Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Different Beliefs of Buddhist Teachings

Alright, so I have taken refuge in the three jewels, I am constantly revisiting the four noble truths and eight fold path, along with basic meditation. Though as I delve deeper into Biddhism, I see beliefs that require faith - I have no problem continuing my studies while rejecting ideas such as rebirth, etc.

My question: what are the official positions of rebirth, karma(carrying through rebirth), and other faith-based claims in the different schools of Buddhism?
I know in the west just following 4NT and 8FT without extras is common, but I'm curious what an East Asian, conservative view point would be.

Comments

  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited December 2010
    My question: what are the official positions of rebirth, karma(carrying through rebirth), and other faith-based claims in the different schools of Buddhism?
    In the Theravada Suttas, it is reported the Buddha said rebirth belief sides with merit [it promotes morality] but it has effluents [mental pollution] & results in acquisitions [burdens, attachments]; that it is not noble right view, it is not transcendent and it is not a factor of the [noble] path. (Maha-cattarisaka Sutta)

    In the Theravada Suttas, it is reported the Buddha said those who do not believe in rebirth may adopt & practice these three unskillful activities: bad bodily conduct, bad verbal conduct, bad mental conduct. Although the Buddha did not generally recommend gambling, the Buddha said believing in rebirth is a "safe bet"; it is like making a good throw of a dice twice. (Apannaka Sutta)

    However, it can be argued it is gambling because each time the mind entertains the notion of rebirth, this is becoming (bhava).

    Kind regards

    :)



  • I have 2 view points on the issue of rebirth.

    1. One lifetime is already a plateful, why bother so much with the other lifetimes?

    2. Buddhism is a medieval religion, from a historical perspective, its doctrines were suited to the era then. It may be deemed unscientific today, just like many are now questioning the resurrection of a certain cult leader 2000 yrs ago. It's really no big deal.

    The concept of rebirth is very much entrenched in the Eastern culture, as evident in its movies/songs and other cultural manifestations.

  • In the Theravada Suttas, it is reported the Buddha said rebirth belief sides with merit [it promotes morality] but it has effluents [mental pollution] & results in acquisitions [burdens, attachments]; that it is not noble right view, it is not transcendent and it is not a factor of the [noble] path. (Maha-cattarisaka Sutta)

    In the Theravada Suttas, it is reported the Buddha said those who do not believe in rebirth may adopt & practice these three unskillful activities: bad bodily conduct, bad verbal conduct, bad mental conduct. Although the Buddha did not generally recommend gambling, the Buddha said believing in rebirth is a "safe bet"; it is like making a good throw of a dice twice. (Apannaka Sutta)
    That's interesting. It sounds quite similar to the argument Christians use for needing God to be moral. Just instead of saying if there is no divine judge what's stopping people acting as they please, this is saying if people don't believe they could get a detrimental rebirth what's to stop them acting as they please.

    In a sense it's correct, a lot of people will do what they want if they think they won't get punished, so in that way I suppose beliefs in rebirth/divine judgement would have some benefit controlling the less ethically motivated part of the population. I think if you choose to follow the religious life though, rather than just being born into it, you're already inclined to lead a moral life so the beliefs are probably unnecessary.
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    "I have no problem continuing my studies while rejecting ideas such as rebirth, etc."
    ______________________________________________________

    Good. Just continue your practice and keep an open mind. You don't really need to believe anything at all in order to cross your legs, erect your spine, sit still, shut up and focus the mind, do you?

    My teacher once observed that for the first four or five years of practice, belief and hope were necessary. "After that, they are not so necessary." In my experience, he was just speaking the plain old truth.
  • My question: what are the official positions of rebirth, karma(carrying through rebirth), and other faith-based claims in the different schools of Buddhism?[/quote]


    I am not sure that there can be any "official positions" that accord with Dharma:)


  • Thanks for the replies!

    Okay, so I'm pretty sure that Therevada highly recommends rebirth, etc.

    How about Mahayana, Thich Naht Hanh?
    Just curious if I'm in the minority or REALLY in the minority :)
  • .......
    Okay, so I'm pretty sure that Therevada highly recommends rebirth, etc.
    How about Mahayana, Thich Naht Hanh?
    Just curious if I'm in the minority or REALLY in the minority :)
    The belief in 'literal' rebirth or otherwise is more distinctly split between Asians and Westeners rather than Theravadins and Mahayanists. But I stand to correction here... :)
  • I think rebirth is encouraging. Because all the experienced people who have created good karma could be reborn here. I met a little boy in a plane that either makes me believe his parents brainwashed him or he was 'special' but possibly a reborn sage.

    He helped me when I look back. Long story.
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    Rebirth is what happens in every moment. Why should it be any different when someone drops dead? The only confusion that arises is when anyone gets fixated on the notion that something -- "me," for example -- is reborn.

    For my money, you don't have to be a Buddhist to observe that everything changes ... always. So, is the person who began writing this post the same or different from the person writing it now or reading it now? Like water rushing down a stream, isn't it just the same old water with new swirls and eddies?

    Believing in rebirth ... isn't that a little like using energy to believe the sky is blue when the sky is already blue?
  • Here's a short essay that you might find helpful on the topic (if you read this and like the opinion then you might enjoy a longer analysis).

    The idea advertised by orthodox Buddhism is that karma functions across multiple lifetimes, that seeds were planted in your mental continuum long in the past and now you have karmic potentials that will blossom at any moment. This explains why, for instance, many Tibetan lamas who led very constructive lives were thrown into Chinese concentration camps for no apparent reason; it was to exhaust old karmic debts. The same man who wrote this article also confesses that it's very common and expected for western Buddhists to not believe in literal rebirth, or as he dubs it--dharma-lite. This is perfectly fine, though keep in mind, it more or less eliminates Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism because they depend on developing bodhicitta to become a bodhisattva which necessitates rebirth.
Sign In or Register to comment.