Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
What Makes You Not A Buddhist ... A Precis Of Dzongkar Khyentse Rinpoche
What makes you not a Buddhist according to Dzongskar Khyentse Rinpoche is;
Believing that anything has permanence
Believing that anything has a separate intrinsic existence.
Believing that any emotion can be free from pain.
Believing that Buddhadharma can be expressed by means of concepts.
3
Comments
believing you are a Buddhist does make you a Buddhist also.
HHmmm. If non Buddha is a label, who's left when you wash it off??
That one of those tricky shortcuts to end of the path, isn't it?
_/\_
Of course what I have provided is a precis...The Rinpoches teaching can be explored in his book " What Makes You Not A Buddhist "..Strongly recommended. And which uses concepts to point to the way to bypass concepts.
Hmm, sounds good... maybe.
I know a bunch of Buddhists who "believe" the above list, but they believe blindly, with blind faith, because that's what they were taught. They've got very little actual experiential knowledge of the facts of what they believe.
There is just one flaw with this scenario...when Enlightenment happens.." we" wont be there at all..."
The full quote is " We see ourselves at some time in the future as Englightened ....etc.
The message that something lies beyond concepts is itself a concept. As for the other points, I'd have to read the book to see what he meant. For instance, my restatement of the third point would go further and say "Believing any life can or should be free from pain" because as he puts it, it seems like emotions are the problem.
Which are at the heart of the Vajrayana and Dzogchen.
All componded things are impermanent.
No intrinsic existence can be found.
All sentient existence is characterised by pain at all levels.
The original nature of the mind is Peace.
There are various alternative translations.
I'll tell you why.
'The original nature of the mind' ???
Oh shit mister! The few dharma debates I have
attempted to get into around here, centers around
this very theory. Original nature? Uh oh!
I'm not saying it. You know what you are....hahaha
Concepts? Once again....vocab just depends
on one's education. Even if at the very least...
concept can be describing using labels. No?
Seriously though,
I'm interested in hearing this explained, and
the teachings that go with it. I think I'm
going to like it. Thanks for sharing.
Disclosure: I got it a couple of years ago,
but haven't read it yet.
Something peculiar is that the title of this book in Spanish is " Tu también puedes ser budista", that is " You also can be a Buddhist".