Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Can Buddhism studies be certified ?
I am NOT trying to cause any excitement here sincerely , yerderday I was just informed by one member here that Dalai Lama hold doctorate degree of Buddhism study . Honestly this is new to me ,since I never "involve" in Buddhism study before , I never know there are school or university giving courses or buddhism study even offer a "doctorate degree"...............
Can Buddhism study be certified ??????? I know we can certified a person as doctor if he know medicion but who can certified how much a person aware ??????
A doctor that acknowledge / respected by public for their knowledge in medicion perhaps having hunting as hobby . He in public is "knowledgeble" but in Buddhism perhaps he still un-aware his action of killing other living for fun...he in Buddhism just like a 2 years old baby that still does not aware and need time to learn .
Dalai Lama perhaps having knowledge of Buddhism history , expert in his local tradition but to "certified" him as an "expert" in Buddhism ?? I still need to learn .............
0
Comments
And trust me, most people will never be an expert of the self.
Do yourself a favour and study REAL buddhism which is in the heart...the best person to teach u buddhism is YOURSELF.
However there are degrees in almost anything now, one of my friends has a degree in comedy! Being certified doesn't mean you know anything more than somebody who isn't, it just means you have taken the time to get your knowledge and hard work formally graded and checked. In Buddhism this is pretty much redundant, since to become knowledgeable you need to study various things, but the main skill is practice. Meditation and attitude towards other people&animals is far more important that book-smarts.
Basically religious degrees are given to people who have vast knowledge of the religion they studied. In Tibetan Buddhism these people are known as "pandita", meaning "one who has accumulated vast amounts of knowledge". Many of these panditas are also translators, and they translate ancient Sanskrit sutras, tantras and commentaries into another language like Tibetan, Chinese, English, etc. These people are known as "lotsawa" meaning "translator".
So basically, a doctorate in Buddhism is nothing more than a recognition that you have great amounts of knowledge in Buddhist theories and are able to comment on the sutras, tantras and their commentaries. After all, every one knows that PhD means "Permanent head Damage".
Buddhism itself is a developmental system, it is not something taught to us by a tree or rock. When people say "there is no teaching Buddhism" it is, at its best, confusing knowledge and wisdom. There is no teaching the wisdom that comes from practice, perhaps, but there is teaching the practice.
The question I have is - why? If you are trying to make the point that we all need to follow our inner voices above all, great - we get it. But to discredit - or at least try to - all of the great teachers, past and present, surely does nothing beneficial for all of those (us) out here looking for some guidance from those who have been a little further down the path than we are.
It seems to me that you are aiming more towards nihilism than Buddhism, as Buddhism - at least as I have learned it - has ALWAYS revered great teachers : the Buddha, Nagarjuna, Shantideva, the Dalai Lama. I have to wonder, just what branch or school of Buddhism do you align with? It seems to be one that I have never encountered.
I hope you find what you are looking for, and I also hope that you can find a way to reach it without tearing down the guide rails for the rest of us.
Namaste'
Kwan Kev
If one day Dalai Lama and a " rocker" on the same street both witness a burning house with an old lady inside the house , perhaps Dalai Lama dared not to enter the burning house to save the old lady perhaps "the rocker " can.
Have you heard dolphin fish save fisherman life at sea , should we give "Buddhism doctorate degree" to the dolphin ??
Sometime I think , human are too ego to express their view and fail to digest Mr Siddharta teaching....sorry in advance
I just cant free myself from my current awareness that Buddhism is IMPOSSIBLE to be taught but all ( living and non-living) are knowing Buddha from each other . Please show me I am wrong as I fully aware that I need to move to higher awareness .....
and again...stop makes judgement about me.....is NOT FAIR to me....
From my awareness is enough to understand Mr Siddharta finding simply focusing on the word " BE AWAKE "......what makes you so sure you are using right text ?????
What makes you so-so sure he said this or that , or his teaching is this or that???
What makes you so sure even he existed or not ??
Mr Siddharta IS NOT IMPORTANT in Buddhism ANYMORE but the words " AWAKE" said coming from him is VERY IMPORTANT.....and whether is was a prince or a princess is NOT IMPORTANT ANY MORE......" Strive for your own liberation with diligence "....I want to belief he said that and whether true or not IS NOT IMPORTANT as in Buddhism it self THERE ARE NO RIGHT or WRONG , no TRUE or FALSE...show me otherwise...lets be open to discuss without any funny ill feeling ...thks
PS. The experiences you have during meditation should be your standard by which you judge the wisdom of any teachings, this is what I believe the buddha was saying when he said don't take my word for it.
Perhaps consider that goshiki doesn't know, and could if he let himself be taught.
This is a forever on-going process that cant be stop so by reading book written by "a teacher" is actually to gain his knowledge at time he written the book it could be years from the time we read it and by now perhaps "the teacher" had moved to higher awareness and his awareness had changed and the book is outdated even to him .
For example , today , now I am of the opinion that is impossible to teach Buddhism to others and I am "fully aware" of this and write a book about this.....perhaps after 6 months some member here had share his awareness to me and makes me aware that Buddhism can be taught and I had changed my perception and moved from my previous awareness....so what happen to those who read my book ??
We can write book on cooking , on sports even on sex but in search of BUDDHISM awareness of oneself cannot be written down as it must be a continue changing process .....if we defended all our "belief" , our "words", our "actions" that is ego , we must be ready to change , ready to learn /know at all time that is why in Buddhism there is no right and wrong.....is only aware or not....right or wrong is only ourself made policy in our current world and is never existed in Buddha
Perhaps I am still not reach to your awareness yet that buddhism can be taught but I am fully aware that I must always ready to learn from you or anything or everyone here.....but at this moment 0840am local time in Malacca Malaysia , I still not reach to your awareness yet . Is never and will never wrong to learn Buddhism even from a rock but is only wrong for a person declare himself as teacher even for Mr Siddharta who is only the introducer of this energy to mankind .
I must learn Buddhism from Dalai Lama same way I learn Buddhism from my daughter or my koi fish or from a pen on my table or from tree outside my window ...is only wrong for Dalai Lama to declear himself a teacher that could be regarded by others as referral to Buddhism . He or any other "great monk" even Mr Siddharta himself is at my current awareness impossible to be connected to Buddha in any possible way. His so call "teaching" is his own purification process on his own awareness , in his own method , on his own speed same like others countless living and countless non-living in this world and beyond that can be known or learn by us that should not be regarded as a "special case" in Buddhism . All of us , human , animal , viruses , trees , rock , water - living or non-living is same and equal in Buddhism as no one is higher than other ..That is my current awareness..please show me otherwise , I am ready to learn and change my awareness sincerely
Buddhism is not awareness. Its not "being awake." Buddhism is a system of cultivation and observation. If you'd read some books or listen to some monks, or even put down your preconceptions for a second, you'd probably see it.
But, buddhism teaches us how to do that in a skillful way. How to meditate, how to approach our mind skillfully, what morals help cultivate more mindfulness. It isn't just "sit and stare at the pet fish".
In my current awareness , there is no such thing as " a Buddhist' or practising Buddhism .....I still need to aware of this....by staring at my fish if I am ready to learn , I can learn alot of Buddha from it....the factor is I must sincerely accept the fish is same and equal as me and I am no greater than them and they can show me purity.......
Your english is very good. I have only learned chinese numbers some of them. Yut yee sam sung lok bot gow sup.... something like that (kung fu class).
DOES THAT TELL YOU ANYTHING????
You are consistently rubbing people the wrong way.
Here's why I think that's happening.
You have almost no knowledge of Buddhism, yet you are critiquing it.
My advice is to learn and ask questions, but not critique until you have a reasonable knowledge base.
We here debate and even argue sometimes. And some are very knowledgeable, and others of us have some knowledge and some experiences.
We are "decorating" Mr Siddharta and now Mr Dalai Lama......is never relate to my search of own Buddha...But as a busy body human that full of rubbish , that like to critise others , that like to argue I think this concept is wrong.
In all Buddhist website I was condemmed , critise even banned just because I told them I never read or listen to any monk talk or never study under any master , I never proud of that just simply believe there are countless way to learn. People really look down on me just because of that , they trying to feed me with all sort of referrals , text , scripture , meditation technic etc . That is not what I am looking for . if I want to "study" any monks talk , if I want to "study" what might Mr Siddharta " teaching" , I can search from internet since now I am quite good at it or buy a book written by a well known monk sit under a tree with beer beside and read ...
This is NOT what I want ......I just wish to learn awareness and infact I had learn alot here and in all buddhist website even in some site is just a few hours .
You see , 2000 years ago ASOKA suddenly changed his mind from being to war to peace . There must be alot of awareness he had learned that moved him from a evil man to a good man. That kind of awareness we must learn ok......
The only thing is that you guys are loosing respect! HHDL and pen!!! I don't even know what to say to this...delusion at its best!
Respect to your teacher who will save you from samsara...a pen won't save your a$$ from samsara...you won't compare your teacher with a pen. This is the most disrespectful thing ever...a pen is not even a sentinent being...lol
This is your samsaric mind talking, it is an unknowing mind.
We don't respect a pen. A pen is a pen, it is an object...thats all...
With all due respect, you are either a Boddhisatva playing with us or you are a very confused fool...
PS: I used fool not as an insult but it fits better in this context...
Some even like to think alot for Mr Siddharta , decorated him the way they like and wish for.....come on....let it be....let them "introduce" themself I sincerely dont think they need anyone to introduce him
Seems you are very comfortable with your belief not like me ...and I had learned from you seriously .
Anyway ,sorry if I had offended you , I never meant that .