Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Buddhism in extreme suffering. Some light please.
Hello newbuddhist community
.
What you guys think about this?
Could you achive enlightenment/emptiness or stay in a joyus state if you only left your mind?. Lets say you have an accident and your bodie ends up dismembered, desfigurated and you are blind, practically a scenario in wich you only left your thoughts some hearing and speak. This strikes me to be a great test and will like to know if you can reach joyful state of mind in this case.
Thanks beforehand ill appreciate your answers
.
PS: Sorry for my english
0
Comments
It would eventually become easier to achieve enlightenment.
That person would awaken to truth, where as everyone else are living in the illusuion.
Take cancer patients for example.
It not them who eventually mentally suffer, its people who are going to miss them if they die.
People who are dieing end up being completely fine awake and ready and therfore their suffering ends..
Hard to explain and I bet very hard for some to accept and realize: hence why they suffer.
X
Buddhism is all about mental suffering.
Therefore ANYONE can achieve happiness, enlightenment, etc etc...even if they have no legs,arms,eyes, have cancer, loses everything etc etc.....its still possible. JUST LET GO AND FREE YOUR MIND. X
Thank you very much for your answers . Buddhism is really something amazing, that freedom it gives its like the ultimate freedom and joyfulnes. Really aprecciate your answers, ill start looking for a place where to find a buddhist master here in my country.
Thanks again many many thanks
There is something called locked in syndrome where a persons mind is intact but due to some stroke or accident they can't move their body except maybe one eye or a finger: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked-in_syndrome
I asked him if he were dead; surely he must be a ghost. He said he was not dead, but had left his body on the other side of town, and he went on happily talking about everybody and everything at the wedding. It was fun listening to his stories. He said he was the groom's father, and that he surely was not dead, but that he just had to come to his son's wedding. When I did not believe him, he laughed and said that he could just as well ask me if I were the one who was dead, because I was seeing and talking to him! I indignantly told him that one of us here certainly must be dead and that it certainly was not me! He doubled over with laughter.
I found out a week after the wedding that the reason why the groom's father was not present at the wedding with the groom's mother because he was a very old man, extremely ill and completely incoherent, feeble, and bedridden from late stage Alzheimers disease across town at the time of the wedding.
Can somebody still living but completely bedridden and mentally and physically completely incapacitated end up looking like an 18 year old ghost laughing, joking, telling stories, and mingling among guests at a wedding miles away from where his ancient body lies helplessly silently motionlessly in bed on the other side of town?
I would not have believed that was possible, but I asked his widow after his funeral 6 months later....
and I found out that everything he had told me was correct, including the fact
that he had been underage and had lied about his age, and so had indeed flown planes in World War II...and the words he had said "sounded just like him!"
So...is it possible to be a physically and mentally completely incapacitated old man...and yet simultaneously be some manner of ghost happily laughing, joking and mingling among people at a wedding, looking and dressing like he did at age 18 while his ancient feeble body was essentially lying in silently in a hospital bed across town?
I would say that is what I observed.
uses each experience and state for the benefit of others. So whether it is anger or bliss, each tool is used to help another being.
Does suffering happen to one who has realized the true nature of reality? Yes, but he/she does not label it as suffering. It is what it is. The body decays because it also is impermanent. Is there pain? Sure, but such a being accepts such pain. Seeing reality as it is means that being accepts reality as it is. All the pain, all the bliss, and all the stuff in between. The whole human experience is valid and there are no hierarchies to experiences/states.
metta
If one can successfully cultivate this mind, then no matter what befalls them, even if it is a horrible accident, they will not be moved internally. They will simply accept it as it is, and because of this, will most likely expect a fortunate rebirth upon the cessation of the body.
-Tikal
But it is not the same as the spiritual quest.
The spiritual quest is on another level altogether,
Spiritual wine has a subtler taste.
The intellect and the senses investigate cause and effect.
The spiritual seeker surrenders to the wonder.
-Rumi.
The buddha gains wisdom and he/she understands how reality functions. The Buddha also completely accepts what is. In that acceptance is his/her immunity to everything. In ones willingness to be vulnerable to everything, they become invincible. From here the buddha can take all of the worlds suffering and transform it into compassion. A balance of heart and mind. Wisdom and acceptance.