Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
what school of Buddhism do you identify with and why did you choose it?
0
Comments
I'm in the Palyul lineage of the Nyingma school of Tibetan Buddhism (Vajrayana). I'm in that particular lineage because that's the lineage my teacher is associated with. It's also known as the purest lineage in Tibetan Buddhism.
Palzang
Oh, Palzang, I can't think of you as 'Pure'..... But then, I don't believe everything I think.....;):)
-bf
But seriously, lol, I try to learn from everything I come across. So there's a little of this, a little of that - whatever makes most sense at the time, and that's constantly changing as I grow spiritually/philosophically. If I had to pick a major branch, though, I'm lean towards Zen.
New school with a bit of that old school flavor.
Jason
The first book I ever read was " Zen Buddhism " & I think, know the writer was a zen monk called "Shunryu Suzuki".
" Shunryu suzuki san used to get up very early in the morning and run up & down a mountain." must of had a great view.:thumbsup:
Is there a path between all the traditions?
And it's the lineage that's Pure, Fed, not me!
Of course Nyingma means "the old ones", so you could call it That Old-time Religion, eh?
Palzang
I knew a woman in the UK who adhered to the school of "Shake your Money, Buster!"
Bless her, let's just say she followed the eightfold path of 'Wrong Everything'....!:o
Started out Mahayana, went on to Thervada and then turned around and became Pudgalavadin (Sammitiya).....
Esau.....
Adiana:mullet: :usflag:
FURTHER COMMENT:
I have read the Trilogy of the "Awakening" Books by Lama Surya Das, and also his subsequent publication, "Letting Go of the person you used to be."
I know his practises have caused controversy among some, and I have seen written criticism of him by other Buddhists, in the form of heresay - that is to say that 'thus they have heard' about him....! However, I find his books educational without being dull or patronising, and he makes the topic and subject of Buddhism particularly digestible for those new to Buddhism.
He's very likeable and extremely knowlegeable, but seems extremely open and laid back.... he can also be extremely funny - and it reminds me that "What we learn with Pleasure, we seldom forget."
I'm Mahayana, but until I join a temple, I don't think I'll be able to get any more specific than that :P