Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Whose Buddhism is Truest?
Comments
Tantra works on a different level of being than the other yanas, and renunciation is not required, it's more about transformation and integration. It does depend upon what precepts your teacher says you should follow though. Dzogchen in the nyingmapa tradition has no such inherent requirements, as it's a practice that utilizes Tantra, but also transcends it. You'd have to have some ground work of study and experience in it to have a real understanding about it. In the stories of Tantric Mahasiddhas, there are many examples of times where they were able to drink endless amounts of alcohol and not get drunk, or even take poison and not be poisoned. Even Hindu Tantric sages had the same kind of abilities, like Neem Karoli Baba who took the entire sheet of Ram Das's pure grade acid and he didn't even flinch, and kept meeting people, and talking with people in his normal way. These experiences from so called intoxicants, if one has a degree of depth in Tantric experience, working with ones personal energy levels, can actually be helpful to ones practice and deepening awareness of the nature of mind. Now, I'm not talking about going out and being a drug addict or addict of any sort. I think you brought up a very interesting topic.
I did quit beer, sex, movies, etc. for many years for the sake of intense internal alchemical (tantric) practice. Went on frequent retreats, etc. It was a phase in my inner evolution I've had a few times, and it may become a phase again?
The Buddha was not nearly as dogmatic as many make him out to be. He taught Mahayana towards the end of his preaching carrier after all, and even transmitted it from higher realms to those of deep awareness to be disseminated here on Earth. Of course, if one is a Theravada person, there is disagreement. I'm ok with that, as different strokes for different folks. But, plenty of Theravadins have this idea that only there Buddhism is true and pure, even though more and more proof is arising through anthropological digs that reveal this to be an out dated dogma without any informed validity.
Also, you say you don't approve of stimulants? Such as energy drinks filled with caffeine and many other "stimulants?" You admitted to drinking them. So, I don't see any need for high horses.
And, it has nothing to do with being a high horse. I simply don't approve of alcohol or non-prescribed drugs. Both for religious reasons and because there was a lot of alcoholism in my family when I was growing up.
All the best.
All the best,
Todd
lol i am the worst buddhist. hell i'm not even a buddhist.
i'm into dudeism. that involves white russians and taking it easy dude.
no more foot sores broski.
Yourself? lol