Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
How Do You Know If Your Reality Is Real?
How Do You Know If Your Reality Is Real?
0
Comments
If I call it unreal, I run into trouble.
I'm just a Buddhist wuss who likes to stay out of trouble.
Define "Reality."
The dictionary definition below is superficial.
"The world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them."
Is that what you are saying?
Or is it the whole "western mind," thinking that I have to find what is "real," or not "real," because I wont be satisfied with just being? Or how can one just be? Is there not anything more out there?
Could it be age? (25)...
I don't know... Just wondering?
Simply put, reality is what enables us to direct our life. You knew that when you opened your computer you could access a website to ask this question, that's reality. Reality works according to it's own rules, not our desires..
I love reality! It's so simple and complex at the same time.
When we dream is it also reality?
Or do we instead look internally and not externally?
Meditation?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_argument
You don't. It's something you can't prove or disprove, like God. So, there's no point spending energy on it.
I like these questions as I get to play, thanks Leon
Cheers, WK
Thanks!
And Welcome!
Or when you think you fall down in a dream and you have to wake up and go to the bathroom and throw up?
However, even though it is just an assumption, I do believe reality outside my own mind exists, and that it really is somewhat like how I believe it is (other humans are also conscious, nearly all mammals also are, matter has form, etc.). I don't know it's real, but I assume it is. That's never happened to me. Sounds pretty bad
Cultivate a practice of meditation, Leon, this is closer to the truth, your final answers will never be on this forum IMO.
I rather observe how others view their reality like...
If you were to lose all your sense, what reality would exist? Only your thoughts - and your mind is part of the body that creates senses in the first place.
There doesn't seem to be any ultimate reality outside of our perception. Our perception is reality. My reality is real because it is my reality. It may not be real to someone else, but its real to me.
Just my thoughts as of now.
as mentioned above - emptiness is form, form is emptiness.
While we're at it? We can only know things like humans know things.
Meditation? That's gotta be the only time humans "know" something beyond the human realm, problem is: that knowing can NOT be communicated to others.
Works for me.
Humans think there are static forms and worlds that exist independently of our gushy, wet, chemical brains connected to blood-washed sense organs.
Problem is: there's nothing "really" there except when "whatever-it-is" comes via those sense organs.
"Reality" is a process everybody works with. Sometimes our "processing" overlaps with other people's and THEN we tend to start believing something permanent and independent is in play. It's not!
Sure is fun though. :clap:
The common continuum we live in is anything but static though, as evidenced by the findings of astrophysicists and the indefinite expansion of the universe (which I think is akin to the zooming of a fractal), let alone the experiences of day to day existence. This expansion also undermines the supposed permanence of the physical laws, but there is a common thread there still. The fact that we share all the same laws at any given time is, in some way, proof that were all the same organism. The fact we receive inter-related signals of some kind into our gushy organs is proof we have a common thread. I think were ultimately some kind of reflection of one another and that might be a permanent condition of the universe. The universe is constantly acting like a mirror unto itself. The fact all these atoms function seamlessly with another makes me think that, in some way, its the same object folded over itself a tremendous amount of times.
I have to disagree though. I think much of the overlapping is proof of something permanent and rudimentary to a certain extent, but I do agree with you that the notion of a world external to us is just an illusion.