The five principles of realization and liberation
Jeffrey
Veteran
It kind of speaks for itself. But to relate it to my practice I feel it provides me with confidence to let thoughts be and also gives me the latter four steps to strive with in the future.
Sorry for the length, but it is really amazing!
The Five Principles of Realization and Liberation
The first principle is becoming aware of our thoughts and the nature of thought. By taking the position of just being an observer of the thoughts and images that come and go we discover all thoughts are the same: they are temporary appearances that come and go like clouds in the sky. Give no importance to one thought over another. If we pay no attention to any thought but remain in the "observer" role, it seems the space of awareness becomes more open and thoughts less demanding of attention. We discover all thoughts are without substance and importance. We could say our thoughts are "empty", like clouds: appearances without any core or entity.
The second principle is recognizing our stories and emotional dramas are structured only from thought, our "empty" thoughts. In continuing to observe our thoughts we should notice how they tend to link together in chains of meaning and particular significance. It is this linking together of thoughts that creates our stories, beliefs and emotional drama in a convincing and powerful way. As a result we may spend most of our time going from one mini-daydream to another. It is this trance-like state of mind that we need to break up again and again as often as possible. We do that by shifting our attention from thought to the presence of the five senses in immediate now-ness. Just notice your physical environment and the direct sensory experience free of analysis. Practice this shifting away from mental engagement in thought to noticing your physical environs as often as possible. Hopefully the trance-like habit of living in your thoughts constantly will be broken. In this way we can free ourselves from anxiety and emotional suffering as both are caused by the mind's stories that are rarely challenged. It is possible to discover that our stories and emotional dramas are as empty as last night's dreams. In fact our daydreams and stories are no more real than our dreams at night. We discover our stories are also just as empty as the clouds that group together in the sky in various formations that disperse and disappear in the next moment leaving no trace.
The third principle is recognizing that one's sense of self is also only an empty story made of thought; a mental construction without an actual identity as an entity that exists independently and with self-determinism. Studies have determined that our coherent sense of personal identity doesn't appear until about the ages between 18 and 24 months. That means previous to that time there was no personal "me" story or self-image. That also means the newly appearing sense of "me" is totally the result of thought-stories that the mind constructs about identity. There is no personal self present other than this make-believe "me" story. Even science makes clear there is just one unified field of energy as the universe without separate parts. The entire field is inter-dependent without any breaks or splits in the unity. The sense of being an independent entity like a "personal self", is just an illusion and has never existed in fact. By observing the "me" thoughts that arise from moment to moment we can notice the "personal me" is nothing more than a chain of linked thoughts about identity that are supported by memories and imagination. Seeing this directly and clearly, not just intellectually, the emptiness of personal identity becomes obvious to the mind at which point the illusion ceases. But that cessation will only occur according to the degree of the depth of this self inquiry. If it doesn't occur the understanding is too shallow and not convincing enough to the deeper levels of mind grounded in conditioning and habitual "selfing". In such a case one should revisit the first and second principles again and establish a deeper state of observation regarding the experience of the "me" thought arising and dissolving until it becomes clear that no personal self exists outside of the mind's belief otherwise. When recognition arises it becomes clear that the notion of there being a personal self is as empty as a single huge cloud that dominates the sky yet disappears in the next moment without a trace.
The fourth principle is recognizing what exactly is the nature of that which is observing and experiencing the empty nature of thoughts, stories and personal selfhood. What is doing the "recognizing"? What is this impersonal aware consciousness that perceives and knows? In these recognitions there seems to be an ever increasing evolution or revelation of wisdom. As a result one's cognitive space seems expansive, open and vividly transparent without a center. What exactly is this state of impersonal consciousness? It clearly has a sense of being aware; empty and knowing. Can we be aware of being aware? Is this aware consciousness present in all experience, inseparably so?
Let's look directly at this impersonal aware knowingness: In a well lighted room close your eyes. Notice at your eyelids that the light of the room shining on your eye lids creates an inner glow upon your closed translucent eyelids. You will see an orangey-red color at your eyes lids. What is it that is observing this color? It will seem as though your aware consciousness occupies a place a few inches behind the eyes and its attention is directed at the eyelids in front. Notice your aware presence as being the place from where you are looking forward from at the orangey color. Are you "aware" of the color? Now be aware of your awareness just as it is. Does this awareness have any color, shape, substance or dimension of its own? Or is it simply an empty presence of aware knowing? Review these last two questions again and again until it becomes clear that "you" are actually this empty, clear and aware knowing. When this is seen clearly instead of recognizing the emptiness of thoughts and self as the empty nature of the clouds that appear in the sky: the empty nature of the sky itself is recognized by itself.
The fifth principle is recognizing the inseparable relationship between one's empty, aware "seeing" and the five senses. One can't find awareness separate from one's sensory perceptions. We think we experience actual external perceptual objects and things, but we only experience internal perceptions in consciousness as sensory stimulations of sight, sound, taste, smell and touch; not their objective referents.
There isn't first a sensory perception and then an awareness of it. The five senses are this "knowing awareness" seeming to be split up into five separate sensory components. These sensory capacities are not limited to the physical five senses. "Knowing awareness" can perceive independently of the five physical senses with no limitations regarding time and space. Merging our attention fully with the five senses instead of with the mental phenomena of thoughts, stories and beliefs in personal identity, reveals a state of total "nowness" beyond thought and mind. A limitless vista of knowing transparency and Clear Light reveals itself to be our true nature beyond any descriptions or assumptions of mind. In merging our attention totally with the five senses, the luminous nature of appearances is revealed to be the vivid character of our own awareness.
The inner nature of the five senses is itself the clarity of pure awareness. We can know pure awareness through the immediate presence of the five senses. Pure awareness is never separate from the inner nature of the five senses. Can we separate awareness from the act of seeing what's seen? Can we separate awareness from the act of hearing a sound? Is there a distance between the act of perception and the awareness that perceives?
There are no concepts ever within the perceptual awareness of the five senses, and therefore no delusion.
There is never a "self" or "mine" within the perceptual awareness of the five senses.
There is no emotional suffering within the perceptual awareness of the five senses.
There are no "reified" or separate and labelled objects within the perceptual awareness of the five senses.
There is no grasping nor rejecting within the perceptual awareness of the five senses.
There is no hope or fear within the perceptual awareness of the five senses.
Skillful and compassionate actions arise spontaneously from the natural wisdom awareness of the five perceptual senses.
There is only profound peace within the perceptual awareness of the five senses.
There is nothing that the five senses must realize in order to be free. The perceptual awareness within the five senses has never been bound.
Our immediate non-conceptual experience of the five senses is pure awareness; a natural nirvana that never ceases to enlighten and never fails to delight.
~Jackson Peterson
Comments
Hmm. Ever wonder how life is without a story?
http://www.eomega.org/learning-paths/body-mind-spirit-meditation-spirituality/life-without-the-story-line
Yes you can, it happens in jhana for example.
seems like he probably means that the sensory perceptions can't occur without awareness, although yes, you are correct, the converse is possible (awareness without the five sensory spheres)
Thanks! @Jeffrey this is a very concise write-up. "breaking up" the thoughts with sensory-awareness/immersion is a great method!
Aldous Huxley once wrote it as "the percept consumes the concept"
Toward the end: (after the fifth principle but before the brief points)
"Can we separate awareness from the act of hearing a sound?"
"Is there a distance between perceiving and the awareness that perceives?"
May certainty arise! Joyful practicing to you all!