Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Questions about Buddhism from the eyes of a skeptic
Comments
He wouldn't want to leave his lifestyle and palace to search for an end of sufferings of his current life? He had a happy life. He did not suffer. He just realized the vicious birth and dead cycles and wanted to end it. Birth and dead cycles are theory of rebirth.
In other religions, God's will is used to explain everything that happen to people. In Buddhism, it's Karma.
Karma and Rebirth are in the center of Buddhism. Buddhists from the West want to dismiss that and just peeled only a piece in the outer which is fine. But I think Buddhism is much richer than just the 4NT and N8FP. And IMHO, it's worth to dig deeper if one has time.
Karma isn't always used to explain *everything* that happens to you, depending on how it is viewed and taught. If it is taught solely as Karma is simply the result of action, then yes. But not everyone views it that way. Just like some people view rebirth as your continuing your energy when you compost into soil and something else grows as a result, whereas others believe in something different. Which is why I personally have a problem saying they are the core of Buddhism, because it totally depends on how you view it and how your teacher teaches it.
I know Buddhism is deep and since I am a lazy Buddhist, I haven't learnt much either. I just picked my favorite piece too but from a different corner. LOL.
While I have had the opportunity to experience evidence that parts of them are true somewhere, my meditation practice requires no such belief.
Allowing for their possibility is simply a practical structure to assist one on the path in much the same way that the precepts can.