Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Re: Question on pornography and sarcasm.

hermitwinhermitwin Veteran
edited February 2011 in Buddhism Basics
Dear federica, I think it could have been a little harsh to label zenken as sarcastic.
Surely, there are many worse offenders. I hope I am not out of line here.
Thousand apologies....

Comments

  • I also happen to think that sometimes sarcasm is an effective way to make a point. I hope I dont get a warning for this.
  • PM her
  • I was hoping other members would also comment.
  • IMO Fed knows what she's doing and IME weighs all factors and states her case appropriately. And I think this puts her in a bad spot based on the discussion yesterday regarding what moderators do and don't do and why and why not. I sincerely doubt that you'll get a warning for this, because Fed is eminently fair.

    We should not have a lengthy discussion about this.

    If you feel that strongly about it, invite zenken back. I don't think he was banned.
  • I also think this is a private matter. Private messaging is the way to go.
  • LincLinc Site owner Detroit Moderator
    May have been a bit much for his first day, but I must be missing where she called him 'sarcastic' or otherwise. In any case, let's not play "shout down the moderator" and just contact me or the moderator when you're concerned about their response to something.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    Quite.

    Thanks to all who contributed mindfully.
This discussion has been closed.