Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Middle-eastern and Egyptian Revolutions
Why the hell isn't the American press covering these amazing feats? It is inspirational, some of these places like Iran are terrible places to live under their sharian governments and fatwas. For the Iranian people to rise up is beyond belief and deserves an international applause.
Is the US afraid to give people inspiration? What happened to the free press? The world is changing, the world is in turmoil, and on American television all that matters is that some guy beat his wife in a trailer or whether the "economic crisis" is diminishing or not.
..
Israel and Iran are probably going to war. If Israel does then by extension the US is in official war. WWIII?
..
Iran bombs protesters.
..
The US has been trying to destroy Al Jazeera for a long time. We've bombed them at least twice that I know of after they politely gave us their coordinates when we asked. Wtf?
0
Comments
It is both exciting and scary. On the one hand, it's a spontaneous outburst of democracy. On the other, it does mean that a certain amount fo violence and chaos is about to happen, and that the region may become even less stable than it already was! Also, there are the fears that in some cases a dictator may be replaced by a fundamentalist Islamic regime (eg the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt).
Peace to all
As for Egypt, I think it's a bit too early to cheer. We should wait and see what comes of it. Might just be another Orange Revolution.
I think the media isn't covering it is because mainstream news is more about 'entertainment' than news. Over here in Australia we have a channel called SBS which actually covers world news. They often get things wrong, but at least they make an effort to cover these events.
I don't think Americans who would want revolution actually know what they want the outcome of that revolution to be. You have the Ron Paul crowd and the socialist crowd and both are extreme ends which aren't practical. The conditions in America are as good as they can be given the circumstances. I don't see anything good coming out of any sort of uprising (not to mention that the numbers just aren't there).
And I am done pretending to know what I am talking about...
Not much wrong with Ron Paul, it's the supporters which worry me. The attitude of labelling any sort of services which offer some sort of benefit as 'socialism' is just counter-productive. You pay so much in taxes, yet complain when some of it actually goes to help someone. It's fine when it goes to the military and invested in getting your sons and daughters slaughtered overseas, but when it covers medical expenses, it's socialism.
This guy says it best:
I have a thread bitching that I can't see a doctor for my knee.
I hate my country.
Isn't this amazing?
..
By the way, those .50 caliber bullets are intended for fighting jets and tanks, when fired at a human his body tends to separate in half.
..
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/02/20/libya-governments-should-demand-end-unlawful-killings
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/02/whats-happening-libya-explained
How many civilian casualties have there been if foreign journalists aren't allowed to cover the news?
..
My girlfriend tells me that the free press is so terrible that on Twitter there is an outcry for Arabic speakers to translate the massive outburst of Arabic tweets covering the revolution. At least for those whose internet and cell phones haven't been shut off like what happened to the Egyptians.
[source]
In my opinion they aren't covering this properly in the "press". Of course, perhaps our Libyans friends are playing a prank here? I know I feel like shit sitting here not having to worry while this man sits waiting for some African mercenaries who can't even understand his Arabic pleas to chop his children into bits with a machete.
Who knows...
Well you at least got American news is entertainment and it truly is.
I have basic digital TV, not even cable, and I get all the news I need from the American media. That, together with a basic internet signal, provides me with plenty of good and sympathetic coverage of this situation.
It infuriates me. It's common knowledge that the American press is not free, you must go online for your news.
Watch NBC Nightly News and/or MSNBC tonight. You'll see what I mean.
I must have missed that common knowledge of which you speak. NBC was pretty nasty to Egypt, i.e. supportive of the demonstrators, almost to the point that they would fall into Mubarak's accusations that foreign media was fomenting the uprising.
I'm a news junkie and I'm perfectly happy with what I see. You just need to know where to look.
SherabDorje... fox news is a joke. confirmation bias at its best.
The second video does the best job, it almost captures the truth implicitly in the middle for around thirty seconds. As if to say that although the casualties are between 3-400 that everyone around has bullet wounds. Gaddafi's son said the country would flow with rivers of blood, and now denies allegations of even several hundred deaths. Bullshit.
I was wrong. I do wish though that the news would be a much better job at capturing the violence without being afraid to draw obvious conclusions.
Civil war in an oil-producing country. Gasoline prices rising to $4-maybe even $5 by summer? I think we may be looking at mass petroleum-conservation measures a lot sooner than a lot of people have thought.
Any good stories?
Intervention is needed from U.N. now. Air support should be provided to opposition so that the Mad General cannot move around. Perhaps ship in some bullets for opposition so they can defend themselves. Let the General have Tripoli for now and he will eventually fall.
Here in USA, all outlets for news are available including Fox and Al-Jazeera (BOTH of which are doing a good job of reporting this situation). We can be informed if we choose.