Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Extreme risk-taking = non-attachment?
I just saw
this photo page of Mustang Wanted, a really, really gutsy Ukranian guy who likes to climb up tall things and hang off them for fun.
I was just thinking - this guy's apparent lack of fear (or at least great control over the emotion and the physical manifestations of it) is astounding. It almost exemplifies having "let go" (obviously not literally!) and not being attached to the self (in a certain manner anyway).
Could death-defying stunts be considered an expression of non-attachment?
1
Comments
Doing stuff like that is just crazy IMO. I think there's a healthy balance, being unattached enough to life so you're not afraid you're going to die every time you go outside but being attached just enough so that you don't kill yourself from doing stupid stuff. Just my two cents
(He's probably doing that for the adrenaline rush though)
But it seems that everything just boils down to intent, doesn't it?
Even with meditation, if you go into it only because you want to relax or because you want to gain supernatural powers or something, that's not a very pure intent. You're not going to make any meaningful progress.
Much like if someone walks tightropes over canyons just for the thrill and doesn't take anything away from it, they're missing out on an opportunity to learn something, IMHO.
Also, the bliss one may experience during meditation can be a side-effect that brings people back to the cushion. Not the best reason to meditate, but it may be the fuel that brings them further along the path. Maybe the same can be said about extreme sports: the adrenaline rush may be the initial reason why they do it, but it's possible that something deeper is taken away in the end.
@Jason_PDK: I know that non-attachment isn't not caring about life... but "not caring about life" is, to me, more like pessimism/nihilism. Life has no point, doesn't matter if I die, etc.
In this particular context, I think that "non-attachment" or "letting go" can be interpreted as a person being so not overcome by their "Self" that they do things many would not even dare to do.
But of course, it's hard to tell what another person is thinking. And of course, many of these people are adrenaline junkies... but I guess what I'm trying to say is that perhaps there's a lesson in "letting go" that can be learned from such activities.
far from being detached.
If you have a tendency to be virtuous, skhanda full or scandalous, you are attached.
If you are an alcoholic, drinking or abstaining, you are attached.
You are attached to youth or beauty or breathing or being. All Attachments.
That does not mean whilst hanging out, you let go.
Just be aware. To exist one is attached . . . comes with the territory . . .
:wave:
I suppose what I'm really trying to get at - extreme sports aside - is: do you think that some form of frightening experience could be an appropriate gateway to developing non-attachment, or learning to "let go?"
I'm not saying everyone should hang off of the tallest building they can find - fear is relative. But perhaps facing such fears head-on could be beneficial. After all, some Buddhist traditions have skeletons hanging around and suggest meditating around corpses and whatnot.
So yes one can find extreme fears to face, some of us have yet to face our friendly bits . . . our fear demons come later . . .
Now i understand the importance of my life and the preciousness of being a human.
can no longer laugh in the face of danger like Simba. ha ha ha ha!