Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Does the present moment exist?

edited April 2011 in Buddhism Basics
I had a meditation experience about this a few months ago and was wondering what other's thought...

When most of us think of "the present" we typically think of a short period of time relative to our current experience defined by the boundaries we put on a specific event or task. For example, when you're eating dinner you might define the present as the time you begin eating and the future (which presumably ends the present) as the time after you are done eating. But you can divide up the present into smaller and smaller pieces, minutes, seconds, milliseconds, etc. and each division can be further defined in terms of past and future on into ad nauseum.

In Buddhism, we stress focusing on the present moment. Meditation is all about being present, watching what's happening NOW. So I ask, does the present moment even exist?
«1

Comments

  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    Future does not exist, nor the past (rather, just remnants of the past). ALL that exists is the present.

    Or... so I've heard.
  • I read a book by the Dalai Lama (Ethics for the New Millennium) and it stated that there is no such thing as the present. There isn't since when ever your brain thinks "now" is the present that moment has already past and is now in the past and no matter how small a time you get it will never be in the present and always in the past.
  • i think that things are being taken far too literally here. in buddhism when we are taught to remain in the present, we are basically being reminded not to dwell on yesterday or what will happen tonight or tomorrow. does 2 seconds make such a difference. if you dwell on this in meditation you may become hindered i guess
  • edited April 2011
    if you dwell on this in meditation you may become hindered i guess
    Let me explain.
    I wasn't literally thinking about this logically or literally during meditation. Rather, I had the experience of it and watched how it felt to be a person constantly moving from past to future. It was an acute awareness of time and my relationship with it. It wasn't until after my meditation session that I made a mental construct of my experience to satisfy my naturally clinging mind and explain it to others.

  • I take it that when you feel sensations that is the present. When you hear a sound and become one with hearing you are in the moment. When you think "ah, its a dog barking" then you are out.
  • you are always in the moment, even if you think you're otherwise. the thinking can only occur in the moment. like we think about the future or past or imagine something, but that is all happening in this moment.

    no matter how hard you try you cannot escape this moment. like even abstracting this moment into concepts can only be done in this moment.

    there is only this moment. hahaha
  • Now is not a moment in time. Now is ongoing. Now is constantly flowing.
  • of course it exists, if it did not exist, then nothing would exist.... it is just as soon as you contemplate the present moment, it has gone. You can try to measure it into as many fractions of a nanosecond as you wish, but it will still be the past and therefore cease to exist. It is pretty unimportant IMO to contemplate the present moment in a manner of seconds, but as Phoenix said he felt the sensation during a meditation so i guess that is different.
  • Existence doesn't really enter into it. The key fact is that the present is all we're directly aware of. Everything else is an inference or a conjecture.
  • Why does it matter if my brain respond 2 seconds later to the information so I can't call it present...? Sometimes I just think this analyzing goes to far. I think it can become dangerous to dehumanize us like this. We can become depressive or even detached completely to natural response.

    I think it can be good to analyze your mind but in a soft way like seeing impermanence of your feelings and thoughts, how we create and project our suffering. But the most important thing is to practice compassion, joy, humanity and humility for others. There is so much anger, stress and conflicts in the world and I think the best way is not to detache from it and analyze to much. This world needs our care. :rolleyes:
  • you are always in the moment, even if you think you're otherwise. the thinking can only occur in the moment. like we think about the future or past or imagine something, but that is all happening in this moment.

    no matter how hard you try you cannot escape this moment. like even abstracting this moment into concepts can only be done in this moment.

    there is only this moment. hahaha
    I think that best sums up my own thinking. Yes, the present moment exists. In fact, it's all that exists, like ThailandTom says. I think what you're wanting to think about is our concept of duration. We think of time as something that comes in lengths and can be measured in chunks. One second, one minute, one hour, one lifetime. So when it comes to the present, it is a point of time that the entire universe is traveling on. How long does the present last? Forever and no time at all, both at once. Since our entire universe is traveling on this wavefront, the present is all there is for as long as the universe lasts. But the present is also a moving point with no duration of its own.

  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    you are always in the moment, even if you think you're otherwise. the thinking can only occur in the moment. like we think about the future or past or imagine something, but that is all happening in this moment.

    no matter how hard you try you cannot escape this moment. like even abstracting this moment into concepts can only be done in this moment.

    there is only this moment. hahaha
    That is true. Now, whether or not one is aware of this, is another story altogether, hehe. :) You can't escape this moment, but you can escape awareness of it. That is what TV is for. :)

  • xabirxabir Veteran
    No, even the present moment has no inherent existence.

    That is why many teachers have not really comprehended emptiness, when they say things like "only the Now exists".



    "The mind of the past is ungraspable, the mind of the future is ungraspable, the mind of the present is ungraspable."

    ~ Diamond Sutra
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited April 2011
    i'm with Xabir on this one

    for me, the notion of 'the present moment' is illusion & beguilement

    the illusion of the present moment passes away very quickly

    like, "now" (woops! its gone already) i will type "this" in what I tried to make the present moment

    but the moment in which I typed that "this" in the last sentence is gone

    forever

    :bawl:


  • Even so, we need some frame of reference for paying attention to awareness in the here and now.

  • Well spoken

    :)
  • I disagree. To say it doesn't exist is as problematic as to say that it does. The key thing is that the present moment is all that we're directly aware of. Everything else is inference or conjecture, including existence or non-existence of any particular object.
  • Yeah, the present doesn't exist. I think I would frame as focusing on what is right in front of you at this moment.
  • how can the present moment not exist, please explain this to me someone. i am aware that what i type now was in a moment which no does not exist, but when i was typing it, surely it existed otherwise i would not be typing it or in existence... emptiness is not existing, merely empty, am i wrong?
  • Well it "exists" of course, but it's just a concept in your mind. It HAPPENED. But you can't think about being in the moment and actually BE in the moment at the same time. So in a sense, you are never really aware you are in the moment...only after you stop being. Just like in meditation. While you are in the moment you just flow WITH it. So you don't exist because you ARE in the moment. You aren't thinking about time, you aren't thinking...you are just riding the present moment wave.

    That's why people describe living in the now as accessing the infinite. Time is a mental construct in our head. A reference system with which to measure and analyze our world. When you stop THINKING, there is no time.

    Just as when you stop using a ruler and in thinking in terms of inches....there are no inches.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited April 2011
    According to Nagarjuna:

    The three times are marks that establish eachother. Since none of them have no substance in them selves they cannot really establish eachother. Therefore each of the three times is insubstantial and created by the mind.
  • then that would lead to the notion of consciousness creating reality...
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited April 2011
    Time is not reality is my point. My teacher says only things outside of time are real. Buddha went beyond birth and death. If he was subject to death then he would be suffering. But his nature was beyond and he saw.

    Lama Shenpen Hookham: Anything that manifests in time is manifestation and relative only…………it has no ultimate Reality.
  • So wait a moment, I am trying to understand this, anything that has a concept of time or involves time is not real? It is only an idea constructed by the mind? So what is the ultimate reality, this is pretty deep for me seeing as I have fallen off the path for a while and my mind has been pretty damn clouded
  • If you videotape yourself. Play it back, pause it. Is that not a moment you are looking at ?
  • The concept of time was created by human beings and so we are mentally conditioned to function within it in terms of "past", "present" and "future".

    Enlightenment is beyond the mind's conditioning.

    regarding Dhamma, Buddha said :

    "the Dhamma is visible in the here-&-now, timeless, inviting verification, pertinent, to be realized by the wise for themselves."

    An 6.47 Sanditthika Sutta: Visible Here and Now

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an06/an06.047.than.html
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    In Zen, there are the four propositions:

    It exists.
    It does not exist.
    It both exists and does not exist.
    It neither exists nor does not exist.

    Thinking/concepts/beliefs cannot unravel such a ball of yarn. Only realization and actualization will do the trick.
  • that is zen, and from what i have gathered about zen buddhism it seems to be kind of like a slack, contradicting hippish school, just my opinion
  • the now is just as valid as the past or future. a thought or a dream is just as valid as reality as it is.

    it's all empty of "inherent existence".

    but from the start if one realizes the present moment, they have a greater chance to realize that even this moment is empty. there is just infinite potential and the actualization of that infinite potential.
  • taiyakitaiyaki Veteran
    edited April 2011
    zen is basically a non-dual teaching. just like practically all mystics and spirituality.

    the idea is to use logic to destroy logic. so you assert all positions, then you negate all positions.
    thus you are saying everything and at the same time saying nothing.

    Silence > concepts > Silence.

    the idea is that concepts are fragmenting and pointing to truth. where as the silence is the truth. not the idea of silence but the actual silence. or rather since the silence doesn't exist outside or inside but rather in being. not a being but being.

    so when a person says the present moment or now only exists, they are referring to what is in front of them. not the idea of the now or present, but reality as it is. because when you get down to it, that is the only thing we know for sure. everything else is speculation & theory.

    the only thing i know for sure is that there is awareness of what is in front of me right now. there is only awareness. but even that is empty.
  • the now is just as valid as the past or future. a thought or a dream is just as valid as reality as it is.

    it's all empty of "inherent existence".

    but from the start if one realizes the present moment, they have a greater chance to realize that even this moment is empty. there is just infinite potential and the actualization of that infinite potential.
    you have had a deep realization of this yourself? or this subject in general? i am curious that is all
  • yeah this is from my own personal experience, so I could be wrong. thus I am here talking to you guys to make sure I am not deluding myself Lol
  • The present has zero duration—it's a point, not a span—so motion, thought, and change can never occur in the present alone. To experience time, you must mentally combine the past and future. As a mental construct, the nature of time will be different for everyone.

  • i listened to some talks by bashar and he has a theory that there is constant static realities and motion/time/duration is created by infinite static parallel realities.

    think of a film strip and how there are single frames. these single frames are moved very fast and we get motion pictures.

    the idea is that there is an infinite amount of static realities and when we perceive change or motion or time, we are just going through an infinite amount of parallel realities.

    it's an interesting concept to think about. idk if i am giving it justice though ha
  • how did you come about this realization taiyaki.... I understand what is being said, but that is not realising. now that i have stopped taking valium and begging a new start, i can again start my practice, which first began over 2 years ago
  • Taiyaki, I agree with your/Bashar's static parallel realities idea. It fits with the concept of the present having zero duration.
  • edited April 2011
    The attachment to worlds causes the being to enter another world. In the mind only view of reality the worlds are actually created by the minds of the people in the world. Even in mind matter dichotomy clearly our relationship to the world and our desires are influenced by karma.

    This is actually relative truth to uproot eternalism or nihilism and to be moral.
    This is a quote from a different post, but it seems fitting. Eternalism and nihilsm. The present is all there is and all there every will be, yet, like taiyaki said, it is completely empty. It is but a vessel to be filled by our experiences.
  • mostly self-inquiry and opening up to feeling the stillness from the neck down. within you right now is a nothingness and that is where concepts do not go. there is no boundary or defining characteristics to this nothingness. i suppose you could call it a stillness or openness. that nothingness has always been there your whole life and always will be. think of it as like the sky. in this sky there are clouds, which could be thought of as thoughts and feelings and such. the constant is the nothingness or the sky which is always there. then you realize that this nothingness is aware of itself. so nothingness is aware of nothingness.

    just keep going back to that nothingness, don't interpret it. don't label. just feel it from the neck down in your body. feel the spaciousness. breathe in and breathe out. from there consciousness can flower.

    check out adyashanti and listen to all of his videos. don't think about it. don't use your intelligence. just open up to it. let it sit in your body and heart.

  • Being in the present moment also limits us from a lot of chatter that is distracting and upsets us.
  • Tom basicly 'present' only has a meaning due to the notion of past and future. And past and future likewise. Since they are only supported by eachother and have no substance in themselves, thus they are impermanent composed of parts and merely mental designations. All conditioned phenomenon is like this:

    'I am not, I will not be.
    I have not, I will not have.
    This frightens all children,
    And kills fear in the wise.'
    Nagarjuna

    Samadhi Raja Sutra

    Know all things to be like this:
    A mirage, a cloud castle,
    A dream, an apparition,
    Without essence, but with qualities that can be seen.

    Know all things to be like this:
    As the moon in a bright sky
    In some clear lake reflected,
    Though to that lake the moon has never moved.

    Know all things to be like this:
    As an echo that derives
    From music, sounds, and weeping,
    Yet in that echo is no melody.

    Know all things to be like this:
    As a magician makes illusions
    Of horses, oxen, carts and other things,
    Nothing is as it appears.
    The Buddha
  • that is zen, and from what i have gathered about zen buddhism it seems to be kind of like a slack, contradicting hippish school, just my opinion
    wow.....just wow.
    Apparently you don't know very much about Zen then.

  • yea, 'from what I have gathered' I do not know much about zen, you are correct. I never said I did.

    I understand that thinking or contemplating the present moment, or even any aspect of buddhism for that matter is pointless unless practiced. But, if you are meditating, you are focusing your mind which requires thinking, I do not understand how to 'open up' and 'let it sit in your body and heart'. If you stop thinking, surely you are classified as dead
  • I think I would frame as focusing on what is right in front of you at this moment.
    The Buddha framed it like this

    :bowdown:
  • yea, 'from what I have gathered' I do not know much about zen, you are correct. I never said I did.

    I understand that thinking or contemplating the present moment, or even any aspect of buddhism for that matter is pointless unless practiced. But, if you are meditating, you are focusing your mind which requires thinking, I do not understand how to 'open up' and 'let it sit in your body and heart'. If you stop thinking, surely you are classified as dead
    you have to learn the distinction from what is aware of a thought and the thought.
    so when you are meditating there is awareness. then a thought appears. then there is awareness of the lack of thought or the awareness right after thought. think of awareness as you sitting down watching a movie and thoughts and feelings as things on the movie screen. you watch them come and go without judgement or commenting.

    the idea is to keep your emphasis on the background after/before thoughts. or the nothingness. or the stillness. whatever the hell you want to call it. the gaps between thoughts and feelings. its in those gaps where consciousness can flower.

    by opening up i mean to kind of relax into it. like open yourself up physically to it by breathing and expanding your chest. and even intellectually open up to the possibility of learning something.

    i assure you that you won't die if you stop thinking. thinking is secondary to the function of consciousness. consciousness is the standard and constant, where as thinking comes and goes. you are always conscious, thus it is the most intimate and overlooked part of the human experience. it's so simple that it's almost difficult to realize it.

    wish ya luck brother
  • pegembarapegembara Veteran
    edited April 2011
    The present moment doesn't truly exist! For as soon as you hear a sound, the actual event is already over. Sound takes time to reach your ear drum and then change to electrical impulse reaching the auditory cortex before you are even aware of it.

    As soon as you note the sound the original event is over. You can only know what arises in your consciousness. Past, present and future are only concepts, not reality.

  • From a practical perspective that is still just a fabrication. The key factor is to attend to arises in direct awareness. Fabrications about existence or non-existence aren't a productive focus for identification. So again, it's not that the present exists or doesn't exist. The question is a red herring.
  • There is only seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, tactile sensations and thinking.
    Everything else is a dependent coarising.

    Quote:

    "'Everything exists': That is one extreme. 'Everything doesn't exist': That is a second extreme. Avoiding these two extremes, the Tathagata teaches the Dhamma via the middle: From ignorance as a requisite condition come fabrications. From fabrications as a requisite condition comes consciousness. From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-&-form. From name-&-form as a requisite condition come the six sense media. From the six sense media as a requisite condition comes contact. From contact as a requisite condition comes feeling. From feeling as a requisite condition comes craving. From craving as a requisite condition comes clinging/sustenance. From clinging/sustenance as a requisite condition comes becoming. From becoming as a requisite condition comes birth. From birth as a requisite condition, then aging & death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair come into play. Such is the origination of this entire mass of stress & suffering.

    Kaccayanagotta Sutta
  • edited April 2011
    So many thoughts and words here in this thread ...

    Relax, let them all go, awareness is now !

    :)
  • Thanks taiyaki, it has helped me somewhat to understand this topic a little more and to get back on the wagon so to speak
Sign In or Register to comment.