Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

drugs

edited July 2010 in Buddhism Basics
weird thing to say.. but smoking and i aint talking cigs, and so forth.. calms the body..

i recently found realisation.. through this.. although im not addicted.. damaging ur body in such a way calms the body into more straight forward thought...

any comments?
«1

Comments

  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited November 2006
    If you look at the five precepts, you'll see that you are advised to refrain from such substances.
    Meditation will give you the same - or rather, better - results.
    Drugs are a toxin, and ultimately damaging.
    The argument rages, but no such controversy exists about meditation....
  • edited November 2006
    yea.. meditation doesn't.. i get very bad back cramp and im in discomfort a lot of the time. so its kinda impossible to do right.. plus in a way im always meditating.. breathing calm and walking slow..

    nyways.. smokin weed. does make me calmer and in tha respect bring me closer to 'enlightenment'.. i realised stuff that id never noticed before cus i was so calm..

    plus really unless i reach realisation not to do something.. why on earth would i not.. scripture are all very true and well.. but u gotta remember I'm me and on my own path.. theres nothing such as a 'buddhist' and although i will look and read stuff .. if it just says.. "mm'kay drugs r bad" then i doubt ive reached realisation on the subject..

    is kinda hard.. to reach realisation on many old scriptures due to the whole dating factor.

    also i dont think u can deny something til you've done it.. unless its like chopping ur arm off lol
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited November 2006
    Celebrin,

    If you have the time, please read this:

    Thanissaro Bhikkhu is the abbot of Metta Forest Monastery near San Diego, Calif., and has lived as an ordained monk in the Thai forest tradition of Buddhism for 24 years. The author of "Wings to Awakening" and "The Buddhist Monastic Code," among other books, he has translated many Buddhist texts from Pali (the language of the earliest Buddhist writings) and Thai, including, most recently, the "Dhammapada." He spoke with Beliefnet's Buddhism producer, Mary Talbot.

    Are drugs ever a valid part of the spiritual path as an awakening tool?b

    Some people see drug experiences as spiritual experiences in that they open up new pathways in the mind. But at the same time, others are being closed down. What gets closed down varies from person to person, but usually it's mindfulness that goes. People confuse mindfulness and alertness. In drug experiences you can be extremely alert--to colors, to certain relationships--but mindfulness, your ability to keep certain principles in mind, to keep a sense of judgment intact, is compromised. You're wowed by things that aren't actually all that substantial. There's nothing to guarantee that the realizations you get during drug use are valid. I remember in college writing down insights I had when I was on drugs and reading them the next day and wondering, "What was I thinking!"

    What is the Buddhist view of drug use?

    The Buddha saw that intoxicants of whatever variety limit brain function and give you strong states of delusion. People, he said, are intoxicated as it is--with youth and health and life--and drugs add more on top of that. When you're intoxicated, it's difficult to see reality for what it is. Not that you can't have moments of insight and intense experiences, but you don't realize how limited they are.

    Moreover, it's not a safe tool--it's a sloppy way of using the mind because the results are unpredictable and your power of judgment is so impaired. The Buddha wanted to give people a safe path. That's why he established the fifth precept: the vow to abstain from using intoxicants.

    People who've used psychedelic drugs point to experiences of bliss or ecstasy, and a sense of interconnectedness and compassion, which they see as spiritually significant. You can also have those experiences on a meditation cushion. Are feelings of bliss and connection important in and of themselves?

    Ecstasy is not the goal of the spiritual path. On the meditative path, we do create states where there's a lot of bliss. But it's the mindfulness and alertness that are also cultivated that help you understand the nature of that bliss--how you got there, and how there can be a sense of stress even in a state of bliss. It takes a lot of alertness and discernment to see that. In meditation, you use the state of bliss as a tool for gaining insight into the constructed nature of reality and as a basis for deconstructing it.

    But isn't someone who has attained nirvana, like the Buddha, in a state of bliss?

    It's said to be a different kind of bliss. It's the ecstasy of liberation, of having no attachments, no clinging.

    What about the sense of connection and compassion? Isn't that meaningful?

    Compassion, while it's important, doesn't end suffering. People who've felt very alienated may enjoy a sense of being interconnected [on drugs], but the compassion that grows out of it is not the ultimate aim of the spiritual path, either, unless you have the wisdom and equanimity to accompany it.

    How do the delusional states of mind that arise during a drug experience differ from run-of-the-mill delusional states of mind, like anger or infatuation?

    Actually, they're pretty similar. When you're angry, certain functions of your mind get shut down, and you do whatever occurs to you. There's a lot of delusion. You're actively blocking out certain aspects of reality to focus only on tiny parts of an experience.

    What do you think about the fact that so many Western Buddhists and Buddhist teachers came to their path after experiences with psychedelic drugs?

    I think it tells you a lot about the poverty of the religious scene back in the 1950s and 1960s--that people had to use drugs to get tuned in to different levels of reality. What bothers me is when people look back and don't see the limitations of drug experiences versus what they're experiencing. Otherwise, it's not really a problem, as long as the limitations are acknowledged and left behind.

    Have you taught meditation to students who are using drugs?

    I've taught people who had been heavy drug uses, and they just can't get it together. They have lots of problems with concentration, even if they're no longer using drugs. It can do long-term damage to the mind.

    I am not judging you, just concerned.

    Sincerely,

    Jason
  • not1not2not1not2 Veteran
    edited November 2006
    That's an excellent article, Jason. I've read it before, but I think it's always worth re-read.

    Anyway, having used the stuff in the past, I can attest that (at the time) it felt like a valuable tool for enhancing visualization & contemplation. I would go on walks & things would seem more luminous. Visualizing archetypes & such was also greatly enabled. At this period of my life/path, I found reading calculus books & the like to be engrossing and certain things made a lot of sense. It is also what made me realize the malleability of the mind. How a simple shift in its psycho-chemicals could change subjective experience on such a profound level. I started to see the primacy of consciousness & how the mind's sense of temporality was based on the state of consciousness. If one can shift their focus, they can shift their experience of time. This insight still helps me to cultivate patience.

    Now, at some point or another, the nature of my experiences with the substance started to take on a different nature. Or perhaps, through my mindfulness practice, I started to see the downside of its usage. I realized that I had very little control, if any, over the experience. It was very difficult to carry on a train of logic for more than about 6 or 7 steps, as I would always follow tangents. Additionally, as the effects wore off, I noticed that my mind was very muddled & unfocused. I seemed to be experiencing greater amounts of anxiety as well. So, I started to bring mindfulness into this experience. The effect was that I started to see this state for what it was, & that it I was getting very caught up in something that ultimately was unsatisfactory. Eventually, I lost my desire to indulge & haven't even had the urge for about 2 years. Still, that sensation of being mudddled & an increased level of anxiety still linger on. I've learned to manage pretty well, & it seems that the feeling is starting to thin out & break up, though I get the feeling that I've still got a couple of years left before I completely work out the effects of this intoxicating substance from my mindstream.

    Anyway, I hope this helps you in some way.

    Take care

    _/\_
    metta
  • XraymanXrayman Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Celebrin wrote:
    weird thing to say.. but smoking and i aint talking cigs, and so forth.. calms the body..

    i recently found realisation.. through this.. although im not addicted.. damaging ur body in such a way calms the body into more straight forward thought...

    any comments?

    Do drugs alter your ability to write and talk with clarity?:-/ :confused: or perhaps deny that a person has a drug problem at all?:zombie:
    cheers all!

    P.S. That little piece about the use of drugs versus enlightenment is a great article, Elohim!
  • edited November 2006
    Unlike many of my fellow Americans, I am not one of those anti-smoking fanatics. For instance, I strongly opposed the 'Smoke Free Ohio' campaign which recently passed. I say if you don't want to smell the smoke in a restaurant, don't eat there.

    I find the 'War on Drugs' to be a complete sham doing more harm than good. (If you notice, everything America declares a war on, that entity only seems to do better) If people want to smoke, let them. 'Thinning out the herd' like my pops always said.

    I don't smoke. I don't drink either. I have no intention of doing either at this time or another. I find it personally distateful and repulsive. But if others want to, I have no quarrell with them. Of course I might be a little more hesitant if it were someone close to me, but like the Buddha said, "Our lives would be simpler if didn't trouble so much in the affairs of others."

    I am in no position to hold the moral highground on issues like drugs. I won't tell you to stop doing drugs because I realize that only you can make that choice. I have no intention of telling you 'that's bad' or 'this is good'. You are correct in that you should know for yourself. My only advice would be that you carefully examine the choices you make and be mindful of their effects.
  • ajani_mgoajani_mgo Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Back cramps? Be confident about yourself - I find that it reduces back problems like a wonder drug itself. :)
  • edited November 2006
    Unlike many of my fellow Americans, I am not one of those anti-smoking fanatics. For instance, I strongly opposed the 'Smoke Free Ohio' campaign which recently passed. I say if you don't want to smell the smoke in a restaurant, don't eat there.

    I have to say that we completely differ on this subject! I don't care if people smoke - it's their choice. But when me and my family members or friends have to start breathing in that air, that's when I have an issue with it. Like a good friend of mine once said "Your right to smoke stops with my right to breathe clean air!" When I have to hold my breath when I walk into a building, and have to tell my daughter to do the same because of all the people smoking outside the front door, then I have an issue with it!
  • comicallyinsanecomicallyinsane Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Pain is part of enlightenment. The whole point is to train your mind to move to a different place.
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited November 2006
    If people want to smoke, let them. 'Thinning out the herd' like my pops always said.
    Wow. That's pretty brutal.
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Brigid wrote:
    Wow. That's pretty brutal.


    I was seriously taken to task yesterday for commenting to a friend that I thought the current wars are a way in which the Baby Boomers are culling the next generation which is snapping at their heels! Reminds me of 1914 but less 'efficient'. Smoking is a very slow way to reduce the surplus population.
  • edited November 2006
    lol there is a limit to how far you can cope with pain.. and an un trained person .. how do u expect them to cope with it..

    when ur spine is out of place, ur hips, ur shoulders and u can make ur neck crunch by moving it to the right.. lol tell me thats easy to shrug off.. when ur upper body is very sore and feels like u been hit by a car.. mmm

    I'll put it one way, sometimes standard pain feels like it alleviates the pain in my back.. such as being hit..

    I have gained more tolerance with it over time, for example .. there r ppl who wud complain at work about their back pain.. from standing up for 5 hours.. or even 2.. but i think i am in more pain then them and i don't say a thing.. you need to get used to something and gain power over it.. but there is always a beggining.

    i don't think its fair to say thining out the herd.. i spoke of weaknesses in another thread and i was seen as derogatory. But i wasn't trying to say something like that.

    The worst and most problematic ppl aren't always the smokers.. or druggies.. problems come in all sizes.. and all ppl... the expression "thining out the herd" really is nothing more than discrimination
  • comicallyinsanecomicallyinsane Veteran
    edited November 2006
    I have had a neck surgery. I have two bad discs in my back. I have two bad shoulders, two bad ankles, and sometimes a bad knee. The strongest drug I have turned to is Advil. I used to take painkillers but as soon as I got into good enough shape I slowly took myself off them. Now Advil helps keep the inflamation down and I live with the other pain. The pain reminds me that I still have a way to go. I am also training so I can cage fight at the end of this year.
  • edited November 2006
    lol cool.. i work out.. im trying to improve my shoulder strength atm.. my arms are all and gd now.. also doing presss ups but i still have long way to go to create enough muscle to improve it all..

    but after 30 mins of 'meditation' i can't generally simply negate the pain.. no matter what u say.. thats beyond my current mind
  • comicallyinsanecomicallyinsane Veteran
    edited November 2006
    I pity the fool that can't stand the pain. SUCKA!!!!!!!!!!
  • edited November 2006
    yeeess... xp comes with time, and time comes with age.. strength comes from practise and understanding.. and in other words xp..

    so being i would assume younger than u .. i believe u can fill in the blanks...
  • comicallyinsanecomicallyinsane Veteran
    edited November 2006
    It's not about strength of the body as the strength of the mind. For me I have to get pissed off at my body and my phtsical pain. For others it is different. I am a fighter by nature and I don't like that helpless feeling of letting my body control me even though it does have mopre than I like to admit.
  • edited November 2006
    If people want to smoke, let them. 'Thinning out the herd' like my pops always said.

    Wow. That's pretty brutal.

    Well, my dad is far less lenient about drugs than I am. His father was a long time smoker and alcoholic. He was a poor parent and husband to a struggling wife and children. He desipses drugs seeing how it tore his family apart at a young age.

    I don't think it's really as brutal as it is just observable. If you use harmful chemicals, you might end up with results not favorable. To me it seems like karma. I don't see drugs as immoral like many do, but rather unadvisable.
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2006
    The way to handle pain, Celebrin, is not to deny it or negate it. Rather you have to simply be with the pain, accept it, feel it.

    Palzang
  • edited November 2006
    As someone suffering from a lot of chronic pain, I'd say that I am definitely NOT against using drugs if it is for the right reasons. If I could find a drug that would relieve my pain (even occasionally) or help me sleep, I'd certainly take it. Meanwhile, I'm still looking. I am also coping in other ways. But if I had a choice, yeah, I would like treat or cure my problem. And from what I hear, marijuana does tend to help people with my condition - and with fewer side effects than the prescription crap I've tried.

    That said, taking drugs is not a light issue. And no matter why you are taking them, it is important to consider the side effects. I have certainly experienced enough negative effects to know that you have to be careful. At the very least, remember to make choices mindfully.
  • becomethesignalbecomethesignal Explorer
    edited November 2006
    Marijuana may not be addictive but it actually eats away part of one's brain. It's like very slowly pouring acid onto your brain. If you don't mind that, then I guess you're fine.
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2006
    I think you're right, Dharma Kitten. I don't advocate living with pain when it's severe and/or chronic. And I would never say that drugs are bad, period. When used correctly one can think of them as the activity of the Medicine Buddha bringing healing to you.

    Palzang
  • PadawanPadawan Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Celebrin wrote:
    lol cool.. i work out.. im trying to improve my shoulder strength atm.. my arms are all and gd now.. also doing presss ups but i still have long way to go to create enough muscle to improve it all..

    but after 30 mins of 'meditation' i can't generally simply negate the pain.. no matter what u say.. thats beyond my current mind

    Celebrin, I mean this with the greatest rsespect- if you continue to use drugs, even 'mild' ones like Cannabis, it'll always be beyond your mind. Here in the UK, we are currently undergoing a hard-hitting anti-drugs campaign, ramming the message home that drug use damages the mind, by showing a drug-user going into a store to buy a new brain. It's a gross advert, but it does get the message across. Prolonged use of Cannabis and it's derivatives have been proved to cause mood swings, emotional instability and paranoia, even schizophrenic behaviour in extreme cases. Are you really sure you want to risk your mind in this way?

    Three years ago, I dislocated my shoulder, and tore all the para-spinal ligaments down the left side of my back. I was in terrible, excruciating pain for many months, and damaged it to the point where working out to strengthen it is no longer an option- it will simply do more damage. Over this time, I have been to physiotherapists, had painkillers, and tried all manner of things, but only since I began to meditate and focus on my breathing and stance, and be properly aware of it, has the pain become something I can control. In time, I know it will go.

    Many years ago, when I used to smoke, I tried a Cannabis joint. Once was more than enough- the experience utterly terrified me. My mind was only awake, because the effects of the drug acted like a general anaesthetic on the rest of my body- my brain was fully awake, and trapped in a 'dead'body, and I was terrified that I would remain that way forever. The sense of serenity and calm you feel when smoking this substance is illusory; you only feel more aware and awake, because your body has been numbed to the point where it no longer distracts your conscious mind. This is why the Buddha advised against the use of intoxicants, as they have an illusory effect on the senses. We have learned, through reading and practising the Dhamma, of the illusory nature of the world around us and how it can decieve our senses; further deception by chemicals to achieve an illusory state of serenity can only be counter-productive.

    I am not judging you or condemning you for what you are doing, but I thought you may want to hear some words of advice from someone who has 'been there, done that'. Please, I urge you, reconsider...:)
  • edited November 2006
    palzang i know what the scriptures say, but i don't believe that can be obtained by a mere beginer.. realisation on such a subject i think reaches beyond simply mind..

    atm i carry on like normal, like it hardly exists but this is still not the realisation that may or may not come on this subject.

    I haven't done anything since i first posted.. but all the comments are much appreciated, they've helped me think and summarise things. Thnxs.. things can come to fruitition faster with more ppl.. i feel my mind has moved slightly further on no matter how miniscule
  • cjpcjp
    edited November 2006
    I don't regret having used Marijuana. What I do regret is having used it for as long as I did, and putting as much stock in the experience as I did.

    The only real realization I came to while using the drug was that something in my life needed to change. It may have helped a little in the way of pointing out the fact that perceived reality is so flimsy... but that's it. If you don't stop there, then you continue to wallow in intoxicated delusion, and your grades suffer, your job suffers, your health suffers, your social life suffers, your spiritual advancement suffers, and on and on and on.

    Take what you've learned from the experience for what it is: just more evidence that the mind is easily messed-with. Then quit. Trust me, after a while of not using it, you'll be surprised at just how sharp everything becomes again... shouldn't you really be here?
  • ajani_mgoajani_mgo Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Nice thinking, cjp. :rockon:

    It kinda reminds me of people who go into relationships and walk out and say "Heck, that was crap!" and others who are like "Dude, at least there's something I learnt." :) :rockon:
  • XraymanXrayman Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Marijuana may not be addictive but it actually eats away part of one's brain. It's like very slowly pouring acid onto your brain. If you don't mind that, then I guess you're fine.

    Ever seen a PET scan of a Marijuana user? the above is true in the case of phisiological brain activity. there are gaps and voids in the brain map. Really interesting.
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Before I was forced to switch to pharmaceutical meds (I was very opposed to them for many reasons) I used to take marijuana for the pain caused by the nerve damage in my back. (Marijuana works especially well with neurological conditions and studies are underway to find out why). It worked very well when my pain was still at a lower level, before my condition worsened. I switched though, because it was too expensive, too risky and most importantly the side effects made it impossible to meditate. It also didn't work as well when my pain level went up. I used to use a vaporizer which did away with the need to burn it for inhalation so I didn't have to worry about the physiological damage of inhaling a combustible substance. The vaporizer worked by heating the ground up dried marijuana until it created steam which is inhaled through a tube.

    I have seen scans of the brains of heavy marijuana smokers and they showed no differences from a normal brain but I don't know what kind of scans they were. But if you scanned the brain of a person using heavy pharmaceutical pain medication I'd be willing to bet there'd be areas receiving less blood flow than a normal brain, and blood flow is how brain activity is measured. I suppose if a CAT scan were used to scan the brain of a heavy marijuana user there'd be anomalies found, too.

    My point is, when it comes to the medical use of marijuana, there are cases where it is most helpful, especially in comparison to the effects of pharmaceutical medication. When it comes to recreational use, marijuana, in my opinion, is less dangerous than alcohol. But the bottom line for a Buddhist is that marijuana interferes immensely with meditation, mostly when it comes to concentration, and is therefore a substance a Buddhist would not want to use for pain medication unless it was absolutely necessary, i.e. the pain is more distracting than the marijuana and there is no other substance that can help. As a recreational activity I can't see why any Buddhist would use marijuana at all.

    There are many levels of pain and many different kinds of pain and they are all filtered through different perceptions and perspectives. The way I manage my pain as a Buddhist is to weigh the level of distraction of the pain and that of the pain reliever and take the lowest amount of medication possible. It took two years to find the right meds and to get the levels just right but my doctor and I did it and I walk this tight rope everyday. I allow a certain level of pain to come through in order not to be muddled by more meds but not enough pain to let it become distracting. Because pain IS distracting, lol! My doctor also knows that if I end up slowly dying in a hospital I don't want extra pain medication unless it becomes impossible to concentrate. He understands fully my need to be of sound, clear mind as much as is humanly possible, in everyday life as well as on my death bed.

    If my life were perfect I would never have the need for pain medication. But it isn't, and I do. But there are ways to manage it if you really work at it and the worst that can be said of my mediation situation as it stands today is that sometimes my meds make me a little drowsy when meditating. But I understand that's a problem for many other people as well, who are not on any medication at all. Like Pema Chodron, for instance. So if the worst thing I have to fight is a little drowsiness when I meditate, I'm a very happy person. I can always meditate right before my next dose and use the pain to keep me alert. I can't believe I'm saying this but I'm actually very grateful for the medications because without them I'd have no opportunity to meditate at all. Isn't life crazy?
  • buddhafootbuddhafoot Veteran
    edited November 2006
    I don't have a problem with people doing certain drugs. Now, if your current drug of choice is making impossible for you to retain a job AND YOUR TEETH - you need to think about a new hobby.

    But as for marijuana - I have no problem with people using it for recreational purposes or, even like peyote, using for something even a little more mystical. Not that I understand the whole "mystical" or "I'm expanding my horizons and perceptions" angle.

    Using any intoxicant under the guise of "I'm expanding my conscienceness" is not the truth. To me it's like a veil you are pulling over your eyes for a certain period of time - and then reflecting back on that period like it's "the truth".

    Living reality through intoxicants is no different than living a lie and believing it to be true. I also feel that some people wave the flag of "expanding conscienceness" because - when it comes down to it - they like getting high and now they want to justify it somehow.

    I mean, don't get me wrong, I've had some major mouth surgery done and I really, really dug the meds my doc gave me. I could take that stuff and feel like I was just floating through the air whilst talking to creatures that looked like giant doughnuts that had amazingly huge breasts and they would rub my ... whoops... I digress.

    Just my $0.02 worth. Take it or leave it.

    -bf
  • edited November 2006
    buddhafoot wrote:
    II could take that stuff and feel like I was just floating through the air whilst talking to creatures that looked like giant doughnuts that had amazingly huge breasts and they would rub my ... whoops... I digress.


    -bf


    I experienced that exact same thing when I was doing acid! ;)
  • buddhafootbuddhafoot Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Good morning, dearest Yoda.

    I have a hard time believing that you found someone that would give you acid - especially whilst you were wearing your tiara...

    -bf
  • edited November 2006
    Good morning, my dear buddhafoot! Nice to see you today. :)

    Sadly, too many people did give me things like that when I lived in Chicago! Trust me, I did my fair share of drugs as well.....Wish I hadn't, but I used it for a cover to the prblems I had had in my life as a child. But I am much smarter than that now! It is one of my biggest regrets in life, but I suppose that it did teach me quite a bit! And heck, who knows what kind of person I would be now if I hadn't gone through all of that. Maybe I owuld have found something else to hide my problems in!
  • XraymanXrayman Veteran
    edited November 2006
    "I have seen scans of the brains of heavy marijuana smokers and they showed no differences from a normal brain but I don't know what kind of scans they were. But if you scanned the brain of a person using heavy pharmaceutical pain medication I'd be willing to bet there'd be areas receiving less blood flow than a normal brain, and blood flow is how brain activity is measured. I suppose if a CAT scan were used to scan the brain of a heavy marijuana user there'd be anomalies found, too. "

    Dear Brigid,

    as you know I respect you, I would just like to clarify my stance on the post I made that prompted your response as above^.

    Perfectly understood. However,

    Brain function with respect to PET scans may be measured with by glucose creation, oxygen uptake, blood flow, "tagged" bio-molecules, perfusion and diffusion. All of them show a particular dimension of physiological process-Not just blood flow, this is where I failed to explain what I was referring to in my post about brain function.

    NOTE: CAT is the old term for CT (computed tomography) because Axial is not the only view available nowadays. A CT scan is primarily used for anatomical not physiological measurement, that I'm ranting on about at the moment.

    Note I used the words "heavy-user".

    PET and other NucMed applications measure physiological rather than anatomical "views" or dimensions of brain activity and function.

    Side effects of pharmaceutical-based medications are predictable losses and sometimes recoverable,. Uncontrolled "addictive" quantities of pot etc. ingested by chemically-dependent users would far outweigh the levels of brain damage (usually below the addictive threshold levels of medically-prescribed pharmaceuticals), caused by officially-sanctioned drugs.

    Having said that, of the top 10 pharmaceuticals used in the world The majority are plant-derived. Maybe one day marijuana will be similarly used and dosed according to need and predictive analysis will be performed.

    Like always, and to the chagrin of some people who use this venue to whine about apologetic-types, (apologetic types such as myself), I could be wrong. If I have upset anyone-Sorry.

    just my 2 cents worth.

    best wishes,

    Xrayman
  • edited November 2006
    i find it funny no one seem to care/notice/complain/comment/have issues with smoking until they were "conditioned" againest it..
    edgar casey says the body detoxifys 7 cigarettes a day.

    ms patients benefit muchly from smoking weed. among other diseases.. personally i have ulcerative colitis. i have been told nicotine is beneficial by my specialist.

    weed and tobacco have been around many years.. they have there place. they really do.

    ppl who are againest it dont no all.. they no only what they read or hear. i call it conditioning . all stats can be debated. check out who is writing them .. there is education there.
    please . there is a place.. and if its recreational.. so be it!!!
    big fat harry deal.. . geeesh!!
  • XraymanXrayman Veteran
    edited November 2006
    okay.

    Are you referring to Edgar Cayce? The medium?? I'm not sure what medical qualifications he had wrt the matter.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce I've read this, but I can't seem to find any reference to his "cigarette theory".

    Except I don't call being asthmatic being "conditioned against smoking"-just that it makes ME and my children gasp for clean air when affected by particulate cancer-causing smoke.

    You have your rights-true, but not to MY or my children's air intake-thats mine and their rights.

    I lived three years with a smoker-(not by choice)-and I have the emphysema to prove it (I never smoked a day in my life). so much for MY rights to clean air.

    cheers!

    Xrayman
  • edited November 2006
    i figured this would stir alot of rumble..

    i personally dont add to your dirty air.. well i guess i do.
    sorry.. iv worked in factorys and i still drive a car that emits polution.
    i havent yet did my part about large companies that cause chemicals we breath.
    i live in the country so that i can control myself. i live among trees and lots of them.

    sorry for your asthma... alot more ppl seem to have it these days..
    i wonder why
  • edited November 2006
    are we wanting to be "right" or are we wanting to be "kind"


    i dont want to cause any hard feelings..altho i admit i wanted to be heard.. my ego did anyway.. and i thank this thread for me learning once again.. my ego got the best of me.

    perhaps the war / the fight / againest smoking weed and cigarettes doesnt have to be a right and wrong thing..

    if ppl choose so.. then the ones that dont like it have choice to be not with them. and the ones that do so i really really feel they are conciencious of others. we dont want to fight.

    and my opinion still stays the same.. its a global issue of polution we need to be concerned with.
    and from here my ego is tucked away with no more debates/ and wanting to prove my point.. no more replying to these threads because it brings out the worst in me. i dont want to judge or feel anger.. or feel the need to prove what i believe. thats why i said earlier i have reasons for leaving.. i hope you breath better for not being with your smoker friend anymore.. good choice for you im sure.

    you are right my friend
    best xray..
  • XraymanXrayman Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Reference the above:
    Not out to prove a point Colleen. I accept what you say, as well as you accept mine. I love the real meaning of argument. In this case, no one's ego got in the way-we were discussing an issue.

    You brought up a good point about pollution though! We are experiencing a drought here in Oz-worst on record. we cannot wash our cars, water our gardens or our lawns-luckily we can still wash ourselves PHEW!
    there have been instances of large companies/councils allowing water mains to remian unfixed for days at a time while the water gushes down the drain-(domestically speaking) if we do that we'd go to jail. WTF!

    Smoking issue.
    I was in the military so while I was doing basic training and training for my trade-I was stuck in the same room as a chain smoker-that's what I was referring to. i understand that it was not you-and it was not intended to say you. so no worries.

    cheers
    x
  • edited November 2006
    thanks for your soft words..
    its me my dear .. my ego does get in the way. really it does.

    and wow what a mess you are in. thats all to bad... we continue to try
    but the problems of today seem so much bigger and beyond our control sometimes.

    peace bro
  • edited November 2006
    Marijuana may not be addictive but it actually eats away part of one's brain. It's like very slowly pouring acid onto your brain. If you don't mind that, then I guess you're fine.

    I read somewhere (maybe it's true, maybe it's not - and I should look it back up) that having chronic pain reduces brain mass by about 10% or so over time. As for marijuana eating the brain, I'm not sure of the validity of that, either. I do know that other drugs (like crystal meth, do, but it's the first time I've heard about marijuana doing that). But if both are true, maybe I'm screwed either way. In which case, I'd like to be screwed without so much pain.
  • edited November 2006
    Palzang wrote:
    I think you're right, Dharma Kitten. I don't advocate living with pain when it's severe and/or chronic. And I would never say that drugs are bad, period. When used correctly one can think of them as the activity of the Medicine Buddha bringing healing to you.

    Palzang

    Thank you. That is very compassionate of you.
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited November 2006
    I read somewhere (maybe it's true, maybe it's not - and I should look it back up) that having chronic pain reduces brain mass by about 10% or so over time.

    Hi, DharmaKitten.

    Yes, that's true. My doctor even gave me a copy of the article about the studies that found this to be true. That's why he suggested I take up meditation, because it can counter those effects of chronic pain. Luckily I was able to tell him I already practiced Buddhist meditation and he was thrilled because the studies that found that meditation actually had all those beneficial effects on the brain were done on longterm practitioners of Buddhist meditation; Buddhist monks specifically.
  • edited November 2006
    Celebrin wrote:
    damaging ur body in such a way calms the body into more straight forward thought...

    This is a tough cookie, but I will just say it: marijuana does not facilitate more straightforward thought.

    Aside from the issue of chronic pain relief (which I feel is too personal for me to make any recommendations), I want to gently but strongly recommend to you that there are no intoxicanting substances commendable as contemplative aids. If you are interested in Buddhist meditation, you should stop to consider the precept against taking intoxicants more seriously. In the Buddha's time, many priests were given to taking intoxicants as a part of their ritual experience. If the Buddha saw any benefit in this practice, he would not have named it as something to be avoided.

    I hope all that doesn't come down too strong. It is not my intention to judge you. If you so choose, I believe you would be well-rewarded to experiment with meditation after an effective period of "detox," after the drug has gone enough out of your system.

    in friendliness,
    V.
  • edited November 2006
    i havent done anythign for ages.. and i did reach a little more realistaion.. on weed.. cus i didn't exactly smoke myself silly.. i was just really calm and i contemplated stuff on a very calm level..

    you need to discuss in ur mind, whatever it is..and calm helps.. after about a month i found myself unable to get to the degree of meditative calm i orginally got..

    nyways... not done any drugs lately
  • buddhafootbuddhafoot Veteran
    edited November 2006
    Vacch...

    I thought that was put very well.

    Wish I could write that... cautiously and considerately.

    -bf
  • LincLinc Site owner Detroit Moderator
    edited November 2006
    Celebrin wrote:
    yea.. meditation doesn't.. i get very bad back cramp and im in discomfort a lot of the time. so its kinda impossible to do right..
    What's 'right'? Try leaning against something, prop up yourself with pillows, or find another position entirely. I sit differently to keep my legs from falling asleep sometimes - circulation gets cut off at my knees I find.
    Celebrin wrote:
    nyways.. smokin weed. does make me calmer and in tha respect bring me closer to 'enlightenment'.. i realised stuff that id never noticed before cus i was so calm..
    I understand what you mean. At the same time, I think that Elohim's post had a lot of merit when it noted the difference between mindfulness and alertness. It's really not possible to be mindful while high. Take this with a grain of salt (look at the source, heh), but I think that if you are able to delineate the difference between what you feel while high and meditative mindfulness, you'll have made a very significant step in your practice :)
    buddhafoot wrote:
    I don't have a problem with people doing certain drugs. Now, if your current drug of choice is making impossible for you to retain a job AND YOUR TEETH - you need to think about a new hobby.

    But as for marijuana - I have no problem with people using it for recreational purposes or, even like peyote, using for something even a little more mystical. ... Using any intoxicant under the guise of "I'm expanding my conscienceness" is not the truth. .... Living reality through intoxicants is no different than living a lie and believing it to be true.
    buddhafoot, I wholly agree with you.
  • edited November 2006
    yea.. i need to concentrate on it more.. but you know. I do need to prop my back up against a wall, or something but it doesn't help too much.. 30 mins is stilll pretty much the limit..

    still.. I can see some difference.. i still think that meditation and drugs create falsely induced emotions and mindsets. :P but only one is 'not self-damaging'
  • edited November 2006
    Celebrin wrote:

    still.. I can see some difference.. i still think that meditation and drugs create falsely induced emotions and mindsets. :P but only one is 'not self-damaging'

    How did you come to that conclusion, Celebrin? Do you think an emotion induced from talking to another person for instance would be rightly induced? How to arrive at a right mindest in your opinion?
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited November 2006
    fofoo wrote:
    How did you come to that conclusion, Celebrin? Do you think an emotion induced from talking to another person for instance would be rightly induced? How to arrive at a right mindest in your opinion?


    What I imagine you are pointing at, Fofoo, is discernment. Few aspects of the spiritual life - or, indeed, life in general - are more troublesome that to distinguish between the more and the less skillful. No single subject is more often at the heart of conversations that I have with fellow-pilgrims.

    One of the most original Christian Spiritual Directors was Ignatius of Loyola. Despite having moved some way from the classical interpretation of his theology, I still find his 'rules' for discernment to be powerful guides. Here is one of them:
    Third Rule:
    The bad Angel can console as well as the good one but for opposite reasons:
    the good Angel does it to profit the soul so that it can grow and go from good to better;
    the evil Angel does the opposite and, as a consequence, leads us further, into damnable intentions and wicked acts.
    It asks us to do more than examine our intention in our actions. We must turn our attention, too, to the direction of their outcome.
  • edited November 2006
    but intentions can go wrong.. even the best can create the worst outcomes. This was pointed out in another thread..

    i don't know about inducing emotions.. i have to think about that.. is meditation a falsly induced calm that leads u from reality and ur normal mindset.. or what? i have to think long and hard about.. it..
Sign In or Register to comment.