Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

5th precept questions

Hey guys I just starting practicing buddhism fairly recently and I have a couple of questions about the 5th precept.

First, I'm curious about how I've seen the precept worded on some websites. I'm not quoting any one site, but I've the 5th precept written as something like "avoid intoxicants which cause a lack of mindfulness and make you more likely to break the other precepts." So my question is: Is moderate consumption of alcohol acceptable as long as I remain mindful and careful that I don't break the other precepts? Also, does alcohol consumption itself cause negative karma?

Secondly, I have ADHD and take adderall for it. Taking adderall helps me in so many areas of my life and it's a valid medical treatment so I'm wondering whether adderall falls under the 5th precept. I don't consider adderall an "intoxicant" by any means but it definitely alters brain function so I'd appreciate opinions on how it relates to my practice of buddhism.

And please, no ignorant comments about adhd or its medication.
Thanks in advance for the help.

Comments

  • If it helps you then it's not harmful. If it harms you in any way then you might be breaking a precept by taking it.

  • The precepts are "training rules." They aren't commandments. They are used to help train oneself to be a kinder, more mindful, alert, and compassionate individual. Medicine is not an intoxicant. Drinking is not evil, but is very difficult to control. Most people don't know their limit.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran


    First, I'm curious about how I've seen the precept worded on some websites. I'm not quoting any one site, but I've the 5th precept written as something like "avoid intoxicants which cause a lack of mindfulness and make you more likely to break the other precepts." So my question is: Is moderate consumption of alcohol acceptable as long as I remain mindful and careful that I don't break the other precepts? Also, does alcohol consumption itself cause negative karma?

    Secondly, I have ADHD and take adderall for it. Taking adderall helps me in so many areas of my life and it's a valid medical treatment so I'm wondering whether adderall falls under the 5th precept. I don't consider adderall an "intoxicant" by any means but it definitely alters brain function so I'd appreciate opinions on how it relates to my practice of buddhism.

    I think the answer is no alcohol. People will say, "I have just one drink to relax." So, obviously, even one drink begins to alter thinking. I'm not sure one can draw the line where "heedlessness" begins.

    I've never heard a reliable person describe a true medication as an intoxicant, even if it has that effect.

    This does demonstrate, however, how interpretation comes into play.

    No one should denigrate you because of having ADHD. I was a school principal and worked with many kids with this medical condition. However, I was not aware that ADHD drugs and alcohol "mix".

  • aMattaMatt Veteran
    Drinking clouds the mind. The point of the practice is to become more clear. The answer is staring you in the face, its up to you to decide where you're at and what to do. Drinking a few beers isn't going to send you spinning into a animal-like mind, but even small amounts dilute your clarity.

    Remember, these are just instructions on how to become clear, rather than commandments that a wrathful deity will punish you for breaking. If you wish to drink in moderation, go for it... just be observant of your mind before, during and after. When and if you shed it as an action, it will happen without confusion, without longing.
  • edited August 2011
    Secondly, I have ADHD and take adderall for it. Taking adderall helps me in so many areas of my life and it's a valid medical treatment so I'm wondering whether adderall falls under the 5th precept. I don't consider adderall an "intoxicant" by any means but it definitely alters brain function so I'd appreciate opinions on how it relates to my practice of buddhism.

    And please, no ignorant comments about adhd or its medication.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Legal prescription medication which is part of a doctors medical treatment doesn't break the precept about intoxicants.

    .
  • Ok so the consensus is that alcohol should be completely avoided if possible but legal prescriptions are fine? That was my thinking, but I was curious as to how others interpreted the precept against intoxicants. Thanks.
  • Ok so the consensus is that alcohol should be completely avoided if possible but legal prescriptions are fine? That was my thinking, but I was curious as to how others interpreted the precept against intoxicants. Thanks.
    Yes, although many would agree with you about alcohol. If you can truly just have one drink without becoming heedless, many say "no harm, no foul".

  • Secondly, I have ADHD and take adderall for it. Taking adderall helps me in so many areas of my life and it's a valid medical treatment so I'm wondering whether adderall falls under the 5th precept. I don't consider adderall an "intoxicant" by any means but it definitely alters brain function so I'd appreciate opinions on how it relates to my practice of buddhism.

    And please, no ignorant comments about adhd or its medication.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Legal prescription medication which is part of a doctors medical treatment doesn't break the precept about intoxicants.
    .
    I understand why you would say this, but when it comes down to the details I struggle to find a grounding for it. The best I can do is to say that the Drs are putting the brain chemistry back into a "default" position. The problem I have with this argument is each person is slightly different, so what is default? and the drugs being used are rather nebulous in their nature. They work, but they aren't exactly sure of mechanisms.

    The end result on the brain is the same If I smoke pot for pain vs if I do it to get high, so what is the difference? Is it intent? If so, then is it right intent to want to be rid of pain, is it right intent to get high to get rid of pain, is it right intent to get high to get rid of pain that wasn't diagnosed?

    I guess this all points to the fact that there is no steadfast rule, but only your right view and right intention (is this following your intuition?).
  • I like sanisthouk's answer but keep in mind alcohol is physically addictive, impairs judgement and thus your vision of how it is helping or harming is not often clear.

    Prescription medications you have the support of a physician and also its not taken as you need but according to a daily regimen. Alcohol would probably be fine if you took it as a prescription one glass of wine or beer daily.
  • aMatt says it in a way that makes it so clear to me. If the goal is clarity I don't think too many people would argue that beer increases that though my ex and ex alcoholic did say she couldn't take exams without being drunk :orange:
  • @Jeffrey That makes sense, but our ego can convince us that we are seeing more clearly than we truly are.

    On more than one occasion I have smoked marijuana and thought I had insights only to realize that it was just ego. That being said, I have been able to successfully meditate while stoned. I don't think I can become enlightened while stoned or while I continue to use pot, but it is interesting to practice in another state of mind. Just like trying to meditate when angry, depressed, or just physically ill. I will shed this when my practice is advanced enough.

    Alcoholics' bodies have learned to function with that new factor. Is this a form of attachment?
  • aMattaMatt Veteran

    Alcoholics' bodies have learned to function with that new factor. Is this a form of attachment?
    That is a different paradigm, tolerance or adaptation. It is formed from attachment, but calling it a form of attachment doesn't really capture what is happening physically in my opinion.
  • I think deep down inside we all know exactly what the precept means. Use common sense and DON'T TRY AND BEND THE RULES. So... Don't drink alcohol and don't take recreational drugs.

    Intent is everything. Period!

    Namaste
  • @aMatt Physically the body is trying to establish homeostasis to function what it would consider normally, right?

    @bodha8 My point is that aren't people trying to escape the pain of life with recreational drugs? What is the difference between that escape and taking pain pills or medication to relieve the suffering? The intent is the same, avoid painful situations.
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited August 2011
    So many hairs, so much splitting!

    I don't care if the doctor wrote you a little slip of paper or not, many drugs they prescribe are *certainly* intoxicants. In fact, by the strict definition of the word, *any* drug is an intoxicant, since all are toxic to some degree or other. But I'm splitting hairs too. However, many drugs definitely alter your mental status, and so would fall under the same heading as recreational drugs (many of which are prescription drugs, abused) and alcohol.

    The individual human response to such chemical compounds is so variable however, I don't think it's up to anyone to say that the 5th precept is an outright ban on taking anything that might in any way alter your mental status. I can drink a small glass of wine or a beer (but no more) and have absolutely no adverse effects whatsoever. Some people can take half a sip of a beer and be blotto. It's all individual.

    Just like Buddhism, come to think of it. There are no "thou shalt nots" in Buddhism, as far as I'm aware. Just use your good judgement.
  • Mountains so do you think people on prescription drugs should cease taking them in order to be better buddhists?
  • No, I didn't say that. I'm just saying that you can't draw a distinction because a doctor wrote on a slip of paper, that's all. I'm not advocating taking or not taking anything, including alcohol. My point was, everybody is different, and I don't think the dharma says you absolutely can't do anything.
  • A drug is simply a chemical. In a sense, a drug is no different to the food we eat. And like food, some of it is potentially toxic (eg sugar), whilst some of it is indeed very helpful to our bodies.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    ...It's all individual...

    Just like Buddhism, come to think of it. There are no "thou shalt nots" in Buddhism, as far as I'm aware. Just use your good judgement.
    While I agree there are no "shalt nots" in Buddhism, if everyone is simply going to use their own "good judgment" (something many people don't have to begin with), no sense in having the Precepts.

  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited August 2011
    Hey guys I just starting practicing buddhism fairly recently and I have a couple of questions about the 5th precept.

    First, I'm curious about how I've seen the precept worded on some websites. I'm not quoting any one site, but I've the 5th precept written as something like "avoid intoxicants which cause a lack of mindfulness and make you more likely to break the other precepts." So my question is: Is moderate consumption of alcohol acceptable as long as I remain mindful and careful that I don't break the other precepts? Also, does alcohol consumption itself cause negative karma?
    Here's some of my thoughts about the fifth precept, if you're interested.
    Secondly, I have ADHD and take adderall for it. Taking adderall helps me in so many areas of my life and it's a valid medical treatment so I'm wondering whether adderall falls under the 5th precept. I don't consider adderall an "intoxicant" by any means but it definitely alters brain function so I'd appreciate opinions on how it relates to my practice of buddhism.

    And please, no ignorant comments about adhd or its medication.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    No, I don't think that Adderall falls under the fifth precept, especially since it's a type of legally prescribed medication used to increase one's focus and shouldn't lead to carelessness if used as directed.

  • aMattaMatt Veteran
    @aMatt Physically the body is trying to establish homeostasis to function what it would consider normally, right?
    Sometimes, though the physical response is varied by substance. I'm not a doctor.

    @Mountains - it seems the hairs you're splitting are in the wrong direction. Perhaps a focus on the heedlessness would be more helpful, because almost every food (even sunlight) cause shifting chemicals in the brain that could be intoxicating. However, purposly causing the mind to be heedless is something one can overcome with practice. Maybe the precept could be read as "Not intentionally making it harder to be awake." :)
  • @aMatt I like that interpretation a lot, puts things in better perspective to me. It makes more sense in the context of preparing the soil for the seed.
  • edited August 2011
    Seemed that the discussion is on those who already suffering mental and physical pain that is still relying drug prescription, and begins to embark on buddhism meditation to cure suffering and attain enlightenment. Happiness does not come from drinking alcohol, otherwise, it a must for all. Buddha and the sangha then never drank it. The precept is moderated for accomodativeness because there is no sin for drink lest sin is done when mind is intoxicated. In fact, why there is a need drink alcohol, it can't solve your pain, but aggravate the pain further :p
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    So my question is: Is moderate consumption of alcohol acceptable as long as I remain mindful and careful that I don't break the other precepts? Also, does alcohol consumption itself cause negative karma?
    why do you want to drink alcohol to begin with?
    ...It's all individual...

    Just like Buddhism, come to think of it. There are no "thou shalt nots" in Buddhism, as far as I'm aware. Just use your good judgement.
    While I agree there are no "shalt nots" in Buddhism, if everyone is simply going to use their own "good judgment" (something many people don't have to begin with), no sense in having the Precepts.

    :clap:



  • A PRECEPT IS GOOD WHEN IT CAN BE EXPLAINED AND QUESTIONED but who is making these rules? no joke who really and historically wrote these precepts? somebody knows?personaly i think that to be forced to follow some precepts is not good and to follow them blindly also.. can we do whithout the precepts and if somebody chooses to ignore their obligations is he a worst buddhist?
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    A PRECEPT IS GOOD WHEN IT CAN BE EXPLAINED AND QUESTIONED but who is making these rules? no joke who really and historically wrote these precepts? somebody knows?personaly i think that to be forced to follow some precepts is not good and to follow them blindly also.. can we do whithout the precepts and if somebody chooses to ignore their obligations is he a worst buddhist?
    Who's FORCING you to do anything?
    NOBODY.

  • Why do you teach a child not to hit people?
    Is that a precept you want to your child to live by?
    A PRECEPT IS GOOD WHEN IT CAN BE EXPLAINED AND QUESTIONED but who is making these rules? no joke who really and historically wrote these precepts? somebody knows?personaly i think that to be forced to follow some precepts is not good and to follow them blindly also.. can we do whithout the precepts and if somebody chooses to ignore their obligations is he a worst buddhist?
  • Hey guys I just starting practicing buddhism fairly recently and I have a couple of questions about the 5th precept.

    First, I'm curious about how I've seen the precept worded on some websites. I'm not quoting any one site, but I've the 5th precept written as something like "avoid intoxicants which cause a lack of mindfulness and make you more likely to break the other precepts." So my question is: Is moderate consumption of alcohol acceptable as long as I remain mindful and careful that I don't break the other precepts? Also, does alcohol consumption itself cause negative karma?

    Secondly, I have ADHD and take adderall for it. Taking adderall helps me in so many areas of my life and it's a valid medical treatment so I'm wondering whether adderall falls under the 5th precept. I don't consider adderall an "intoxicant" by any means but it definitely alters brain function so I'd appreciate opinions on how it relates to my practice of buddhism.

    And please, no ignorant comments about adhd or its medication.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    The short answer is, there are variations in how the traditional Precepts have been taught in various schools of Buddhism. Some schools even use 8 instead of 5 precepts. I've seen a few lists that drop the intoxicant precept entirely and substitute "avoid buying and selling guns".

    The precept always puts "that cause heedlessness" or "lack of mindfulness" and one reason is because the rules were first laid down in a time when drinking the water of even your own local community could be dangerous and they knew it, although they didn't know why. They certainly knew drinking the untreated water on their travels could cause massive illness. If you travel today, you still need to keep that in mind. So, people back then often drink weak wine or something else brewed. But getting drunk was as much a problem then as now. A monk who got drunk and acted foolish made everyone look bad.

    As for your medicine, there's a reason the term "recreational drugs" is used to denote the difference between medicine and just going on a joyride.
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited August 2011
    A PRECEPT IS GOOD WHEN IT CAN BE EXPLAINED AND QUESTIONED but who is making these rules?
    The Buddha made them. A worthy, honorable & perfectly self-Enlightened being. Consummated in knowledge and behavior, totally transcended, expert in all dimensions, knower of all worlds, unsurpassable trainer of those who can be tamed, both teacher & guide of gods as well as of humans, blessed, exalted, fully awakened & enlightened. The wisest wise man of them all. It's impossible to not blindly follow him when we ourselves are blind to begin with.

    :)
  • aMattaMatt Veteran
    edited August 2011
    A PRECEPT IS GOOD WHEN IT CAN BE EXPLAINED AND QUESTIONED but who is making these rules?
    The Buddha made them.
    ...and their wisdom has been confirmed and observed by thousands. They start as a "rule" and end as a "duh". :)
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    A PRECEPT IS GOOD WHEN IT CAN BE EXPLAINED AND QUESTIONED but who is making these rules?
    The Buddha made them. A worthy, honorable & perfectly self-Enlightened being. Consummated in knowledge and behavior, totally transcended, expert in all dimensions, knower of all worlds, unsurpassable trainer of those who can be tamed, both teacher & guide of gods as well as of humans, blessed, exalted, fully awakened & enlightened. The wisest wise man of them all. It's impossible to not blindly follow him when we ourselves are blind to begin with.

    :)
    This is just a question. Did Buddha make the Precepts? All of them or some of them? I don't know the answer.

  • The sutras list vows and precepts for monks and lay people, and claim the Buddha taught these to his followers and community.
  • santhisouksanthisouk Veteran
    edited August 2011
    If you practice the Buddhist form of meditation, it is important that you have virtues. No matter how long you can sit in meditation, if you are a constant breaker of the precepts, your meditation will be less powerful when compared to someone with strong virtues. That is what I believe. :rolleyes:
Sign In or Register to comment.