Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Why is there suffering in the first place?
Don't get me wrong Buddha is the man and his teachings have helped me greatly, but why does suffering happen in the first place?
0
Comments
If your question is any deeper than that, it would come under what Buddhists refer to as an "imponderable". In a deeper sense, suffering just is. People can alleviate their own suffering by recognizing the Four Noble Truths and The Eightfold Path, but, deeper than that, it just is. I recommend that you read a biography of the early life of the Buddha up to the time of his enlightenment, and supplement that with a study of the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path.
I understand your responses but for the vast majority of people you can't just go up to them and say: suffering arises from attachment, stop clinging. We have habitual responses, these responses have been ingrained in us and taught to us against our will: mainly in schools and social circles. So we are trained to suffer, and for most of us the only way to realize something's wrong is to come about a realization through the suffering. It definitely feels real while we're in it.
(BTW, nice job with the new look, Lincoln. Probably a better place to mention that, but since I saw your post it reminded me.)
The question really being asked here is really "why do we exist in this state whatsoever?", "why is there samsara?", and in the most basic sense "what is actually going on?". These are complicated philosophical questions, and the Buddha would probably tell you that you do not need the answer to them to experience liberation.
A direct answer to your question would be: Suffering exists in the first place because it is the necessary outcome of the experience of duality and consciousness. With subject/object distinctions and the rising of Samsara, suffering is the outcome. You suffer because you think of yourself as something, and that there are other things separate from you. With no separation, there is no suffering, because there is no one to suffer (anatman), and no objects to cause suffering (Nirvana).
Then there is the second Noble Truth of dukkha (suffering): suffering, pain, misery, dis-ease, etc. and, at a deeper level, it seems to suggest the overall "unsatisfactoriness" of life in samsara. It seems that the "cessation of dukkha" (third Noble Truth) refers to cessation of mental suffering rather than the "direct" cessation of physical pain and illness (such as cancer, for example). Life does become a lot easier to live with lesser mental suffering and torment - this, at least, I know for myself from personal experience. So, just practice...
My first post trying out Vanilla. Couldn't seem to find formatting menu. But change is inevitable, I'm learning to embrace it.
[EDIT - Sorry about the quote and comment coming out in two separate posts - I have now figured out my mistake ]
but i hate him bcos he is retarded, i wont suffer much.
but if my son is a top scholar, i will suffer terribly.
That is a very strange way to describe attachment!
Even children and babies have a 'concept' of self even if it isn't self-aware as such - the instinct to self-preserve exists, otherwise it wouldn't eat or respond to stimuli.
With regards to physical suffering, maybe the beginnings of our suffering are sown at this early age because of the self-preservation instinct?
The short answer is, all we know for certain is that however it happened, people have the capacity and inclination to develop selfish desires and thus suffer. The prescription for suffering doesn't depend on how we ended up with this disease, only that Buddha found a cure.
I suppose the ability to form selfish desires came with the evolution of a mind capable of being aware of a self. Evolution doesn't guarantee perfection or care about a mind's overall happiness, only survival.
It's a bit like the mindless mind. I see that as an out-moded survival instinct.