Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
In my studies on Buddhism I came upon contentment. This word kept arising with the word emptiness into my thoughts. I have started to control my emotions, as other literature has guided me. However, if i am to be content would i be content with any emotions that manifests itself, ie Anger, sadness, love, passion, joy, or should i be void of emotion, as to be empty. Please help me find the answer so i (and anyone else looking at this with similar thoughts) can come closer to enlightenment.
0
Comments
You should be content, to be content.
Contentment, I have found, is disturbed by attachment.
Emotional response is a response to stimulus.
Your response (whether emotional or otherwise) may be from a content state or from an attached state - it will have an effect on you and your environment whichever way you go.
I am not sure how to guide you to a state of no or void emotions - I have not experienced such a state - it seems incompatible with the human condition.
I can't say whether this is closer or further away from enlightenment.
Every emotion is your enlightenment. Every emotion is asking us to look at it nakedly without preconception, without concepts, without stories, without any connect the dots.
Every emotion prior to language is enlightenment.
If voidness of emotion is recognized then the emotion is felt totally, completely, nakedly, you become so vulnerable and the emotion teaches you.
On this path many are attached to form is emptiness.
We must see how emptiness is form.
All of these manifestation and truly inspiration is the display of the unborn buddha mind.