Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Respect for Tradition

hermitwinhermitwin Veteran
edited February 2011 in Buddhism Basics
I enjoy reading arguments put forth by various members. But I would like to remind all to give due respect to the traditional form of Buddhism.
When did westerners start learning and practising Buddhism?
Prior to that Buddhism has been preserved and transmitted in conservative Asian societies for over 2000 years. Without that conservative tradition, westerners would not even have the chance to learn Buddhism.
Members who dismiss or critique their way of doing things would do well reevaluate themselves.

Comments

  • One thing I've learned on this forum is that there is more than one traditional form of Buddhism; each school has its own take on certain questions, and this seems to be what generates the debate here. Could you explain, hermitwin, what you're referring to, when you say "the traditional form of Buddhism"?
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    Yes, and Christians should respect and follow traditional Christianity. Ya know, throwing rocks at people, burning witches and non-believers, covering themselves with birds blood to heal warts. That kind of thing. /sarcasm/

    Hermitwin, because times change, that also means religion, beliefs, and attitudes need to change too. Just saying.
  • Yes, and Christians should respect and follow traditional Christianity. Ya know, throwing rocks at people, burning witches and non-believers, covering themselves with birds blood to heal warts. That kind of thing. /sarcasm/

    Hermitwin, because times change, that also means religion, beliefs, and attitudes need to change too. Just saying.
    Bless you, MindGate!

    But maybe he has a point. We need to find out first, what it is he has in mind.
  • I think part of respecting a tradition is also questioning it.
    It's not healthy to confuse questioning with disrespect.
    I think in order for a religion/philosophy to remain healthy it must be constantly evolving and questioning itself. It must be an ongoing discourse.
  • Very wise, Newstatesman. And Buddhism has always adapted itself to different cultures, it's never been something static. But more respect in general on this forum would be a good thing.
  • @mindgate
    Times may change and everything is impermanent, but buddhism should be followed as the buddha himself taught it. It is written that he knew what he was doing would have an impact on the people of the future, and that he had started the dhamma stone 'rolling'. Everything that he taught can be adapted to today's life, the schools, traditions and whatever else that has come since has been fabricated by people, not the buddha. His word, the dhamma is what is important to me.
    However, I never go around trying to disrespect a tradition, I just see it for what it is
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited February 2011
    @ThailandTom

    Some older Buddhist traditions don't follow the Buddha's true teachings, instead they add their own cultural teachings into it. These are still traditional teachings, but not the Buddha's true teachings. True Buddhism is timeless.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited February 2011
    @ Mindgate:

    The Buddhas words were also dependently arisen from factors such as tradition. So the notion that the Buddha was pure whereas laterday were impure is bogus. Not to remove the distinction that Buddha was awake, a extraordinary state of mind.

    Time is illusory. Once you do not attach to that construct everyone's words are timeless. But I know what you are saying. Mindfulness is relevant in modern culture. But note how Mindfulness is both taught by buddha and laterday teachers.
  • Wisdom of non-grasping is timeless. Compassion is relative to a context.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    What I was saying, Jeffrey, is that the Four Noble Truths, Mindfulness, and the Eightfold Path in general have been, and will most likely keep working for many generations to come. Stoning people to death was okay hundreds of years ago, but thats not okay anymore (at least in civilized nations).

  • The specifics of the 4NTs, Mindfulness and the rest of the 8 fold are unique to each person although the generalities are a guide and pointer. Every day is different..

    But I agree they will continue to work.

    I don't think stoning to death was correct even way back when.
  • Have you seen some of the photos coming out of Iran, Afghanistan, etc.? If stoning women is correct, and even required by law today, stoning anyone to death was likely to be correct way back when.
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited February 2011
    I would like to remind all to give due respect to the traditional form of Buddhism.
    When did westerners start learning and practising Buddhism?
    Prior to that Buddhism has been preserved and transmitted in conservative Asian societies for over 2000 years. Without that conservative tradition, westerners would not even have the chance to learn Buddhism.
    Members who dismiss or critique their way of doing things would do well reevaluate themselves.
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited February 2011
    Buddhism has changed over time, to the point of there being countless traditions & understandings. Often, what is called "traditional Buddhism" is arguably Buddhism losing its way. I personally have not noticed anyone on this forum pushing a "Westernised" form of Buddhism. Generally, the various Buddhist views on this forum have their roots in Asia.

    In the 20th century, most noteably in Thailand, Buddhism modernised & broke "tradition". For example, if we read the website of the Supreme Patriarch of Thailand, it presents teachings that break "tradition".

    Similarly, in the 20th century, Tibetans such as Lama Yeshe broke "tradition" and began teaching Westerners.

    The reality is, in many conservative Asian societies, Buddhism became undifferentiable from the underlying Brahminism/Hinduism. It is arguable these societies did not preserve the purity of the Buddha-Dhamma.

    Kind regards

    DD

    :)
  • Buddhism has changed over time, to the point of there being countless traditions & understandings. Often, what is called "traditional Buddhism" is arguably Buddhism losing its way. I personally have not noticed anyone on this forum pushing a "Westernised" form of Buddhism. Generally, the various Buddhist views on this forum have their roots in Asia.

    In the 20th century, most noteably in Thailand, Buddhism modernised & broke "tradition". For example, if we read the website of the Supreme Patriarch of Thailand, it presents teachings that break "tradition".

    Similarly, in the 20th century, Tibetans such as Lama Yeshe broke "tradition" and began teaching Westerners.

    The reality is, in many conservative Asian societies, Buddhism became undifferentiable from the underlying Brahminism/Hinduism. It is arguable these societies did not preserve the purity of the Buddha-Dhamma.

    Kind regards

    DD

    :)

    Exactly, I think its very important to constantly question what is true Dhamma, and what is cultural baggage. Just because something has been passed down for generations doesn't mean it has to be respected per se.

    Its important in my opinion to constantly try and scrutinize every bit of information as rationally as possible; never let respect get in the way of that.

  • @newstatesman
    You stole my thunder.
    Tradition is dogmatic and to cling to it is not what Buddhism is about.
    I'll wear my kilt at weddings, I eat haggis (veggie) on burns day etc because these types of tradition in the correct context are fun. Holding ones beliefs based on tradition is entirely different.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    I smile inwardly at hermitwin's methodology:

    "light blue touchpaper and stand well back".

    I would remind hermitwin to never leave a firework unattended...... ;)
  • Because of traditionalists preserving most/all of the teachings, you are now able to pick and choose what you like, and discard what you dont.
    Will you offer the same opportunity to those that come after you?
    Or will you only offer them what you have selected?

  • This is a good point, hermitwin, but we still don't know what you're referring to when you say "the traditional form of Buddhism", and "critiquing and dismissing". Is this a reference to rebirth and/or karma? Or the rules pertaining to sexual misconduct (the only thing I've seen outright dismissed on this forum)? Or something else?
  • I would think he means any of the traditions, as they are taught.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    Because of traditionalists preserving most/all of the teachings, you are now able to pick and choose what you like, and discard what you dont.
    I dispute this strongly.
    Anybody earnestly following Buddhism does not 'pick and choose' what they like/don't like.
    Anybody earnestly following Buddhism will spend time evaluating what comes their way, what they learn, meditate, think upon examine and scrutinise.
    A Buddhist does not 'pick and choose'. A Buddhist adheres to those principles which resonate with him/her and practises them accordingly. A Buddhist is free to do this, because Buddhism does not require one adheres to every single principle presented, even within a tradition....
    Will you offer the same opportunity to those that come after you?
    Or will you only offer them what you have selected?
    Who are you talking to?
    Who is teaching?
    Who is offering....what?
    And even if something is 'selected' it is up to the pupil to not accept anything blindly.
    Isn't it?


  • hermitwinhermitwin Veteran
    edited February 2011
    Thanks Cloud.

    The question is posed to you, what would you preserve and what would you discard? For example, many people are uncomfortable with what Buddha said about ordination of women and additional rules for nuns. Would you discard that?
    This is just one example and by no means the most important one.
  • What did the BUddha say about ordination of women? From what I understand, some of the additional rules for nuns were for their own protection.
  • @frederica

    Well said Sir. Well said.
Sign In or Register to comment.