Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
What drew you to your school of Buddhism?
I'm studying Mahayana Buddhism and, in particular, I'm interested in Tibetan. I like how it retains the 4 noble truths & 8 fold path and yet has a deeply mystical element. A nice mixture of naturalism and metaphysicism.
What drew you to your school?
0
Comments
Kadampa.
Then I visited a monastery in the Thai Forest tradition, and found there wasn't too much superstition involved. So I stayed a while.
Then later I found there was a lot of superstition!
But by that time I was ok with that, and now I actually like it and believe some of it.
But what drew me to it first was the lack of mysticism, the practicalness of it, the down-to-earth directness. No secrets, no initiations, none of that. Just morality, meditation, and wisdom. Bare bones.
I really enjoy the Vajrayana path because it incorporates the Hinayana and Mahayana, which focusing on energy.
Dzogchen became more attractive because of the direction my practice has taken me. I was really into Advaita Vedanta and had lots of trouble reconciling Buddhism. So Dzogchen really brought a happy medium of the two traditions. Particularly the awareness teachings and how they relate to emptiness.
To be specific:
Vajrayana from Reginald Ray, Dharma Ocean.
Dzogchen from Chögyal Namkhai Norbu.
I've gotten past that a bit, but this is probably no surprise to people on the receiving end of my mini-sermons when I feel the force moving within me.
The YinYana don't let anyone join. They even threw out the founder for starting it. That is my sort of madness.
They say stuff like: . . . though I am not sure how they manage this without any good members . . .
. . . also their mantra is positive, easy to use and understand
Om Ya Ha Hum
ya=yes in german dutch and some classes of english
reversed it is ay=yes - Old english, some dialects, still used
Designed for Western usage, even though it uses OM HA HUM as the basis
Om Ya Ha Hum
if it was ja that might jar with Jah . . .
ya?
After a while of grudgingly getting up at half-past-stupid in the morning to go and continue my sleep upright on a cushion something clicked (at first it was in my back but later in my head). I have been more or less Buddhist in my outlook ever since, even though I don't call myself Buddhist or have any particular school.
But somewhere in all that, something happened.
I wanted less worship. Just to sit. Obviously, I floated toward the zen side eventually.
How exciting . . . :clap:
You applied a second coat?
How'd you like that?!
One lifetime is not enough. Eh, that's way OT.
I just couldn't put my finger on where it was wrong. I wanted to understand it.
Untill one day my then teacher explained "somethng can only be true when the opposite is also true"
That's when I knew where it was wrong, but it was too late then.
Did a few lay terms and retreats when R. Jiyu was still walking the cloister.
Still in contact with a number of folks from those days.