Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

get serious!

genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
edited May 2012 in General Banter
Maybe it's fair to say that everyone is serious about whatever they're serious about. Even those who claim "not to take things too seriously" can be pretty serious about it.

My guess is that it is good to take things seriously -- to open the heart and mind to one thing or another, to really dig in. Mediocre effort brings mediocre results.

But there is an interesting fly in the 'seriousness' ointment: It may be OK to be serious, but expecting others to be serious about what I am serious about, to seek out their agreement or approval as a way of elevating my sense of seriousness, doesn't work well. Yes, we may sit in the same meditation hall. Yes, we may encourage and support each other. Yes, we may each be quite serious. But does that imply that the matter at hand somehow IS -- in some universal or chiseled-in-stone sense -- serious?

Maybe it's OK to be serious.

But it's not that serious, do you think?

Comments

  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    genkaku, that's true. But I find some belittling of Buddhism in society also but I am very sensitive. For example saying that meditation causes someone to be a mental masturbator, I've actually felt that was how people viewed it. Navel gazing.
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    @Jeffrey -- I hear you loud and clear.

    Once upon a time, a long time ago, I used to arrive early at the Zen center I attended and, because the doors were not yet unlocked, I would sit on the stoop and watch the New Yorkers headed off to or returning from work. And I would be flabbergasted in some part of my mind that they could be doing something other than waiting with me to go inside and practice zazen or seated meditation.

    And then there were the times when people would comment on the navel-gazing, mental masturbation aspects of meditation. Their comments would sometimes sting because I was not yet entirely sure they were wrong. They were calling me out and I was not yet settled or assured enough to counter their criticisms, which I dearly wanted to do. I wanted someone or something to tell me with an assurance I could credit that the whole exercise was not a crock of shit.

    As regards Buddhism, I think the only answer to such criticisms and the doubts they can raise is to keep on practicing. I'd say it's worth the price of admission. But that's just me. I think a bunch of drivers speeding around a NASCAR track, endlessly turning left, is serious only to the extent that someone might get killed, but I can see that others might take it quite seriously indeed.

    I am serious about some things and not serious about others, just like you.

    But is it that serious -- serious enough to demand agreement?

    Your life, your call.

    My life, mine.
  • In order to be part of a religious tradition like Zen it's essential to agree, or it is no longer a tradition, right?
  • I have gained a realization recently which has been there in my face for a while but I did not properly recognize it. If someone has an opinion about something, they will have this instinct that it is correct and they will defend it sometimes with a furious nature. Obviously if 99% of people are this way their opinons cannot all be right but they will defend it anyway, in a very SERIOUS manner. This is why I stay out of a lot of discussions lately because people will jump in from all angles and they are convinced they are right if they are or not. In extreme situations this can turn bloody, I have learnt to stay away from such situations. Just thought I would throw this in there, maybe it is not so apt by there you go.
  • You can only be correct when being correct doesn't matter to you. Otherwise you can say the right words and still be wrong.
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    In order to be part of a religious tradition like Zen it's essential to agree, or it is no longer a tradition, right?
    @ozen -- In a superficial sense, you are probably right.

    But also....

    1. Is Zen a religion? Etymologically, as I understand it, "religion" depicts a connection ... as between man and gods ... or at least that is one aspect of its roots. A "connection" by its very nature requires a separation. To the best of my knowledge, Zen, like life, is not in the separation business any more than it is in the connection business.

    2. Is the tradition of Zen something that demands agreement or disagreement? I breathe in, I breathe out. You breathe in, you breathe out. I may like you quite a lot, but I would be a fool to rely on you for my breathing.

    3. Everyone starts a spiritual effort with belief and hope ... the belief and hope that partake of habitual and long-credited separations... man and god, old and young, joy and sorrow, smart and dumb, etc. But over time and with practice, belief and hope begin to take a back seat to plain old experience. No one who knows how to ride a bicycle gets on believing or hoping they can ride. They know they can ride ... so they just ride. Of course when they are beginning to learn, they believe and hope they can do what they see their friends already doing ... and they fall off ... and they get back up...and they fall off ... and they shed tears ... and they issue swear words ... and they begin again... and ... then one day they just ride.
  • middle path.
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    middle path.
    @iamthezenmaster -- As the Zen teacher whose name I have forgotten replied when asked what the "middle way" meant: "It means the extremes."

  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited May 2012

    1. Is Zen a religion? Etymologically, as I understand it, "religion" depicts a connection ... as between man and gods ... or at least that is one aspect of its roots. A "connection" by its very nature requires a separation. To the best of my knowledge, Zen, like life, is not in the separation business any more than it is in the connection business.
    Zen is in the reconnecting business. It doesn't matter if it is reconnecting with your own bones that you were never disconnected from in the first place.... and that disconnection is impossible. The the sense of exile is real.. the suffering is real.... the bubble hells are real. Call it a placebo religion.

  • middle path.
    @iamthezenmaster -- As the Zen teacher whose name I have forgotten replied when asked what the "middle way" meant: "It means the extremes."

    I've always been labelled black/white :)

  • I may like you quite a lot, but I would be a fool to rely on you for my breathing.
    And I would be a fool to try breathing for you.
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    The the sense of exile is real.. the suffering is real....
    @RichardH -- Yes indeed... it can be enough to make a strong (wo)man weep.

    And too, no kidding around or Buddhist flim-flam: If something is missing and you don't know what it is, is anything missing? Or, put another way, if something is missing and you do know what it is, how could it possibly be missing?
  • genkaku's back :D
  • Invincible_summerInvincible_summer Heavy Metal Dhamma We(s)t coast, Canada Veteran
    The the sense of exile is real.. the suffering is real....
    @RichardH -- Yes indeed... it can be enough to make a strong (wo)man weep.

    And too, no kidding around or Buddhist flim-flam: If something is missing and you don't know what it is, is anything missing? Or, put another way, if something is missing and you do know what it is, how could it possibly be missing?
    My mind has been blown.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited June 2012


    And too, no kidding around or Buddhist flim-flam: If something is missing and you don't know what it is, is anything missing?
    No... all you know is that something ain't right... and in your heart of hearts you know it is time to investigate.
    Or, put another way, if something is missing and you do know what it is, how could it possibly be missing?
    same as above.


  • Floating_AbuFloating_Abu Veteran
    edited June 2012

    And too, no kidding around or Buddhist flim-flam: If something is missing and you don't know what it is, is anything missing? Or, put another way, if something is missing and you do know what it is, how could it possibly be missing?
    Because it isn't -- but it sure as hell can feel that way.

    Abu
Sign In or Register to comment.