Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
I know this sounds like cliche, but there is only now. But there is more to it. We often project into the future. This is a bigger problem than thinking about the past, because at least the past really happened. But the future hasnt even arrived yet, so speculation/imagination is more dangerous than brooding over the past.
So the real obstacle to the now is the future ..... Past also, but only to an extent. The mind creates all kinds of scenarios and makes us act according to some imagined reality. This destroys the power of now.
0
Comments
so @betaboy is the real obstcle for you "change", not the "future"?
Thinking of the past or future is innately benign when all the other sense gates are given equal status.
It is only where a dominance of one sense gate (in this case, a thinking mind) obscures the incoming data from the other sense gates (sight, hearing, smelling, tasting & body awareness), that actually becoming isolated from the present becomes possible.
I think this is true in daily activities as in formal meditation.
At least you can know that you did your best when everything goes to shit.
The past is history
The future a mystery
Now is a gift
That's why we call it the present
On a more objective level, however, that may not be the case. The NOVA episode "The Fabric of the Cosmos: The Illusion of Time," for example, seems to me to be agreeing with the ancient Sarvastivadin idea of past, present, and future phenomena being simultaneously present or existing from the point of view of modern physics (an idea that's highly contested by some Buddhist schools, especially Theravada), or as Albert Einstein put it, that "the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion."
Who knows, maybe the Sarvastivadins (along with Parmenides and the Eleatics) had it right after all.
The now or 'the Watcher' is just a layer of conceptual thought.
One should not live in the moment at all times. The Buddha advised not dwelling (living) in the past or future. In fact there is not even a "now".
What and how can we know, what there only is?
The experience of being in the zone, here and now, very nice thank you . . .
is a jhana/samadhi experience. Not that uncommon.
Can you remove the experiencer from the Now?
'Not now' of course . . . :orange: