Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Posted elsewhere, but I thought I would post it here as well:
As a matter of curiosity, I wonder:
Which, if either, would be better -- to conquer your fears or not to be afraid in the first place?
I don't mean this in some high-seat, spiritual or self-improvement way.
It's just a matter of curiosity.
0
Comments
conquering is seeing through a fear and seeing it for what it is. so there is a practical and straightforwardness to actually doing something about fear.
whereas just not having fears is not practical advice and for most people they don't have the tools and mindset to do such thing.
ultimately i do think that when we conquer by examining our fears with wisdom/compassion then the energy of fear dissipates. in that sense fear is no more. but such can only occur when we actively engage and allow fear in our lives.
so what is fear? on some level it is an attachment to self or desire.
how does one get rid of fear? just see clearly into the nature of the phenomena itself. in that seeing then fear goes away on its own.
thus fear can arise and it can fall, but it has nothing for you. it just is what it is. just another bubble.
Amen.