Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
'can' 'you' 'see' 'Dhamma' 'in these writing'?
if you see there is no point in this question, please let others to response
theruwan saranai
1
Comments
@upekka the eye makes contact with what appears on the screen (form to form), consciousness arises giving form to perception (neurons firing up-likes dislike -whatever), then sensation, (subtle tensing of the body), after which mental formation concludes WTF ?
In other words I'm not quite sure what it is 'you' wish to convey ....Perhaps others will have a better grip on the question....Good luck
BTW WTF stands for "What The Fish" For some strange reason a Singaporean friend whom I use to work with would always say "What the fish" instead of using the other more popular word that begins with "F"
May you be protected by the triple gem.
I can see the dharma expressed by the feeling of the words but I am not sure if I understood the question.
@upekka
On the wall in the lounge I have the following reminder :
"Whoever Sees Dependent Origination Sees The Dharma-
Whoever Sees The Dharma Sees Dependent Origination - !"
can ...........you...............see................Dhamma........................................................
All that rises passes away. Their stilling is peace.
Tee Hee.
The fault always remains with us.
http://www.uua.org/re/tapestry/children/loveguide/session12/168913.shtml
this is correct
but
how could we know when the eye contact the writing on the screen, there is 'form to form'
where is the first 'form' and where is the second 'form'
and
how can be so sure they are 'form'?
this is correct
but how can we know these writing rises and passes away?
yes, we read it and heard it and believe it
but are we sure about it?
to be sure we should know a way to see the form and know it is form
and
see that form rises and passes away
do we know and see it or do we believe it on the basis of what we have heard and what we have read?
Sure of the illusion ??? Form is Emptiness....Emptiness is Form @upekka
>
No, we believe it on the basis of what we experience and of what the Buddha taught.
What's your point?
Jeesh, honestly, all these cryptic questions.
The answers lie in the Kalama Sutta with a pinch of the simsapa sutta for suitable seasoning.
Take a section of the Dhammapada as the dessert course, and you're done.
One of the best bits of advice I received from a Bikkhuni was "Simplify! Don't overload your Mind with excessive thinking; There is really nothing to work out....!"
thanks shoshin, i went through the link you provided
but how can we see 'form is (equal) emptiness'
there should be a way to see 'form is emptiness and emptiness is form'
when we see these writing do we see form or do we see emptiness? or do we see both in these writings?
please let someone who knows these things explains
If I were blind would I see dharma in those writings? (don't ask how I got blind )
No need to believe anything. See for yourself that you are not a thought nor thinker.
Can.............
you..............
see................
these.............
words...............
arising...................
and.................
passing........................
and ..............
arising...............
and.................
passing................
and....................
finally.............................
ceasing............................
.......................................
......................................
@upekka
"Awareness is fundamentally non conceptual, before thinking splits experience into subject and object...It is empty and so can contain everything, including thought...It is boundless...And amazingly it is intrinsically knowing !"
Maybe in this lifetime or the next I'll be able to see the "dhama" in that writing or in anything, as for now, I only see food then I eat it lol.
The emptiness of form is the tendency toward change.
If one can see change they can see the emptiness of all things.
It isn't like emptiness is a negative quality, lol.
I did.
I quoted the Bikkhuni, who explained by telling me to basically cut through all the diatribe, and simplify.
You can tie yourself into knots if you want, but to be honest, I find it all rather pointless, personally.
I mean, where exactly does it get you?
Eating happens and enjoying happens, but to say that food was eaten would be a mistake!
reading no reader
hearing no hearer
smelling no smeller
tasting no taster
touching no toucher
knowing
no know-er.
http://awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com/2009/03/on-anatta-emptiness-and-spontaneous.html
'can' & 'you' is more than enough to question !
with love and splendidness, traveling
no where
but
@Shoshin , @pegembara ,@Jeffrey, @namarupa and @sova helped me a lot to go forward
i used there answers during my meditation and i happily announce you that i could go forward and 'i' can go forward without anyone's help here after
that is what 'i' have been doing from the 5:00 am up to now
if you (federica) let me ask few more questions 'i will happili do so'
if not
still 'i will happili do what i have been doing from5:00 am up to this point'
metta to you all
theruwan saranai
May 'you' all be protected by the Tripple Gem
'And also with you'.
"We" are life.
Listen, Shariputra, all dharmas are marked
with emptiness.
They are neither produced nor destroyed.
Close observation of experience is the method here, mindfulness in other words. Can you find anything in your experience which is permanent and independent?
**_what 'we' see do not stay (impermanent,emptiness)
what is there (eight elements) 'we' can not see (emptiness)_**
set of elements arises and disappears because the inherent characteristic of water-element is 'collecting and disintergrating'
it is happening all the time
again
another set of elements arises and disappears
consciousness arises and shows a magic (form, perception, feeling, volition) and disappears
'we' get deluded and think
'i see a thing'
'i hear a thing'
'i smell a thing'
'i taste a thing'
'i feel a thing'
'i remember a thing'
'i think i am thinking'
'i think i am talking'
'i think i am doing'
but only five aggregates(five skandha), name and form (nama-rupa), seeing, hearing, feeling smell, feeling taste, feeling touch, rmembering, thinking, talking and doing arises and falls away
again and again and again and again continuously
this process is permanent until 'we' see the process and stop thinking otherwise
just seeing this process is the first hurdle
to stop the process there is more to do
once one see the process one would know what to do
what we have to do is
Try to see the process
how can we try?
using 'our' sense bases
(you already know these things and i do not think i have to explain them)
Can you see dharma? It's all around you. Every moment of every day/night, it surrounds you, permeated you. You breath it, see it, feel it, hear it, touch it, taste it. Nothing is outside the dharma. Pai, leasure, thought, non-thought, it does not matter. To ask, 'Can you see dharma?' is akin to asking if a fish can see the water in which it swims.
Peace to all
Is the dharma self aware?
No, I haven't got my glasses.....
Which pair?
after one year of dhamma discussions, reading dhamma , listening to dhamma, peactising dhamma/meditation
do you think your own answer has been changed or is it still the same?
Yes.
Essentially the same despite changing.
In other words, the nature/arising/understanding changes in expression but not in refuge/essence/empty form.