenze, since he's interested in traditions that allow marriage, and his OP asked how Buddhism views marriage. Partly I was riffing on the "great bliss" you mentioned. Wasn't posting to misecmisc.

  • howhow Veteran Veteran
    The nicest thing I heard a Roshi say about marriage was that it was a commitment by two people to each allow the other to be the best they can be.

    It is a refrain that has often helpfully guided my directions within a relationship.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    @Dakini, Gotcha, sorry. Thanks!

    @how, that's nice.
    When the 'like' button comes back, I'll "like" it!
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    The nicest thing I heard a Roshi say about marriage was that it was a commitment by two people to each allow the other to be the best they can be.

    It is a refrain that has often helpfully guided my directions within a relationship.
    This is great.
    "Like" :)

    Is there hope that the "like" button will return?

  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    Read my post. ;) i said 'when', not 'if'. Lincoln assures me he's working on it. :thumbsup:
Sign In or Register to comment.