Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Reincarnation for Dummies Like Me?

MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
edited December 2010 in Buddhism Basics
I was wondering about reincarnation. I mean, I've really been looking up a lot of stuff and reading my books lately, but I'm a bit torn now on this subject. I know some Buddhists believe in reincarnation in the literal sense of death and rebirth in a different body. Actually, as a younger child, I was some-what raised (long story) with the idea of it. Though, now I've been reading that most, at least Western, Buddhists do not believe in it with the actual literal sense. They believe something along the lines of rebirth meaning just an everchanging personality, that you are not the same person you were five minutes ago.

I'm not sure where your believes are held, so I was just curious. The idea of reincarnation, in the literal sense, was starting to make sense to me a little bit (I have loads on confangled, hard to wrap your head around theories on this and other stuff) and I was getting quite comforted by the thought of it. I understand the whole literal thoughts on samsara and such. Though, now, I'm wondering, if it isn't true, then what do Buddhists, that don't believe it, believe happens upon one's death? What happens to our conscious, our mind?

Thanks,
Jarred.

Comments

  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    It's consciousness that conditions life. Rebirth does not mean reincarnation or teach of any permanent self; anatta, or no-self, teaches that there is no abiding or separate self that is "you". There was life/consciousness before our "birth", and life/consciousness after our "death".

    All conditioned phenomena are subject to dissolution.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Cloud wrote: »
    It's consciousness that conditions life. Rebirth does not mean reincarnation or teach of any permanent self; anatta, or no-self, teaches that there is no abiding or separate self that is "you". There was life/consciousness before our "birth", and life/consciousness after our "death".

    All conditioned phenomena are subject to dissolution.

    Not quite the quote for dummies. :p But I supposed I should ponder this... thanks. :)

    And I noticed that there was another topic asking somewhat of the same question just a bit below me, though not named as so. I'd still appreciate it though if I got more answers here. I did read a good comment though saying "Rebirth does infact happen, but not with yourself, your ego, the self you think you are. Your self is not reborn."
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    That's exactly right. "You" are not the aggregates in fact, or any one of the aggregates (for there to be any separate-ness means duality still exists, but nothing is separate). Though it is said consciousness (that is part of the aggregates) conditions new life upon your "death", that consciousness is also not you nor does it belong to you. The next life is a rebirth, but of what? Not of you. :) It's a selfless process. The rebirth that is important to understand is the re-arising of unwholesome mental states that is conditioned by ignorance. This cycle of rebirths we call Samsara. It is this cycle that we can recognize and stop by applying skillful means; following the Noble Eightfold Path.

    I wish there was an easier way to put it. :)
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited December 2010
    For some of my thoughts about rebirth, see this and this.
  • JoshuaJoshua Veteran
    edited December 2010
    I think what you're describing about non-literal reincarnation that's popular in the west can be called dharma-lite, maybe you're interested?

    If you don't mind reading a bit here is an exert from the same website offering some of Dr. Alexander Berzin's own convicting experience with the matter, it is accounts like these that really get me to consider a literal, metaphysical reincarnation.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited December 2010
    MindGate wrote: »
    I was wondering about reincarnation. I mean, I've really been looking up a lot of stuff and reading my books lately, but I'm a bit torn now on this subject. I know some Buddhists believe in reincarnation in the literal sense of death and rebirth in a different body. Actually, as a younger child, I was some-what raised (long story) with the idea of it. Though, now I've been reading that most, at least Western, Buddhists do not believe in it with the actual literal sense. They believe something along the lines of rebirth meaning just an everchanging personality, that you are not the same person you were five minutes ago.

    I'm not sure where your believes are held, so I was just curious. The idea of reincarnation, in the literal sense, was starting to make sense to me a little bit (I have loads on confangled, hard to wrap your head around theories on this and other stuff) and I was getting quite comforted by the thought of it. I understand the whole literal thoughts on samsara and such. Though, now, I'm wondering, if it isn't true, then what do Buddhists, that don't believe it, believe happens upon one's death? What happens to our conscious, our mind?

    Thanks,
    Jarred.

    Hi Jarred

    I would like to point out there is another option here, that seems compatible with Dharma, and this is that the Buddha actually taiught that we must escape not samsara but the very idea of samsara. That is, perhaps the buddha taught that attachment to a the idea of an afterlife (which was the dominant view of the time) itself causes suffering.

    some food for thought there,

    namaste
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited December 2010
    I think thats correct thickpaper. I've also heard however that by such ideas we create seeds for co-shared worlds to appear.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Jeffrey wrote: »
    I think thats correct thickpaper. I've also heard however that by such ideas we create seeds for co-shared worlds to appear.

    I'm not sure what that means Jeffrey?:)
  • JoshuaJoshua Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Maybe Jeffrey is saying that our projections become reality in the afterlife?
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited December 2010
    "Co-shared worlds"...?
    I'm not sure I follow......:confused:
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    edited December 2010
    No disrespect to anyone, but I simply cannot find a good reason for believing or disbelieving in such things. Beliefs and disbeliefs can be encouraging or discouraging, but they cannot bring any credible peace because belief by definition means doubt.

    If there is something to be known about death, I am certain it will become apparent when we die. But we are not dead yet, so any speculation, while it may be exciting or depressing or whatever all else, simply has no credible experience to back it up.

    Buddhism, as I get it, is based on investigation and experience and not so much on fruitless speculation. In Zen, a teacher once observed (approximately), "I have always taken a great vow that I would rather burn in hell for all eternity than to portray Zen as a human emotion." As I read that, I take it to mean that feel-good and feel-bad are not the point of practice.

    Just noodling.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited December 2010
    valois wrote: »
    Maybe Jeffrey is saying that our projections become reality in the afterlife?

    Maybe, but that wasn't the possibility i was introducing into the thread:)
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited December 2010
    MindGate wrote: »
    I'm not sure where your believes are held, so I was just curious. The idea of reincarnation, in the literal sense, was starting to make sense to me a little bit (I have loads on confangled, hard to wrap your head around theories on this and other stuff) and I was getting quite comforted by the thought of it. I understand the whole literal thoughts on samsara and such. Though, now, I'm wondering, if it isn't true, then what do Buddhists, that don't believe it, believe happens upon one's death? What happens to our conscious, our mind?

    Strictly speaking, I'm an agnostic. But what that means is that I assign approximately equal probability to every plausible after-life scenario. Since there is no evidence on the matter whatsoever, there is an infinitude of plausible after-life scenarios — more than we can possibly imagine. ("The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, but stranger than we can imagine.") So I assign approximately zero probability to any given afterlife scenario.

    (Actually, I assign slightly lower probability to the Buddhist after-life story than I do to, say, the Christian one, because Buddhist reincarnation would have effects on this world which we just don't see.)
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited December 2010
    fivebells wrote: »
    Strictly speaking, I'm an agnostic.

    Are you sure about that?:p
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Agnostic on the question at hand, that is. :)
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Sorry if I've missed it in the posts above, but to the OP - "reincarnation" and "rebirth" are not the same thing. Reincarnation connotes a separate self that is literally re-born into another physical body. Rebirth simply refers to the energy that is life taking on new form after the old form is gone. I probably am not explaining it very well, but that's the gist of it as far as I'm concerned. "I" am not the same person "I" was in a previous life, since there is no separate "I" to begin with.

    Whether you believe it or not is not important. Whether anyone believes it or not is really not important. What's important is how we act right now, here, in this life. What good do we do, and how do we treat others while on our path? If there is rebirth, that's great. If there isn't, then we're not out anything by having been good people on our one and only trip through this part of town.

    Also - as a side note, our concepts of existence and possible rebirth are contingent upon our agreement that time is linear. I think that's a very narrow view, since there is a lot of scientific evidence coming to light that is to the contrary. Our human brains don't have any other way to reference time, so that's our default understanding. I'm here now, and I'll be gone in a certain amount of arbitrary units of time that stretch out into the "future". But if that view of things is all messed up, then the idea of existence and rebirth afterward kind of fly out the window.

    What fun!
  • ChrysalidChrysalid Veteran
    edited December 2010
    MindGate wrote: »
    Though, now, I'm wondering, if it isn't true, then what do Buddhists, that don't believe it, believe happens upon one's death? What happens to our conscious, our mind?
    The mind isn't a thing that you can hold in your hand, it's a set of processes. Stimuli (from our senses, our memories or from other parts of the thinking mind) engender reactions. Our brain takes a stimulus and transforms it into electrical data, nerve impulses, which get fed through the various different processing areas, some of which we are unaware of and some of which we are conscious of. The "thought" is the end product of this processing, not the processing itself, it becomes a stimulus which is fed back into the system to engender further action, be it further thought generation or physical movement.

    At death our guts stop processing food, and our blood stops transporting the chemical products up into our brain, so our brain runs out of fuel. There is no energy available to generate electrical charges for nerve impulses. Stimuli cannot be responded to, responses cannot be processed, thoughts cannot be generated. The cells are starved of oxygen and nutrients, they stop metabolising and disintegrate releasing any energy that would have become thoughts as heat.

    Nothing happens to our consciousness, our mind, as there is nothing in existence for anything to happen to.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Mountains wrote: »
    Sorry if I've missed it in the posts above, but to the OP - "reincarnation" and "rebirth" are not the same thing. Reincarnation connotes a separate self that is literally re-born into another physical body. Rebirth simply refers to the energy that is life taking on new form after the old form is gone.

    Hi

    I would like to suggest that they may be considered the same in the important sense of the way they pertain to an afterlife in many expression of both concepts.

    Sure it can be dressed up in various ways but a key aspect of both notions is that this life is not all there is, in some sense.

    I forget the Greek Philosopher who, at about the same time as the Budhha, said something like, "The universe ends when I die." This to me is the crux of the question: is this it or is there more? The buddha seems to have noted that we will never know for sure and shouln't get in a tizz about it?

    "I" am not the same person "I" was in a previous life, since there is no separate "I" to begin with.

    This does make sense, and seem's very Dharmic. But what often happens is that it gets misconstrued as being an explanation of rebirth, rather than an explanation of anataman. I don't know if I have made sense there:/

    Can there be rebirth if there is nothing to be reborn?

    Whether you believe it or not is not important. Whether anyone believes it or not is really not important. What's important is how we act right now, here, in this life.

    On this we agree totally.
    Also - as a side note, our concepts of existence and possible rebirth are contingent upon our agreement that time is linear. I think that's a very narrow view,

    Interdependent causation/dependent origination surely needs linear time to exist?
    since there is a lot of scientific evidence coming to light that is to the contrary.

    Actually, there isn't really, as I understand it. I could well be wrong!

    What fun!

    Isn't it! It just goes to show rebirth discussions can be fun!:p

    namaste
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited December 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »
    I forget the Greek Philosopher who, at about the same time as the Budhha, said something like, "The universe ends when I die." This to me is the crux of the question: is this it or is there more? The buddha seems to have noted that we will never know for sure and shouln't get in a tizz about it?

    Pretty much. :)
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Cloud wrote: »
    That's exactly right. "You" are not the aggregates in fact, or any one of the aggregates (for there to be any separate-ness means duality still exists, but nothing is separate). Though it is said consciousness (that is part of the aggregates) conditions new life upon your "death", that consciousness is also not you nor does it belong to you. The next life is a rebirth, but of what? Not of you. :) It's a selfless process. The rebirth that is important to understand is the re-arising of unwholesome mental states that is conditioned by ignorance. This cycle of rebirths we call Samsara. It is this cycle that we can recognize and stop by applying skillful means; following the Noble Eightfold Path.

    I wish there was an easier way to put it. :)

    Please forgive my ignorance and simple-mindedness, but thats quite hard to follow. It seems pretty abstract to me.
    Cloud wrote:
    Though it is said consciousness (that is part of the aggregates) conditions new life upon your "death", that consciousness is also not you nor does it belong to you. The next life is a rebirth, but of what? Not of you. :) It's a selfless process.

    Thats the part that stumped me. Anyway to elaborate on that more... explained out? I appreciate your effort in helping me understand, though. :) Thanks.

    --
    And the only reason I'm bothered by it is just the idea that any any time, any place, anywhere, I could be struck dead in an instance. Now true, in a pure scientific sense, 'I' have been dead billions of years before my birth and it hasn't seemed to have bothered me, but what is the point now then?
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    To put it another way, thinking about life-after-death is removing yourself from the present, what is here now. Buddhism teaches anatta, or no-self, that means you're not separate from everything else or permanent. Even if new life is born when you die, related to you, it isn't "you"... there's no "self" in any reality.

    Here now we suffer. We suffer because of our ignorance (of the Four Noble Truths) at the deepest level of our mind. We will continue to suffer, to endure these painful rebirths of unwholesome states, until we through our own actions (karma) break free of the cycle.

    Study the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path as much as you can. Sites like http://www.buddhanet.net have study guides I believe, so you can start off with basic info and then go deeper and deeper as you wish.

    In the two ways of thinking about rebirth, one is unknowable in this life. That's the post-mortem rebirth. You can believe whatever you want about it and it will still be unknowable. :) The other is the only one that leads to freedom, in showing the relationship between what we do and what happens or is likely to happen because of that (skillful and unskillful actions, leading to immediate results or planting the seeds for future results).
  • andyrobynandyrobyn Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Mountains wrote: »

    Originally Posted by thickpaper viewpost.gif
    I forget the Greek Philosopher who, at about the same time as the Budhha, said something like, "The universe ends when I die." This to me is the crux of the question: is this it or is there more? The buddha seems to have noted that we will never know for sure and shouln't get in a tizz about it?


    Pretty much. :)

    Reading discussions like this highlights for me how the propensity to think about such things, ie. beliefs has changed - I have still have beliefs, of course :)
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited December 2010
    My main belief is that I need to question everything. Sometimes to the irritation of those around me :)
  • andyrobynandyrobyn Veteran
    edited December 2010
    I have been doing some reading from " The Gospel of Buddha " again recently and this came to mind when reading the OP again tonight ... compiled from ancient records by Paul Carus, 1894 and available to read online here ... http://www.mountainman.com.au/buddha/carus_53.htm

    Said the Blessed One:
    "O Brahman, thou art religious and earnest.
    Thou art seriously concerned about thy soul.
    Yet is thy work in vain because thou art lacking
    in the one thing that is needful. [8]
    "There is rebirth of character,
    but no transmigration of a self.
    Thy thought-forms reappear,
    but there is no egoentity transferred.
    The stanza uttered by a teacher
    is reborn in the scholar who repeats the words. [9]
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    That's one great way to put it, "The stanza uttered by the teacher is reborn in the scholar who repeats the words." That is selfless rebirth. That is why the Buddha is still very much alive today, even if he's not. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.