This thread is about trying to better understand the difference between rangtong and shentong. You are free to debate the matter, but the purpose is for all concerned to learn more.
My understanding of the difference is that rangtong is emptiness of a conditioned illusory self.
"So I say to you -
This is how to contemplate our conditioned existence in this fleeting world:""Like a tiny drop of dew, or a bubble floating in a stream;
Like a flash of lightning in a summer cloud,
Or a flickering lamp, an illusion, a phantom, or a dream.""So is all conditioned existence to be seen."
Thus spoke Buddha.
The s_hentong is the ungraspability or emptiness of the unconditional mind. It is the emptiness of changeless reality beyond birth and death._
Knowing that relative apprehensions are “self-empty,” rang-stong, and knowing that mind’s true nature is “empty of other,” gzhan-stong, a sincere practitioner no longer slips into garments that are extreme views about creation or cessation. Seeing that all phenomena that can be apprehended are empty of an own essence, one no longer clings to the extreme of permanence. Seeing that mind’s true nature is replete with many invaluable qualities that manifest spontaneously and naturally, one no longer clings to the extreme of nihilism or cessation. Since all relative phenomena that appear are empty of a self, it is conclusive that the mind that apprehends and conceives relative appearances is also empty of a self. Since mind’s true nature transcends what can be accomplished, affirmed, or refuted, then what one thinks must be accomplished and what one thinks must be abandoned are always and already pure and free
http://www.dharmadownload.org/pages/english/Natsok/0010_Teaching_English/Teaching_English_0010.htm
Comments
Be very careful of this part. It does not mean the unrealised have the purity and freedom to be douchbags. It means in part, the empty/realised, may form into expressions of non self, not being attached to the form, whatever the appearance.
This is why abusive and corrupt teachers, lacking integrity are so full of it. Ultimately they are empty, relatively they are not transcended, pure and freeing . . .
@lobster
Before practicing this way we have to first not want anger or suffering. It is a preliminary. If Khenpo Rinpoche were teaching in a prison setting he would start from that context. But we at NB for the most part are decent hooman beans.
http://www.dharmadownload.org/pages/english/Natsok/0010_Teaching_English/Teaching_English_0010.htm
They are both empty of a conditioned illusory self.