Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

My own personal thoughts on attachment.

ZaylZayl Veteran
edited May 2012 in Buddhism Basics
Now if any of you know me at all, you know that I appreciate things of beauty and things of entertainment. I know many say that it is best to avoid these things. Whether they be music, intoxicants, art, or what have you. But this is just what I think. I feel that it is alright to enjoy them, so long as you do not let them control you. I can get by without any of them (with the exception of my nicotine addiction, I am working on that.) So I feel I am not attached to them per se. But they exist, and they are things we humans find pleasurable or otherwise enjoyable. If I never saw any of them ever again... I am sure I could get by just fine, as if I had never indulged in them in the first place.

Do you feel this is proper practice? I am not a monk of course, and I feel no need to be any more since I feel I would not make a very good monk. I wanted to be one, but it was for all of the wrong reasons, so I let that thought go. So now I sit here, a tad drunk but not too much. All I feel is peace, despite what I go through in life. I approach everything I do with my critical thinking skills. So I recognize everything I enjoy in life as technically insignificant in the grand scheme of things. Yet I do them anyway, because why not? If you can keep yourself from suffering in their absence. Then is that not good enough?

Comments

  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    Yes, you got that right.... so where's the problem?
  • CinorjerCinorjer Veteran
    It does cause a problem when we read about how Buddha told monks they were not allowed to watch plays, dance, listen to music, hold casual conversations, etc. Sure, you can say only monks have to live by those rules (let's pretend monks actually do live by those rules, shall we?), but then only monks are supposed to be living a life capable of being enlightened.

    So if a monk's life is designed to adhere to the 8-fold path and eliminate anything that blocks enlightenment, then all that beauty and entertainment must be bad for anyone. Yet, all this is an important part of our human experience. How can a normal life be somehow bad for us? Does this mean if we're serious about becoming a Buddha we have to throw away our television and radios?



  • patbbpatbb Veteran
    edited May 2012
    Now if any of you know me at all, you know that I appreciate things of beauty and things of entertainment. I know many say that it is best to avoid these things. Whether they be music, intoxicants, art, or what have you. But this is just what I think. I feel that it is alright to enjoy them, so long as you do not let them control you. I can get by without any of them (with the exception of my nicotine addiction, I am working on that.) So I feel I am not attached to them per se. But they exist, and they are things we humans find pleasurable or otherwise enjoyable. If I never saw any of them ever again... I am sure I could get by just fine, as if I had never indulged in them in the first place.

    Do you feel this is proper practice? I am not a monk of course, and I feel no need to be any more since I feel I would not make a very good monk. I wanted to be one, but it was for all of the wrong reasons, so I let that thought go. So now I sit here, a tad drunk but not too much. All I feel is peace, despite what I go through in life. I approach everything I do with my critical thinking skills. So I recognize everything I enjoy in life as technically insignificant in the grand scheme of things. Yet I do them anyway, because why not? If you can keep yourself from suffering in their absence. Then is that not good enough?
    this is great in theory, but in practice it is more often then not very difficult.

    If it all could be a conscious choice for everyone, weather to create attachments or not, the world would be a peaceful place.

    But it isn't. The body create these attachments all by itself, our subconscious mind trying to do its job and help us out by remembering things, reactions to our environment.

    Someone who has developed his mind can actually see the very subtle automatic reactions, in the form of their physical sensations in the body.
    Which is not available to most people, who could have a nice giant collection of tiny little attachments, which all together have a tremendous limiting effect on ones life, without ever suspecting it...
    Perhaps you fit the first description, I have no idea what kind of practice you have been doing in your life.

    But something that seem very consistent for people who have realized a few things through spiritual practice is that they usually, naturally lose alot of their interests in the kind of attachments that you speak of.
    Without the craving, all of a sudden alot of this stuff lose it's appeal.

    Have you tried a retreat, perhaps even a 10 days or couple weeks retreat?

    If you did, never mind but if you never, perhaps this could be a good test for you.
    Nothing better than to be miles away from our usual stuff to realize attachments we had no idea we ever had.
    (ie its easy to say Im not hooked on whatever, just enjoying it because its available, i'd be fine without it; it might be an interesting experiment to test our self and see weather it is true or not.)
  • I personally think it is down to the individual. There are some things I can experience in life and not be attached to, right at this point in my life music for example. I don't think that the point of the dharma is to escape aspects of life, rather to understand them for what they are and understand that some things can induce attachment.

    I know I tend to have this side to my personality which is kind of self destructive and likes to do some things to the extreme, I need to try and keep guard but it is hard. I dare not imagine what I would be like if I was living in the UK still, I would be easily exposed to so many intoxicants that I use to indulge and drown myself in. If I were to take some ecstasy it would not be 1 or 2 pills, it would be 8 or 10, if I wanted to take acid I would take 6 drops and so forth. I seemed to take things to the extreme.

    So I think personally this whole discussion about attachment and lay life boils down to the individual. Unless you happen to be sat here now in robes, it is your decision on what you see, listen to, eat etc, if there is no attachment involved then that is a good starting point. However, there are other negative aspects to such things as being intoxicated than just attachment. Being intoxicated can obscure a right view and result in bad decision making.
Sign In or Register to comment.