Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Sharon Stone and the unskilful interpretation of karma

zidanguszidangus Veteran
edited March 2011 in Buddhism Today
First of all those who don't know this story may like to read the link below.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/may/28/news.chinaearthquake


Just a point really, feel free to add further comment if you wish.
Anyway, It's rather unfortunate that the Buddhist notion of karma has been totally, misunderstood and misrepresented by the actress Sharon Stone, in recent comments attributed to her regarding the recent earthquake in China which may have killed up to 67,000 people. I do not know if it is true when she claims the Dali Lama is a good friend of hers, but it would be a bit worrying if this is true, since she seems to be taking glee from the fact that an earth quake, which as I have mentioned may have killed up to 67 000 innocent people, may be retribution for actions taken by their goverment. I suggest she speaks to the Dali Lama again or some other bhikkhus to improve her understanding of the Buddhas teachings of karma.

Metta to all sentient beings

Comments

  • This makes no sense. Many of the earthquake victims were Tibetan. Does Stone have any idea what she's talking about?
  • zombiegirlzombiegirl beating the drum of the lifeless in a dry wasteland Veteran
    god, i wish i could tell sharon stone that she basically just supported the same concept that brought some extremist christians to say that 9/11 was caused by what they viewed as america's wrong path and acceptance of homosexuality. i wonder if she would still think that the world works this way.
  • This happened in 2008. Things have moved on. Why are we still hung up on this? I think she issued an apology at one point or another for the statements anyway.
  • Thanks for that Dorje, I noticed this thread and thought "Huh? Did Stone put her foot in her mouth yet again? Was it the New Zealand quake this time?" Yeah, this is a very old story.
  • This is new to some of us.
  • This happened in 2008. Things have moved on. Why are we still hung up on this? I think she issued an apology at one point or another for the statements anyway.
    Well it was brought up on the bbc news in the UK a few days ago, and I did not know about these comments beforehand. I just think it was a very misguided thing to say.

    Metta to all sentient beings

  • Yes I know it may be new to some of you, but looking at the date of the article, it should trigger some further investigation, shouldn't it?

    I mean, just look at the Robina Courtin thread. Does it require someone to spoonfeed her info to anyone when a quick Google would bring up more than enough information?
  • I don't second-guess members' motives for opening a thread, criticize their choice of topics, or investigate to see if it's a timely topic; I take the topic at face value.

    It's been suggested more than once that those opening a thread include enough info in their OP to enable people to comment without having to do individual research. It's a practical suggestion, and a courtesy on behalf of members who may not be on top of all the relevant personalities and events worldwide.
  • Well it may have been old news to you, but to me, it was new, and I was making a comment on it, I don't need to google the information as I found out this a few days ago. I was merely giving my comment on her misinterpretation of karma. Hope this helps.


    Metta to all sentient beings
  • zidanguszidangus Veteran
    edited March 2011
    Yes I know it may be new to some of you, but looking at the date of the article, it should trigger some further investigation, shouldn't it?

    I mean, just look at the Robina Courtin thread. Does it require someone to spoonfeed her info to anyone when a quick Google would bring up more than enough information?
    Just to give you some relevant up to date news, the Sharon Stone story was mentioned in the news report I had seen because she is or was ( I don't know for sure) paid by Christian Dior to promote their products, and after her comments she was pulled from the chinese Chrisitan Dior campaign. Ok thats ancient news, well to you anyway, so here is the up to date news which kind of connects it, the connection was that John Galliano was sacked by Christian Dior over an alleged racist and anti-Semitic attack, and this is the reason it was shown on the news, and hence the reason I first seen the Sharon Stone remarks.
    So although the remarks are a few years old, if the story is to ancient for you to care about, then if anything it is a good example of the Dependent Origination of all things, in this case the thread and indeed this post.

    Metta to all sentient beings

  • edited March 2011
    I'm not second-guessing anyone's motives. However, we should always remember that the only permanent thing is impermanence. And it would do all of us some good to do some background research on some of the things we post because it makes the forum a lot more easier to read, and not cluttered by topics which have been discussed before.

    Like this one which originated from Simonthepilgrim in May 2008
  • edited March 2011
    This is a good suggestion, generally speaking, but according to zidangus, the BBC felt justified for whatever reason in bringing the issue up again, which triggered his interest. Also, we should bear in mind that researching old threads is extremely difficult with this new format, Vanilla. I've messaged Lincoln about this (I haven't been able to get the "search" function to turn up any threads I'm looking for), and he said he's working on it. He sounded as though it's a long-term project to bring the search function up to speed. I see you managed to get it to work, dorje, congrats. Others haven't been so fortunate. :-/
  • Once again, Google is your best friend. "Sharon Stone Newbuddhist" and everything comes up.
  • zombiegirlzombiegirl beating the drum of the lifeless in a dry wasteland Veteran
    it was new to me as well. *shrugs* i don't think i'm "hung up on it" because i never knew about it to begin with. i hardly think that one thread posted 3 years ago constitutes it being an overly discussed topic. if it's not new to you dorje, you don't need to comment.
  • Once again, I'm just saying that I think before posting anything it would do everyone some good to do a little research and give your own opinions on the issue.
  • The real question is - do I care what Sharon Stone says?
  • Thank you for posting the link, @dorje. It is good to be reminded of old friends and to find that, even though the story had faded into the attic clutter of my memory, I still feel the same way about the "karma=it's your own fault" equation.

    Lovely, too, to be reminded of old friends and conversations long gone. Where are they now, @Knitwich, @Knight of Buddha? We "tired the sun with talking and sent him down the sky", didn't we?

    On, rather than off, topic, I think that we must expect more and more slipshod use of Asian terminology as it passes into mainstream discourse. The same thing has happened with psycho-analytical language: the writings (cinema, novels and journalism) of the first half of the 20th century certainly show a process of popularisation and widening (and betrayal) of meaning.

    We have had many a conversation about karma, without, I would add, coming to many firm conclusions. For myself, I have reflected long and hard on the notion of the Imponderables. Not on this or that particular Imponderable (the workings of karma, the origin of all things, what a Buddha is and where I am on my journey) but at the way in which I join in with the modern, 'democratic' dislike of being told not to think about some specific thing.

    It is such a human trait: the need to make patterns and find causes. In another poem, Albert and the Lion, a dramatic monologue, Albert's father, after his son was eaten by the lion, says "Somebody's got to be summonsed". We are more comfortable, faced with disaster (or triumph - another poem: one your favourite, I think, @Federica), if we can blame or praise someone, a person preferably. Having lost a 'God' on whom to fix our pain, we look for other 'reasons'. We blame "-isms", the authorities or we name individuals. This is particularly true when we feel helpless as confronted by large-scale suffering.

    The Buddha said that reflecting on individual Imponderables sent us mad. It is the madness of the whirlpool that drags us down into dukkha of our own making. And it is recursive: we can blame ourselves for rafting into the maelstrom, and then bloame our parents/teachers/enemies or friends. and so on, ad infinitum.

    I heard Anne Widdecombe (a British ex-minister and outspoken person) say that, on the day she learned that she had been appointed to the Department of Health, she shocked a reporter who asked her what the Conservative position was on health reform by telling him that she had to read the brief first. Bing able to say "I don't know" was the first lesson that our Philo. teacher tried to instill - in 17-18 year olds? Some chance! But 'celebrities' like Ms Stone are expected, by some mysterious osmosis denied to the rest of us, to make sense, instantly, of events.

    And, of course, we can then blame them! Round and round, and down and down we go.



  • For those among us (myself included) who like to know references and attributions, here they are for my last post:

    References:
    1 - "tired the sun with talking and sent him down the sky": Heraclitus, poem by William Johnson Cory:

    They told me, Heraclitus, they told me you were dead,
    They brought me bitter news to hear and bitter tears to shed.
    I wept, as I remembered, how often you and I
    Had tired the sun with talking and sent him down the sky.

    And now that thou art lying, my dear old Carian guest,
    A handful of grey ashes, long long ago at rest,
    Still are thy pleasant voices, thy nightingales, awake;
    For Death, he taketh all away, but them he cannot take.


    2 - Albert and the Lion


    3 - "faced with disaster (or triumph - another poem: one your favourite, I think, @Federica), "
    IF.....
    Rudyard Kipling

    IF you can keep your head when all about you
    Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
    If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
    But make allowance for their doubting too;
    If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
    Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
    Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
    And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:

    If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;
    If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim;
    If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
    And treat those two impostors just the same;
    If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
    Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
    And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:

    If you can make one heap of all your winnings
    And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
    And lose, and start again at your beginnings
    And never breathe a word about your loss;
    If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
    To serve your turn long after they are gone,
    And so hold on when there is nothing in you
    Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'

    If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
    ' Or walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch,
    if neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
    If all men count with you, but none too much;
    If you can fill the unforgiving minute
    With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
    Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
    And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son!


    4 - "the workings of karma, the origin of all things, what a Buddha is and where I am on my journey":
    AN 4.77: The Unconjecturables http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.077.than.html


  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited March 2011
    Isn't Poetry wonderful?
    There's little to beat a really good piece of poetry....

    (talk about off-topic!! :D)

    (incidentally, 'Heraclitus' is as poem my mother finds extremely poignant, since my father died back in October....)
  • zidanguszidangus Veteran
    edited March 2011
    Once again, I'm just saying that I think before posting anything it would do everyone some good to do a little research and give your own opinions on the issue.
    Thank you for noticing, that is exactly what I did when I started this thread, that is do a little research and then give my comment on Sharon Stones remarks.
    If the topic was covered on this forum beforehand, then fine, but I did not join this site until 2010 and did not know about the comments until a few days ago. Anyway I think its every ones right to start a thread on what they like even if it has been discussed beforehand, I mean how many threads on this site about rebirth, I imagine a lot, but I bet each and everyone of them have excellent posts, which contribute the discussion.


    Metta to all sentient beings
  • edited March 2011
    I find it sad when the initiator of a thread needs to repeatedly justify his/her choice of topic. This has happened several times recently. Is it really so difficult to either respect people's topic choices, or simply leave them alone for others to enjoy?
  • The Jewel Ornament of Liberation says that bad breath is caused by lying in a past life.
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    @Jeffrey, Funny. :)
  • It appears reasonable to conclude Sharon's understanding is indicative of the teachings she receives.

    How many Buddhists believe if you a standing on a footpath and are struck by a wayward motor vehicle that is due to some negative past karma?

    I have read this on New Buddhist many times.

    For example, generally followers of the following website hold such views: http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/index.html
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited March 2011
    We gotta remember the Buddha's only concern was teaching how suffering arises and ceases, and a path to lead toward its cessation. A lot of things people didn't know in those days were given supernatural explanations and are included in a lot of texts (just like with any religion). If we find something through our own investigation to be the actual case, that supersedes superstition (such as bad breath mentioned above, we know the causes and conditions through medical science).

    The Buddha encouraged this investigative mind, as I'm sure he saw all those beliefs that people were clinging to as unsupported, but wouldn't have had an audience if he become the authority on "everything". So instead he became the authority on suffering and its cessation alone, everything he taught was geared toward that end. :) IMO of course.
  • The Jewel Ornament of Liberation says that bad breath is caused by lying in a past life.
    Sadly Gampopa didn't have Wikipedia !

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halitosis
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited March 2011
    OFF-TOPIC:
    halitosis was a word grabbed and used by the manufaturers of Listerine mouthwash.

    Halitosis, or bad breath, is not a medical condition in and of itself, but always a symptom or side-effect of another condition. Therefore, bad breath cannot be treated, until the cause is eliminated. Therefore, 'bad breath' as a treatable condition - doesn't exist.

    'Listerine' was first commercially and publicly marketed as an industrial detergent, primarily for floors. (originally, it was a surgical sterilizing fluid, for use in operating theatres. When other better and improved products took its place, it went public....)
    The formula, once it was subsequently marketed as a breath freshener, didn't change one bit.
    Use 'listerine', and basically, you're rinsing your mouth with industrial-strength floor cleaner.
  • It appears reasonable to conclude Sharon's understanding is indicative of the teachings she receives.

    How many Buddhists believe if you a standing on a footpath and are struck by a wayward motor vehicle that is due to some negative past karma?

    I have read this on New Buddhist many times.

    For example, generally followers of the following website hold such views: http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/index.html
    No doubt a lot of Buddhists believe this, however, I don't think there would be many Buddhists who would cite the Chinese governments stance on Tibet the cause of an earthquake which killed innocent people who had no involvement in their governments decisions.
    The karmic effects may work in ways in which none of us truly understand, but I believe that the effects are only evident for the person who actually created the karma. So for me, and I think for the overall majority of Buddhists there is no connection between the earthquake and the stance of the Chinese government.


    Metta to all sentient beings

  • 'Therefore, 'bad breath' as a treatable condition - doesn't exist.'
    Bad breath is an important symptom in traditional chinese medicine. And yes it is treatable. I was cured of it.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited March 2011
    Quite right - with emphasis on the word symptom. And I studied TCM as part of my shiatsu course. Halitosis is a symptom of an associated problem. Nor a condition on its own. Cure the source, and treat the symptom, but not bad breath on its own. Don't tell me... Stomach channel? Lung channel?

    Sorry, this is OT. My bad.....
    Please respond in a PM. Thanks.
Sign In or Register to comment.