Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
84,000 Teachings - A single Goal
According to Traditional Buddhist Beliefs , The Historical Buddha, realizing that there are many different types of people gave 84,000 types of Dharma Teachings to insure that each one of us would be able to work toward the ultimate goal of ending the suffering in our lives. This in turn lead to the formation of the 3 Yanas.
There has been much debate over the years as to the relative merits of each of the Yanas and how they are connected.
But are they really supposed to connect?
On a very basic level each of the Yanas is a pathway to ultimate Enlightenment , however the basic starting point as well as some of the methods are very different.
I am part of the Kaygu Lineage of Tibetan Buddhism because the teachings that are at the Heart of the Kaygu line resonant very strongly with me. On a personal level , other forms of Buddhism are not as appealing and I do not feel the same connection to them. At the same time, I very much respect other types of Buddhism and other faiths as well an am very happy that there are other schools of thought that are able to help people.
I certainly do not want to turn this thread into a Blog for my own thoughts, and would love to get feedback on this one basic thought…
Is there a need to connect the Teachings of the Yanas / Schools of Buddhism to a larger framework? And are the perceived discrepancies between some of the sutras etc important to discuss in a Spiritual / Historical context? Or, if one is satisfied that the Path that they are on is authentic should any conflicts in the Teachings be ignored as unimportant?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts !
0
Comments
Just my two cents.
Speaking for itself; anicca, dukka, anatta