Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Has There Been Anyone Like Buddha

edited August 2010 in Buddhism Basics
How would we ever know if the Dhamma that Buddha taught was even on the correct course or path. Doesn't this also present a paradox that how is anyone supposed to know if someone is enlightened? Anyone who has been claimed to reach Nirvana can show that they preach it, but it is impossible to know if someone can feel it. So the doctrine could literally make it impossible for anyone to know if the truth was really there, the "philosophy" could simply be continued be people who have claimed to reach Nirvana.

Sorry, this question might not make sense I just cant understand.

Comments

  • TandaTanda Explorer
    edited August 2010
    I share your questions.
    What is it you are looking for when you seek Nirvana? May be just that you are impressed with Bhuddha's teaching and invest your faith and trust in it and believe that what he is talking about may eventually make sense to you when you reach the end of the rainbow.

    As for me,I am looking for some down to earth things.

    1) SN Goenka's story of relief from migraine seems to be a credible stuff and it can be replicated in other areas of life.
    2) scientific experiments conducted on meditators seem to lend further validity to this.
    3) People who have done vipassana course give favourable feed back. All the internet research I did in the past two months brought only 3 cases adverse remarks but in my evaluation they do not earn much merit.
    4) The futility of material pursuits and their limited capacity to meet my needs is very obvious for me.

    I extrapolate all this to find a credibility for Bhuddha' teachings.
    but it is impossible to know if someone can feel it.
    I think I will be able to feel it when ALL my anxieties and ALL my disappointments and ALL my expectations are dropped-permanently- that 'ALL' includes nirvana itself.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited August 2010
    randomguy wrote: »
    How would we ever know if the Dhamma that Buddha taught was even on the correct course or path.

    The Kalama Sutta answers this question, I think conclusively. Simply, try to doubt what the Buddha taught.

    :)
    namaste
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Everyone is like Buddha. We can all experience the cessation of suffering like the Buddha now. In fact now is the only time. Practice is immediate, letting go is now. The difference between a fully Enlightened person and someone who isn't, is that the Enlightened person does not cling again, while you and I do. That is why practice is ongoing, we let go, then cling again, then let go, then cling again, then let..
    It is a matter of persistence.

    Slowly we wear out the habit of clinging. One teacher in the Thai forest Tradition called this "turning the tanker". We have this way of being that has a certain mass and momentum, and as we practice this habit slowy begins to turn, but that turning is firm. Yet, throughout practice, in each moment of letting go, in the moment of Dukkha ceasing, we know the cessation of suffering like the Buddha.
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited August 2010
    randomguy wrote: »
    How would we ever know if the Dhamma that Buddha taught was even on the correct course or path. Doesn't this also present a paradox that how is anyone supposed to know if someone is enlightened? Anyone who has been claimed to reach Nirvana can show that they preach it, but it is impossible to know if someone can feel it. So the doctrine could literally make it impossible for anyone to know if the truth was really there, the "philosophy" could simply be continued be people who have claimed to reach Nirvana.

    Sorry, this question might not make sense I just cant understand.


    Of course there is a paradox. Is that a problem?
  • DeformedDeformed Veteran
    edited August 2010
    randomguy wrote: »
    How would we ever know if the Dhamma that Buddha taught was even on the correct course or path. Doesn't this also present a paradox that how is anyone supposed to know if someone is enlightened? Anyone who has been claimed to reach Nirvana can show that they preach it, but it is impossible to know if someone can feel it. So the doctrine could literally make it impossible for anyone to know if the truth was really there, the "philosophy" could simply be continued be people who have claimed to reach Nirvana.

    Sorry, this question might not make sense I just cant understand.

    Enlightenment is not a destination.
  • edited August 2010


    Of course there is a paradox. Is that a problem?

    doubt arises from doubtful situations
    Enlightenment is not a destination.

    im simply using it as a metaphor to simplify my question
    Everyone is like Buddha. We can all experience the cessation of suffering like the Buddha now. In fact now is the only time. Practice is immediate, letting go is now. The difference between a fully Enlightened person and someone who isn't, is that the Enlightened person does not cling again, while you and I do. That is why practice is ongoing, we let go, then cling again, then let go, then cling again, then let..
    It is a matter of persistence.

    Slowly we wear out the habit of clinging. One teacher in the Thai forest Tradition called this "turning the tanker". We have this way of being that has a certain mass and momentum, and as we practice this habit slowy begins to turn, but that turning is firm. Yet, throughout practice, in each moment of letting go, in the moment of Dukkha ceasing, we know the cessation of suffering like the Buddha.

    i suppose that does that process makes sense, but from what I read a lot of the texts say that just simply following the path or process will not make you get rid of clinging. Is this simply just because he understands its a matter of willing not just trying? Or is it just because some are simply not capable in their lifetime?
  • edited August 2010
    randomguy wrote: »
    How would we ever know if the Dhamma that Buddha taught was even on the correct course or path.
    The dharma gives immediate results. If you stick to it for a while and you see no results, then you're supposed to discard it and move on.
  • ShutokuShutoku Veteran
    edited August 2010
    randomguy wrote: »
    im simply using it as a metaphor to simplify my question
    I think what Deformed was saying (and please do correct me if I'm wrong Deformed) is that enlightenment is here and now, not some future goal or destination. In the words of Thich Nhat Hanh, "there is no path to happiness, happiness is the path"
    randomguy wrote: »
    i suppose that does that process makes sense, but from what I read a lot of the texts say that just simply following the path or process will not make you get rid of clinging. Is this simply just because he understands its a matter of willing not just trying? Or is it just because some are simply not capable in their lifetime?
    If you want real answers to your questions, read fewer texts, and put the teaching into practice yourself.

    Now on a less philosophical level....I think the historical Buddha has been widely idealized. Even Pali suttas include some miracles that personally I doubt very much actually happened.
    For myself, I don't recall any records that moments after I was born, that I took seven steps, lotus flowers blossoming under my feet with each step, and proclaiming that "I alone am the World honoured one" in remarkably well developed language skills for a newborn!:lol:

    So can we become like some idealized imaginary person? Probably not.
    Can we apply his teachings? Yes, at least to the best of our ability.
    Will we become perfect and infallible? Nope.

    I'll close with a "Zen-ism" :
    "Thirty years ago, before I began the study of Zen, I said, 'Mountains are mountains, waters are waters.'
    After I got insight into the truth of Zen through the instructions of a good master, I said, 'Mountains are not mountains, waters are not waters.'
    But now, having attained the abode of final rest, (that is, Enlightenment) I say, 'Mountains are really mountains, waters are really waters."
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Shutoku wrote: »
    I'll close with a "Zen-ism" :
    "Thirty years ago, before I began the study of Zen, I said, 'Mountains are mountains, waters are waters.'
    After I got insight into the truth of Zen through the instructions of a good master, I said, 'Mountains are not mountains, waters are not waters.'
    But now, having attained the abode of final rest, (that is, Enlightenment) I say, 'Mountains are really mountains, waters are really waters."

    There are waters in the mountains, and there are mountains in the water. :)
  • edited August 2010
    Shutoku wrote: »
    I think what Deformed was saying (and please do correct me if I'm wrong Deformed) is that enlightenment is here and now, not some future goal or destination. In the words of Thich Nhat Hanh, "there is no path to happiness, happiness is the path"


    If you want real answers to your questions, read fewer texts, and put the teaching into practice yourself.

    Now on a less philosophical level....I think the historical Buddha has been widely idealized. Even Pali suttas include some miracles that personally I doubt very much actually happened.
    For myself, I don't recall any records that moments after I was born, that I took seven steps, lotus flowers blossoming under my feet with each step, and proclaiming that "I alone am the World honoured one" in remarkably well developed language skills for a newborn!:lol:

    So can we become like some idealized imaginary person? Probably not.
    Can we apply his teachings? Yes, at least to the best of our ability.
    Will we become perfect and infallible? Nope.

    I'll close with a "Zen-ism" :
    "Thirty years ago, before I began the study of Zen, I said, 'Mountains are mountains, waters are waters.'
    After I got insight into the truth of Zen through the instructions of a good master, I said, 'Mountains are not mountains, waters are not waters.'
    But now, having attained the abode of final rest, (that is, Enlightenment) I say, 'Mountains are really mountains, waters are really waters."

    Could you explain the last part? I'm not sure I understand it.
    The dharma gives immediate results. If you stick to it for a while and you see no results, then you're supposed to discard it and move on.

    Well yes I do see results, but you could say the same about a number of faiths.
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited August 2010
    randomguy wrote: »
    ................. I do see results, but you could say the same about a number of faiths.


    Precisely, Randomguy. This is why we need to learn from other faiths and oppose those who reduce liberation to a single path. It must be a real pain for theists that there are happy atheists or for atheists that there are happy theists.
  • edited August 2010
    randomguy wrote: »
    How would we ever know if the Dhamma that Buddha taught was even on the correct course or path. Doesn't this also present a paradox that how is anyone supposed to know if someone is enlightened? Anyone who has been claimed to reach Nirvana can show that they preach it, but it is impossible to know if someone can feel it. So the doctrine could literally make it impossible for anyone to know if the truth was really there, the "philosophy" could simply be continued be people who have claimed to reach Nirvana.

    Sorry, this question might not make sense I just cant understand.

    To me, my teacher isnt like the Buddha. He IS the Buddha.
Sign In or Register to comment.