Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Buddhism in Regards to MAGIC. :O

MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
edited December 2010 in General Banter
So, just wondering, what are your thoughts on magic? Such as... well, spells, element bending, potions, etc, or anything along those lines? Just curious. :P
«13

Comments

  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    No. :)
  • ShiftPlusOneShiftPlusOne Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Ditto
  • edited December 2010
    Are you offering?
  • edited December 2010
    MindGate wrote: »
    So, just wondering, what are your thoughts on magic? Such as... well, spells, element bending, potions, etc, or anything along those lines? Just curious. :P


    Practising Buddhists aren't like Harry Potter and his pals !



    .
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Expeliarmos!

    Meditatimos!
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited December 2010
    Oh lordy, not another one......:rolleyes:

    Pass the broomstick, I'm going out for some teabags.....

    (Moved to 'General Banter' This has absolutely nothing to do with Buddhism, Modern or otherwise.....!)
  • nanadhajananadhaja Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Dazzle wrote: »
    Practising Buddhists aren't like Harry Potter and his pals !



    .
    Now you tell me.Thought some thing was wrong at my temple:lol:
  • edited December 2010
    Read the Visuddhimagga to see what the mind is capable of and how to develop it so that it has those capabilities.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    People dont really understand what the mind is capable of. For a NEW Buddhist such disscussion are more attachment to drift off upon rather then something that leads to release from Samsara.
  • edited December 2010
    And the Visuddhimagga warns about the dangers of becoming attached to the mind-powers. But it is not "afraid" to tell you how to develop them. That's also why I like the Buddhist monks that aren't afraid to tell you about the jhanas and how to develop them. They put it all out in the open - no "secret" teachings. That is Buddhism, open and inviting of investigation.
  • Magic? Not happening.
  • edited December 2010
    That's a good point. The powers of the mind are never translated as "supernatural". They are translated as: "supernormal". I always liked that translation...
  • Depends on what comes under the heading of "magic". What about hands-on healing and energy-work? That's not magic, though some might think so. It has to do with electro-magnetic fields and the chakra system. And what do you mean by "potions"? Herbal medicine might be classified by some as "potions". Could you clarify your question and your definition of "magic"?
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    "Practising Buddhists aren't like Harry Potter and his pals!"

    Well, there you may or may not be wrong, friend. Everybody is different and has different views on things. Now I am just a mere Agnostic-Atheist, hold really no beliefs. Now, some Buddhists may feel as though energy could be transfered via different means, resulting in what one may refer to as magic. Neo-pagans hold belief in this and aren't "like Harry Potter and his pals!" which would seem to me like quite a bigotted remark if you would think of them that way. They meditate as well, but don't exactly have the same beliefs. It was just a simple question on what each of you thought about what people nowadays consider to be magic. Sort of an opening to a debate such as, "No, I don't believe in that because of... so and so..." or "I believe it is possible in some forms because of... so and so..." There was no need for assumptions, or even saying it had nothing to do with Buddhism. I believe it DID have something to do with Buddhism, considering I was asking BUDDHISTS on how their thoughts in regard to this. Do they believe that certain gems have healing properties? Do they believe that with enough concentration energy could be transfered into different forms that, as I said before, could be considered as magic? Thoughts on herbal potions and such? No need to start assuming things and giving very curt answers as well. Do I believe in that stuff? Not as of now, but my mindset is that I really can't be sure of anything. It was just a friendly, very-open discussion I was trying to encourage, but oh well. Off I go I suppose.
  • Magic is just as real as your computer, or your bed. And also just as unreal.
  • Buddhahood is omnipresence and having achieved with enough concentration energy. It can transferred into different forms.
  • Buddhahood is not omnipresence.
  • @MindGate, don't take it so personally. The responses are a continuation of the discussion you started. You've got your answer, most Buddhists don't concern themselves with magic. Buddha didn't teach magic or speak of its validity, AFAIK. For that reason, it has nothing to do with Buddhism. If you know of a sutra which has anything to do with magic, then please share.
  • edited December 2010
    Do they believe that with enough concentration energy could be transfered into different forms that, as I said before, could be considered as magic?
    There is a bit of talk on this from the Buddha, about stuff like going through walls, flying in the air, traversing to the realms of high Gods. All achieved through the power of super concentration. He goes on to state that the best of all of these (magical practices) is to be able to completely stop the mental fermentations for good.

    Thoughts on herbal potions and such?
    When I told a (great) venerable nun that I had the opportunity to take part in a "herbal healing" ceremony of the Native American order, she was pretty flat out about saying that "while such things can work, they are (generally) avoided by Buddhists as they get more seriously into their practice" - not an exact quote, but along those lines.

    The closest thing to "magic" (from my tiny understanding), is from the certain combinations of sounds that some musicians have created. When (certain parts of) this music is played over and over, I personally think it can be used for magical purposes.
  • It's a good idea to include sutra references when quoting Buddha or saying what he taught. I am not saying you're wrong, just that it would be more helpful to the discussion.

    Personally, unless I know something has been scientifically verified, I don't put much faith in it. 'Magic' is just inconsistent with what we know so far.

    By the way, I wouldn't file herbalism under 'magic'.
    Do they believe that with enough concentration energy could be transfered into different forms that, as I said before, could be considered as magic?
    Sure, you can take light, focus it and transform it into heat. Many Buddhists seem to think that the mind is some kind of energy or a ripple in an energy field. I am not one of them, I think that's nonsense pseudo-science. I feel that I am in the minority on this one though.

    Anyway, if the belief of magic or practice of magic helps you alleviate suffering, that's great. However, Buddhism offers a more direct and practical approach.
  • Hello, Mindgate? It would really help if you could clarify what comes under the heading of "magic" for you. Energy transferring, which you mentioned, is real, ask any acupuncturist.

    What about the Tibetan State Oracle? Is clairvoyance, "magic"? Or just a form of giftedness, like perfect musical pitch?

    Music stimulates the right side of the brain, which is the seat of "paranormal" abilities, feelings of oneness and bliss, creativity and intuition. Some things that seem like "magic" have a scientific basis.
  • P.S. There's a really good film that analyses the Tibetan herbal medicines, and explains how the precious and semi-precious stones in some of the compounds act on the body to bring about healing. The medicines were analyzed in German labs and in Israel's cancer institutes. The film is called "The Knowledge of Healing".
  • I don't think of clairvoyance as magic. Magic is when you turn a scarf into a white dove.(Except those tricks are never real.) Or when someone reaches enlightenment instantly, upon glimpsing the famous black hat of the Karmapa. Or when someone stabs a voodoo doll, and someone else 100 miles away collapses. Maybe these things will eventually be proven to have a scientific basis. Maybe science just hasn't caught up, yet.
  • Some are. Tibetan Buddhism is an amalgam of Buddhism and Inner Asian shamanism, so spells and oracles got blended in.
  • C'mon now, that's just hatin'. There aren't spells in Vajrayana; even the more esoteric stuff like tummo is natural, even if it's not known to the novices.
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited December 2010
    "Hating"? Is there something inherently wrong with spells? Isn't that a value judgment? Some women returning from study with lamas in India report having spells put on them. I'd imagine that spell-casting may've found its way into mainstream Vajraya from Bon. (Are you going to take away my popcorn ration for the week?)
  • Life itself has a kind of magical quality. The way things are interrelated and interdependent. No hocus-pocus, abra-kadabra, or any extra illusion for real though.
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    @Dakini: I stick with my original answer to the OP, which is "No :)". We can only look to ourselves, in the end; don't get me wrong.
  • OK, Cloud, what about the Oracle? Is trancework and clairvoyance "natural"? Just wondering. I say it is. Let's take a poll.
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Well anything that is, is. Meaning nothing unnatural exists. If there's anything outside of texts to show you that magic exists, then it does; but it wouldn't be magic, it would be something natural we don't understand. It would be Dharma. And yet, even with 2500 years of enlightenment, the world doesn't know magic. At least not the kind the OP is talking about... not even close to anything like what the OP was talking about.
  • I'm not sure what you mean, "the world doesn't know magic". But I agree, most things that people would classify as "magic" are real phenomena that science hasn't caught up with yet. And in some cases, science has caught up, but it's not something that gets taught in High School or even University science classes, except in the odd course on "Physics for Poets" and that kind of thing.
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    Yep. Nothing unnatural exists. That's all we have to remember. Nothing unnatural can exist. Ignorance can lead us in all sorts of directions, and take us away from the here-and-now where it's all so simple. It's just clinging; fear for power, aversion toward power, but ultimately clinging that arises due to ignorance.

    We should worry about our one problem, the one the Buddha gave us some decent advice on solving, but we tend to look in every other direction. :)
  • "Nothing unnatural can exist." So everything that exists is natural. Whether we understand it or not. Very logical. As you say, "so simple". So...shamans casting spells is natural, we just don't understand the mechanism for it yet. Or one can choose not to believe that the effects of the spells, voodoo, etc, are real, and deny the existence of the phenomenon. Distance healing is natural. Lamas turning into the rainbow body at the moment of death is natural. The "supernatural" is natural. I'm not disagreeing, I'm thinking out loud. :)

    Paramahansa Yogananda's body didn't decay for weeks after death. The coroners produced an affidavit confirming it, and said they had no explanation. I found that online somewhere.
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    I said nothing unnatural exists, not that everything that is thought to exist exists. :) Then merely those thoughts or views exist, and they're perfectly natural.
  • *harrumph* OK, be that way.

    There was an article in Scientific American a couple of years ago explaining the principle behind distance healing, BTW. Turns out they've known about it since the 1930's. I'll see if I can find the article.
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited December 2010
    :)
  • Healing, obviously, is related to the cessation of suffering, on a mundane level. But yes, to keep it on topic with Buddhism...

    I'm not speaking from belief on these points, BTW, I'm speaking from experience. I do like to investigate, experience and research these things.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    Definition of MAGIC

    1a : the use of means (as charms or spells) believed to have supernatural power over natural forces.
    So, technically speaking, I suppose, since there is nothing supernatural or unnatural that exists, magic could not be real. Though, what I meant, by my definition of magic was:
    Definition of MAGIC

    1a : the use of means (as charms or spells, potions, rituals, or incantations) believed to control natural forces in such a manner that science can not currently prove.
    Or something like that.
  • Science can't even currently prove enlightenment. :)
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    Science can't prove a lot of things.

  • Good to hear from you, Mindgate! The 2nd definition is very interesting; key words "in such a manner that science can not currently prove". That's a significant difference (or clarification) from the 1st definition. So by the 2nd definition, clairvoyance (oracular abilities), hands-on healing, possibly even acupuncture, could be classified as "magic"! Wow! For me, all that stuff is pretty mundane. but....apparently, that's just me.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited December 2010
    @Dakini

    I would personally consider clairvoyance and hands-on healing to be "magic" for lack of a better definition. I sort of mean magic in a vague way. Telekinesis, telepathy, speaking with the dead, etc, I would think to be "magic-related" in some way.

    By spells I'm not completely referring to things like "Shades of darkness, grant me vision in thy realm of Shadow!" kind of thing (taken from http://www.spellsofmagic.com).

    Even prayers could be considered spells to some extent because they are believed control natural forces in such a manner that science can not currently prove.
  • I've never heard of telekineses being for real. People fake it, like they fake spoon-bending. But telepathy, clairvoyance, communicating with the dead, healing--it's for real. The problem is that there are so many fakes out there, along with people with weak gifts in this realm, that it gives all of it a bad name.

    Western science can't currently prove acupuncture, either, so that gets put into the "magic" pile, by your definition. Western science can document some of this stuff (acupuncture, healing hands changing the structure and magnetic resonance of water molecules, etc.), but it can't explain or prove it. Yet.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    No disrespect to you, but how does the whole communicating with the dead thing work? I mean, Buddhist-ly speaking, if we don't have personal souls, how can "I" exist after death? And if you are a believer in literal reincarnation, why did the soul not reincarnate? Just wondering. :)
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited December 2010
    The soul, spirit, or whatever doesn't necessarily reincarnate right away. It hangs out in the bardo for awhile, we don't know how long, and it probably varies by each case.

    I don't know what the Buddhist view is, but some "souls", "essences" (whatever) are attached to this life or to loved ones that are still alive, so they don't go away right away. And maybe it's possible to communicate with them while they're in the bardo.

    I don't know how it fits into Buddhist theory. All I know is I've had someone communicate with a number of loved ones of mine,(over a number of sessions) they described them perfectly, the "medium" (whatever) even stumbled through trying to repeat what they were saying (they speak foreign languages, only 1 knows a little broken English), and this "medium" knew nothing about my ethnic background, etc. so...SHAZAAM! I'm a believer. If that makes me some sort of Buddhist heretic, well...too bad for me. But at least I get to visit with my (deceased) loved ones from time to time. :):):)

    P.S. A friend of mine who was REALLY down on this sort of thing saw her mother after her mother had died. Her mother would come and hang out with her from time to time in spirit form. After months of this, she finally got up the nerve to ask her siblings if they'd experienced anything like this. They confessed that they, too, had seen their mother.

    (This discussion is finally getting interesting! Thanks to Cloud for helping keep it alive until the OP returned.)

    P.P.S. There's a good film called "The Tibetan Book of the Dead", produced in Japan, I think. It explains (with animation) what happens to the soul/spirit/whatever after death.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    Seeing is believing I suppose. :)

    Alas, nothing like that has happened to me, and I sort of doubt it will. Though, there is this one kid from school who I actually had a nice chat with today who claims to see the dead. He's a Taoist though.
  • He's a Taoist though.
    Wutang vs Shaolin!!!! lol
  • Well anything that is, is. Meaning nothing unnatural exists.
    You obviously haven't seen 'Sarah Palin's Alaska'.
  • Seeing is believing I suppose. :)

    Alas, nothing like that has happened to me, and I sort of doubt it will. Though, there is this one kid from school who I actually had a nice chat with today who claims to see the dead. He's a Taoist though.

    Get to know that kid; he might have a genuine gift for seeing the spirits of the deceased. I don't know what "he's a Taoist, though" means. Is he Chinese? He might have a hereditary gift. Either way, such gifts are very rare and precious. I wouldn't pass up the opportaunity to check it out to see if it's for real. You may be in for a pleasant surprise, and a mind-opening experience. "Seeing is believing", indeed!
  • edited December 2010
    To boil down some of these responses into an answer to the OP's question, it seems that Buddhists, at least Vajrayana Buddhists of the Himalayas and Mongolia, believe in magic. There may be disagreement on some of the details, but it's undeniable that they believe in oracles/clairvoyants, which the OP defines as magic. And look at the story of Milarepa; he is said to have controlled the weather and other phenomena via spells. And the trancewalker tradition that Lama Govinda reported on, and practiced himself if I recall correctly. Harry Potter has a few tricks to learn from certain Buddhists, it would seem. ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.