Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Attending NKT meditation/events - feel uncomfortableHi there, I'm new Before I start

2

Comments

  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Sorry, but this is total bullshit.
    Pabongkha was very politically active. He was jailed for trying to alter the kangyur and he made political moves to try to weaken the Rime movement in eastern Tibet.
    Many of his writings are around and eventually they will be translated and made public. At which point, people who defend him and the demon that he worshiped will have a whole lot of questions to answer.
    Whether or not he was a great master doesnt really matter and I dont really doubt that he was, but to deny his political controversies is either naive or a blatant attempt at concealing the truth.

    :( Your sectarianism isnt very pleasent to bear witness to.
    Shenpen raised some historical facts, and your response was to accuse him of doing so out of sectarian motives. This is an ad hominem attack of the most intellectually lazy variety.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    fivebells wrote: »
    Shenpen raised some historical facts, and your response was to accuse him of doing so out of sectarian motives. This is an ad hominem attack of the most intellectually lazy variety.

    Disputed so called facts with little if yet doctored evidence.
    And yes calling down peoples teachers As politicised demon worshippers happens to be very shameful. Sectarian...:(
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Disputed so called facts with little if yet doctored evidence.
    And yes calling down peoples teachers As politicised demon worshippers happens to be very shameful. Sectarian...:(

    You should stop drinking the Kool aid friend.

    To label someone who has gone out of his way to receive teachings from as many lineages as possible as a sectarian is just crazy.

    The simple truth is that you have been deceived, and that, is shameful.

    Maybe you should recognize the fact that the practice promoted by your cult has always existed for no other purpose than to violently oppose any and all non-Gelug teachers, practitioners, and teachings.
    Why would you choose to keep wearing the blinders and playing the victim?
    Your posts have cult red-flags all over them.
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Disputed so called facts with little if yet doctored evidence.
    If you don't believe someone's claims, the appropriate response is to ask them to back them up with citations or elaborations on their arguments.
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    And yes calling down peoples teachers As politicised demon worshippers happens to be very shameful. Sectarian...:(
    More ad hominem. What's your point?
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    You should stop drinking the Kool aid friend.

    To label someone who has gone out of his way to receive teachings from as many lineages as possible as a sectarian is just crazy.

    The simple truth is that you have been deceived, and that, is shameful.

    Why is one lineage not good enough for you ?
    Sectarianism, according to one definition, is bigotry, discrimination or hatred arising from attaching importance to perceived differences between subdivisions within a group, such as between different denominations of a religion or factions of a political movement.
    sectarian [sɛkˈtɛərɪən]adj1. of, belonging or relating to, or characteristic of sects or sectaries
    2. adhering to a particular sect, faction, or doctrine
    3. narrow-minded, esp as a result of rigid adherence to a particular sect

    n a member of a sect or faction, esp one who is bigoted in his adherence to its doctrines or in his intolerance towards other sects, etc.sectarianism n

    Seems like bashing prominent Gelugpa lineage Lamas qualifies as sectarian, Not to mention bashing their practises as well. you certainly show an intolerance at that. :(
    Where is the spirit of equnimity and compassion for others ? Surely with all the sects you've studied you must have perfected that by now ?
    Such a shame that continued language is used to justify your own intolerance toward those you disagree with.
    How sad, Oh by the way Phabongkhapa wrote some amazing works on Lam rim that you might like to take a look at particularly around the sections of cherishing others.

    Be well friend. :)
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Why is one lineage not good enough for you ?

    Seems like bashing prominent Gelugpa lineage Lamas qualifies as sectarian, Not to mention bashing their practises as well. you certainly show an intolerance at that. :(
    Where is the spirit of equnimity and compassion for others ? Surely with all the sects you've studied you must have perfected that by now ?
    Such a shame that continued language is used to justify your own intolerance toward those you disagree with.
    How sad, Oh by the way Phabongkhapa wrote some amazing works on Lam rim that you might like to take a look at particularly around the sections of cherishing others.

    Be well friend. :)

    I have read his lam rim works and they are quite good.
    Any lineage is sufficient but I want to be well informed, so I explored others. Actually, I was quite inspired by Tsogkhapa and the rime movement and that is why I made the decision to explore other lineages.
    What I am unwilling to tolerate is when someone has been given blatant misinformation that is entirely based on sectarianism and hatred and then tries to use that information to promote their cult or accuse others of sectarianism.
    You might not read it as such, but I actually have a great deal of compassion for you and others who have been spoon fed propaganda and blatant lies by the NKT and their supporters.
    I am confident that someday you will leave this nonsense behind.
    I only hope that the experience of being in a cult doesnt make you turn away from the dharma entirely.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    I have read his lam rim works and they are quite good.
    Any lineage is sufficient but I want to be well informed, so I explored others. Actually, I was quite inspired by Tsogkhapa and the rime movement and that is why I made the decision to explore other lineages.
    What I am unwilling to tolerate is when someone has been given blatant misinformation that is entirely based on sectarianism and hatred and then tries to use that information to promote their cult or accuse others of sectarianism.
    You might not read it as such, but I actually have a great deal of compassion for you and others who have been spoon fed propaganda and blatant lies by the NKT and their supporters.
    I am confident that someday you will leave this nonsense behind.
    I only hope that the experience of being in a cult doesnt make you turn away from the dharma entirely.

    Blatant misinfortmation ? I think not.
    It seems as if you know very little with regards to the actual lineage of the Gelugpa tradition, Or even what it was like before the personality of the Dalai lama took to the forefront. Such insults about the great Dechen Nyingpo bring heavy hearts upon all the gelugpa who hold him to be a primary benifactor and fully enlightened being.
    As for Je Phabongkhapa's apparent sectarianism it would be a blatent contridiction to accounts of his many disciples and great Gelugpa teachers of this age.
    Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

    Je Phabongkhapa Liberation in the palm of your hand

    The only nonsense that needs to be ceased is this continued Abandoning of Dharma by attacking the Lineage of Je Phabongkhapa and his disciples and their disciples in turn.

    It is a very sad day when Dharma practitoners forget how to practise... :(One of the most fundemental basis of training the mind stems from morale conduct, In such Right speech should always be maintained refraining from Harsh and divisive speech also entails training the mind, as well as refraining from speech that causes schisms within the Sangha as you are attempting to do by repeating unsavoury words against the NKT.

    A cult is a false or unorthodox religion, The NKT is none of this but rather the lineage teachings from Trijang Dorjechang, and principly Je Phabongkhapa the accusation you make also entails that all the other Gelugpa schools who follow the lineage as well...all having Je Phabongkhapa as their principle source of Dharma transmition are false or an unorthodox transmition of Dharma...:(

    Again you are acting in a Sectarian manner that is not befitting for a Dharma practitoner.

    Be well. :)
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Blatant misinfortmation ? I think not.
    It seems as if you know very little with regards to the actual lineage of the Gelugpa tradition, Or even what it was like before the personality of the Dalai lama took to the forefront. Such insults about the great Dechen Nyingpo bring heavy hearts upon all the gelugpa who hold him to be a primary benifactor and fully enlightened being.
    As for Je Phabongkhapa's apparent sectarianism it would be a blatent contridiction to accounts of his many disciples and great Gelugpa teachers of this age.



    The only nonsense that needs to be ceased is this continued Abandoning of Dharma by attacking the Lineage of Je Phabongkhapa and his disciples and their disciples in turn.

    It is a very sad day when Dharma practitoners forget how to practise... :(One of the most fundemental basis of training the mind stems from morale conduct, In such Right speech should always be maintained refraining from Harsh and divisive speech also entails training the mind, as well as refraining from speech that causes schisms within the Sangha as you are attempting to do by repeating unsavoury words against the NKT.

    A cult is a false or unorthodox religion, The NKT is none of this but rather the lineage teachings from Trijang Dorjechang, and principly Je Phabongkhapa the accusation you make also entails that all the other Gelugpa schools who follow the lineage as well...all having Je Phabongkhapa as their principle source of Dharma transmition are false or an unorthodox transmition of Dharma...:(

    Again you are acting in a Sectarian manner that is not befitting for a Dharma practitoner.

    Be well. :)

    Really weird response Caz.
    I'm not "attacking" the lineage of Pabongkha.
    I'm not "attacking" anyone.
    I am merely discussing Pabongkha's political involvement and gyalpo worship.
    Your post is nothing more than text book "we are being persecuted" cult nonsense.
    You are simply regurgitating what you have been told by a source that lacks any credibility.
    Someday you will reflect on your parroting and recognize how clearly you have been manipulated.
    There are so many legitimate Gelug sangha's with great teachers. Why would you so adamantly defend the one that is widely recognized as illegitimate and as a cult?
    The reason is that you are a victim.
  • edited August 2010
    Look, I won't beat around the bush. The NKT is a paranoid, guru-obsessed cult whose upper echelons believe the dalai lama is out to get them all. (but then, so did karma kagyu at one point) Why? Because of this issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorje_Shugden_controversy By all means, take my words with a grain of salt, and treat the views of either side with the skepticism they deserve. Just thought it was my duty to inform you before you get yourself into deep trouble in the Buddha's name. I've met people on the net whose lives were seriously messed up by these people. (and other Tibetan traditions, but I belong to a Tibetan tradition myself)

    Handle tantric practice with great care, and don't make irreversible commitments with a guru you've known for less than a decade. Yes, that's what the traditional texts say, ten full years.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Really weird response Caz.
    I'm not "attacking" the lineage of Pabongkha.
    I'm not "attacking" anyone.
    I am merely discussing Pabongkha's political involvement and gyalpo worship.
    Your post is nothing more than text book "we are being persecuted" cult nonsense.
    You are simply regurgitating what you have been told by a source that lacks any credibility.
    Someday you will reflect on your parroting and recognize how clearly you have been manipulated.
    There are so many legitimate Gelug sangha's with great teachers. Why would you so adamantly defend the one that is widely recognized as illegitimate and as a cult?
    The reason is that you are a victim.

    Again...Gyalpo worship Phabongkhapa propigated no such thing, By claiming such you are saying he has no authentic refuge ! The very stem of your accusation would have profound implications upon the whole Gelugpa tradition. :rolleyes:
    Im not as blind to beleive things simply because they are told to me unlike some i actually investigate the various claims and so forth, And personal experience sure as hell doesnt back up the BS claims from many saviour seekers who may have bad experiences with people because of their own projections ( Apologys to the ones who have had genuine misfortunes, No organisation is perfect ). Again you actually know very little about the Gelugpa if you remember into the past Geshe-la once had the approval of the DL even a forward in one of his own books. Your claims are baseless and out of repeated ignorance.
    Such a shame.

    Be well. :)
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    kurra wrote: »
    Look, I won't beat around the bush. The NKT is a paranoid, guru-obsessed cult whose upper echelons believe the dalai lama is out to get them all. (but then, so did karma kagyu at one point) Why? Because of this issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorje_Shugden_controversy By all means, take my words with a grain of salt, and treat the views of either side with the skepticism they deserve.

    It is a very complex issue, and not one to be considered lightly.

    I don't agree with hoping for the "passing" (death) of the Dalai Lama, thus ending the debate. My hope is that there will be a peaceful resolution to this controversy. If the Dalai Lama has spoken against these practices, there must be a reason.

    Those who promote violence against others because of their beliefs are not doing so in the name of the dharma, and I've never heard or read of an instance where the Dalai Lama advocated violence or hatred towards Shugden practitioners.

    It's a very sad situation.
  • edited August 2010
    fivebells wrote: »
    Shenpen raised some historical facts, and your response was to accuse him of doing so out of sectarian motives. This is an ad hominem attack of the most intellectually lazy variety.
    Sorry, but this is total bullshit. (snip) people who defend him and the demon that he worshiped will have a whole lot of questions to answer.

    Fiver, you are not being honest.

    You said caz's lineage guru was a demon worshipper and offered no evidence for such. he called that sectarian, and so it is.
  • edited August 2010
    You should stop drinking the Kool aid friend.

    To label someone who has gone out of his way to receive teachings from as many lineages as possible as a sectarian is just crazy.

    incorrect, it is possible to gain experience of the lineage represented by the NKT, but he has not done this. What reasons? sectarianism.

    The simple truth is that you have been deceived, and that, is shameful.
    unsubstantiated accusation
    Maybe you should recognize the fact that the practice promoted by your cult has always existed for no other purpose than to violently oppose any and all non-Gelug teachers, practitioners, and teachings.
    Why would you choose to keep wearing the blinders and playing the victim?
    Your posts have cult red-flags all over them.
    harsh speech, unsubnstantaited, angry name calling

    in short: not a great post

    However, it is good for people to actually see what goes on in this debate. Let's make it all public, let's see who is cultlike agressive and repressive.
  • edited August 2010
    fivebells wrote: »
    If you don't believe someone's claims, the appropriate response is to ask them to back them up with citations or elaborations on their arguments.
    Originally Posted by caz namyaw viewpost.gif
    And yes calling down peoples teachers As politicised demon worshippers happens to be very shameful. Sectarian...:(


    More ad hominem. What's your point?

    I think you do not actually understand the meaning of ad hominem.
    this post attacks sectarian and shameful behavior. ad hominem attacks the person.

    study up kid.
  • edited August 2010
    mugzy wrote: »
    My hope is that there will be a peaceful resolution to this controversy.
    Don't bet on it. :(
    mugzy wrote: »
    If the Dalai Lama has spoken against these practices, there must be a reason.
    Rule of thumb: Don't trust anyone "just because". His Holiness isn't above the use of rhetoric: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Tibet_%281950%E2%80%93present%29#Ethnic_composition
    mugzy wrote: »
    Those who promote violence against others because of their beliefs are not doing so in the name of the dharma...
    That's... debatable. It's actually a matter of skillfulness, but I'm sure we can all agree the current situation isn't doing much to help all sentient beings reach enlightenment.
    mugzy wrote: »
    It's a very sad situation.
    It's the classic Tibetan situation. This is what Tibetan Buddhism has always been like. Profound teachings embroiled in controversy because of human fallibility and involvement in politics.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    mugzy wrote: »
    It is a very complex issue, and not one to be considered lightly.

    I don't agree with hoping for the "passing" (death) of the Dalai Lama, thus ending the debate. My hope is that there will be a peaceful resolution to this controversy. If the Dalai Lama has spoken against these practices, there must be a reason.

    Those who promote violence against others because of their beliefs are not doing so in the name of the dharma, and I've never heard or read of an instance where the Dalai Lama advocated violence or hatred towards Shugden practitioners.

    It's a very sad situation.


    http://www.westernshugdensociety.org/video/dorje-shugden-documentary/
  • edited August 2010
    Really weird response Caz.
    I'm not "attacking" the lineage of Pabongkha.
    I'm not "attacking" anyone. I am merely discussing Pabongkha's political involvement and gyalpo worship.

    is this a credible statment?

    Shenpen says: "Maybe you should recognize the fact that the practice promoted by your cult has always existed for no other purpose than to violently oppose any and all non-Gelug teachers, practitioners, and teachings....Your post is nothing more than text book "we are being persecuted" cult nonsense....You are simply regurgitating what you have been told by a source that lacks any credibility....Someday you will reflect on your parroting and recognize how clearly you have been manipulated....Why would you so adamantly defend the one that is widely recognized as illegitimate and as a cult?....The reason is that you are a victim.....What I am unwilling to tolerate is when someone has been given blatant misinformation that is entirely based on sectarianism and hatred and then tries to use that information to promote their cult or accuse others of sectarianism....you and others who have been spoon fed propaganda and blatant lies by the NKT and their supporters."

    sure, that's not an attack, not at all! :lol:

    Isn't ironic, caz, that Shenpen has a quote about being civil in his own signature, yet can't practice what he preaches?
  • edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    is this a credible statment?

    Shenpen says: "Maybe you should recognize the fact that the practice promoted by your cult has always existed for no other purpose than to violently oppose any and all non-Gelug teachers, practitioners, and teachings....Your post is nothing more than text book "we are being persecuted" cult nonsense....You are simply regurgitating what you have been told by a source that lacks any credibility....Someday you will reflect on your parroting and recognize how clearly you have been manipulated....Why would you so adamantly defend the one that is widely recognized as illegitimate and as a cult?....The reason is that you are a victim.....What I am unwilling to tolerate is when someone has been given blatant misinformation that is entirely based on sectarianism and hatred and then tries to use that information to promote their cult or accuse others of sectarianism....you and others who have been spoon fed propaganda and blatant lies by the NKT and their supporters."

    sure, that's not an attack, not at all! :lol:

    Isn't ironic, caz, that Shenpen has a quote about being civil in his own signature, yet can't practice what he preaches?

    I know its not an attack.
    Whats your point?
    As far a the quote in my signature is concerned, I havent contradicted it.
    Just because I am willing to openly disagree with the brainwashing that cult members are being fed doesnt mean I am not civil.
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »

    Do you actually believe anything that is on that website?
  • edited August 2010
    Nah, I seriously doubt the HHDL is persecuting Shugden worshipers. (although anything's possible; the first step to knowledge is the admission of ignorance) My personal opinion is that both sides are dead wrong in this so-called "debate", but it's also an unfortunate truth that the modern NKT has become a harmful cult. I wouldn't recommend that organization to anyone with a clean conscience.
  • edited August 2010
    mugzy wrote: »
    It is a very complex issue, and not one to be considered lightly.

    I don't agree with hoping for the "passing" (death) of the Dalai Lama, thus ending the debate.

    are you suggesting that anyone here is ?
    My hope is that there will be a peaceful resolution to this controversy.
    wouldn't that be wonderful?
    If the Dalai Lama has spoken against these practices, there must be a reason.
    well, there is always a reason.
    Those who promote violence against others because of their beliefs are not doing so in the name of the dharma, and I've never heard or read of an instance where the Dalai Lama advocated violence or hatred towards Shugden practitioners.
    I've got some lovely videos to show you! the Dalai Lama has known that there is violence being perpetrated upon these people in his name, but he has never even said "what these people are doing is wrong, but don't attack them."

    He knows aboutit , and his not speaking out is tacit support. He has also encouraged people to ban them from hospitals schools and monasteries, and he is recorded saying such. he also levels vieled threats such as "it will be bad if as a last resort we have to come knocking on your doors..." and "It will be like the cultural revolution for you if you do not heed my advice..."
    It's a very sad situation.
    sad indeed.
  • edited August 2010
    I know its not an attack.
    Whats your point?
    As far a the quote in my signature is concerned, I havent contradicted it.
    Just because I am willing to openly disagree with the brainwashing that cult members are being fed doesnt mean I am not civil.

    my point is that it is an attack, as anyone can see.

    you certainly have contradicted your signature. No-one is disagreeing with your right to openly disagree, but since you are name calling we can say you are definitely not being civil.

    You are obviously emotionally involved, and so perhaps what I am saying does not convince you, but everyone who is not invested in the same way can see the clear truth of what I am saying.
  • edited August 2010
    kurra wrote: »
    Nah, I seriously doubt the HHDL is persecuting Shugden worshipers. (although anything's possible; the first step to knowledge is the admission of ignorance) My personal opinion is that both sides are dead wrong in this so-called "debate", but it's also an unfortunate truth that the modern NKT has become a harmful cult. I wouldn't recommend that organization to anyone with a clean conscience.
    He isnt.
    He asked that people give up the practice and he had very good reasons for doing so.
    The history of the practice is controversial, explicitly sectarian, and harmful.
    The persecution line is totally bogus.
  • edited August 2010
    Actually, there's no evidence that the DL's supporters are attacking Shugden worshipers. TBH, I have nothing but contempt for this debate. I'm outta here.

    If you people will take my advice, don't trust anything, and I mean ANYTHING either side says about this issue on face value.
  • edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    my point is that it is an attack, as anyone can see.

    you certainly have contradicted your signature. No-one is disagreeing with your right to openly disagree, but since you are name calling we can say you are definitely not being civil.

    You are obviously emotionally involved, and so perhaps what I am saying does not convince you, but everyone who is not invested in the same way can see the clear truth of what I am saying.
    You can read it as an attack if you wish.
    Name calling? I dont think so.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    is this a credible statment?

    Shenpen says: "Maybe you should recognize the fact that the practice promoted by your cult has always existed for no other purpose than to violently oppose any and all non-Gelug teachers, practitioners, and teachings....Your post is nothing more than text book "we are being persecuted" cult nonsense....You are simply regurgitating what you have been told by a source that lacks any credibility....Someday you will reflect on your parroting and recognize how clearly you have been manipulated....Why would you so adamantly defend the one that is widely recognized as illegitimate and as a cult?....The reason is that you are a victim.....What I am unwilling to tolerate is when someone has been given blatant misinformation that is entirely based on sectarianism and hatred and then tries to use that information to promote their cult or accuse others of sectarianism....you and others who have been spoon fed propaganda and blatant lies by the NKT and their supporters."

    sure, that's not an attack, not at all! :lol:

    Isn't ironic, caz, that Shenpen has a quote about being civil in his own signature, yet can't practice what he preaches?

    Unfortunatly So CC :(
    And with the Cult accusations as well, Very rude.
    Its such a shame to see Dharma practitoners violate Fundementals of right speech. :(
    And yes Shenpen that website is more then reliable for the documented abuses over the years.
    Please learn to be civil...name calling is not Buddhist please Dharma Brother practise in accordence with Right speech.
  • edited August 2010
    kurra wrote: »
    If you people will take my advice, don't trust anything, ANYTHING either side says about this issue on face value.
    Thats excellent advice.
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Unfortunatly So CC :(
    And with the Cult accusations as well, Very rude.
    Its such a shame to see Dharma practitoners violate Fundementals of right speech. :(
    And yes Shenpen that website is more then reliable for the documented abuses over the years.
    Please learn to be civil...name calling is not Buddhist please Dharma Brother practise in accordence with Right speech.
    Hmm. NKT is widely recognized as a cult.
    Not my accusation.
    That website is profoundly inaccurate both in terms of history and the current situation.
    Is pretty sad and scary that you actually believe it.
    You're getting quite good at playing the victim.
    Warren Jeffs would be proud.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Hmm. NKT is widely recognized as a cult.
    Not my accusation.
    That website is profoundly inaccurate both in terms of history and the current situation.
    Is pretty sad and scary that you actually believe it.
    You're getting quite good at playing the victim.
    Warren Jeffs would be proud.

    Very sad. If this is not you accusation why are you repeating it ? It would be no suprise if you have no personal experience with the NKT at all but are merely repeating rumours as most from E-sangha have been taught to do :eekblue:
    The point trying to be made Shenpen is that you are unfortunatly being conditioned to be Vitrolically sectarian and then pretend that what you say isnt ? Who has taught you such things ? It is not Buddhadharma. :(
    Saddening from the depths of my heart.
  • edited August 2010
    You can read it as an attack if you wish.
    Name calling? I dont think so.

    as you wish. We'll leave it to the individual to make up his or her mind.
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Very sad. If this is not you accusation why are you repeating it ? It would be no suprise if you have no personal experience with the NKT at all but are merely repeating rumours as most from E-sangha have been taught to do :eekblue:
    The point trying to be made Shenpen is that you are unfortunatly being conditioned to be Vitrolically sectarian and then pretend that what you say isnt ? Who has taught you such things ? It is not Buddhadharma. :(
    Saddening from the depths of my heart.
    Nice try Caz.
    Let me know when you decide to leave.
  • edited August 2010
    Thats excellent advice.

    agree.
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Very sad. If this is not you accusation why are you repeating it ? It would be no suprise if you have no personal experience with the NKT at all but are merely repeating rumours as most from E-sangha have been taught to do :eekblue:
    The point trying to be made Shenpen is that you are unfortunatly being conditioned to be Vitrolically sectarian and then pretend that what you say isnt ? Who has taught you such things ? It is not Buddhadharma. :(
    Saddening from the depths of my heart.

    caz

    the intersting thing is that he doesn't think he is being sectarian!'

    :rolleyes:
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    caz

    the intersting thing is that he doesn't think he is being sectarian!'

    :rolleyes:

    I know. :(

    manjushri_08.jpg
  • edited August 2010
    If I were denouncing a legitimate lineage or sangha, that would be sectarianism.
    Its really that simple.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    If I were denouncing a legitimate lineage or sangha, that would be sectarianism.
    Its really that simple.

    Ah i see thanks for making your views clear. :sadc:
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Ah i see thanks for making your views clear. :sadc:
    You're welcome.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    You're welcome.

    Does make you anyless sectarian though :tonguec:
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Does make you anyless sectarian though :tonguec:
    Absolutely.
    Ask me about any non-cult tradition of Buddhism and I will honestly tell you how I feel and it wont be sectarian at all. There may be things that i wouldnt agree with interpretation or doctrine-wise, but it wont be sectarianism.
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    are you suggesting that anyone here is ?

    Yes, you did - on your very first post, when you mysteriously showed up on the forum to defend the controversial topic at hand:
    crazycloud wrote: »
    With the passing of the Dalai Lama, you will see an end to this name calling and the traditions will go back to a harmonious co-existence.

    I don't know how else to interpret your statement.
    crazycloud wrote: »
    I've got some lovely videos to show you! the Dalai Lama has known that there is violence being perpetrated upon these people in his name, but he has never even said "what these people are doing is wrong, but don't attack them."

    He knows aboutit , and his not speaking out is tacit support. He has also encouraged people to ban them from hospitals schools and monasteries, and he is recorded saying such. he also levels vieled threats such as "it will be bad if as a last resort we have to come knocking on your doors..." and "It will be like the cultural revolution for you if you do not heed my advice..."

    sad indeed.

    I said there must be a reason; however I don't know what his reasons are aside from what I've read about. It's difficult to determine truth from fiction in matters like this. I'd like to believe that he will eventually speak out and unify the opposing groups. It is very complex and strange, but in the light of all the problems between China and Tibet, there are many issues I don't fully understand.
  • edited August 2010
    If I were denouncing a legitimate lineage or sangha, that would be sectarianism.
    Its really that simple.
    Legitimate in whose eyes? Yours?

    the tradition passed down from Trijang Dorjechang to Zong Rinpoche, Lama Zopa, Lama Yeshe, Geshe Rabten, Serkong Dorjechang, Domo Geshe Rinpoche Geshe Kelsang, Lati Rinpoche, Geshe Sopa, Gelek Rinpoche, Khen Rinpoche Losang Tharchin, Gangchen Rinpoche, Many Ganden tripas, many Sakys Tris, etc etc etc ......being called illegitimate by a practitioner of another lineage may as well be the definition of sectarianism.
  • edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    Legitimate in whose eyes? Yours?

    the tradition passed down from Trijang Dorjechang to Zong Rinpoche, Lama Zopa, Lama Yeshe, Geshe Rabten, Serkong Dorjechang, Domo Geshe Rinpoche Geshe Kelsang, Lati Rinpoche, Geshe Sopa, Gelek Rinpoche, Khen Rinpoche Losang Tharchin, Gangchen Rinpoche, Many Ganden tripas, many Sakys Tris, etc etc etc ......being called illegitimate by a practitioner of another lineage may as well be the definition of sectarianism.

    Thats not what I am saying at all.
    Some of those people are teachers of mine and the lineages of Tsongkhapa and Sakya Pandita etc. that they transmit are completely legitimate.
    I am only referring to the group known as the NKT and their current status.
    Also, what makes you think I am a "practitioner of another lineage"?
  • edited August 2010
    mugzy wrote: »
    Yes, you did - on your very first post, when you mysteriously showed up on the forum to defend the controversial topic at hand:
    In order to show you have integrity, please show where i express any hope whatsoever that the DL will pass, please.


    I don't know how else to interpret your statement.
    sure you do. It is a statement of fact that this will happen, there is not even the slightest suggestion that this is hoped for. I think you will try to "win" this debate at any cost, and it does not reflect well on your motives, I think.
    I said there must be a reason; however I don't know what his reasons are aside from what I've read about. It's difficult to determine truth from fiction in matters like this. I'd like to believe that he will eventually speak out and unify the opposing groups. It is very complex and strange, but in the light of all the problems between China and Tibet, there are many issues I don't fully understand.
    That would be great. May the Dalai Lama have a long and happy life filled with harmony. :)
  • edited August 2010
    Thats not what I am saying at all.
    Some of those people are teachers of mine and the lineages of Tsongkhapa and Sakya Pandita etc. that they transmit are completely legitimate.
    I am only referring to the group known as the NKT and their current status.

    but surely you understand that Geshe Kelsang and his orgainization the NKT is a past of that lineage? he is praised highly by his teachers like Ling Rinpoche and Trijang Dorjechang as a realized master.

    Surely if his own gurus approve of him you can go along?
    :)
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    the tradition passed down from Trijang Dorjechang to Zong Rinpoche, Lama Zopa, Lama Yeshe, Geshe Rabten, Serkong Dorjechang, Domo Geshe Rinpoche Geshe Kelsang, Lati Rinpoche, Geshe Sopa, Gelek Rinpoche, Khen Rinpoche Losang Tharchin, Gangchen Rinpoche, Many Ganden tripas, many Sakys Tris, etc etc etc ......being called illegitimate by a practitioner of another lineage may as well be the definition of sectarianism.

    I know for a fact that Lama Zopa Rinpoche is supporting the Dalai Lama in this matter and has ceased this practice.

    As I understand it, what the Dalai Lama said is that he will not give empowerments or initiations to those who continue to worship Shugden, but that people may choose to do so if that is their belief. How is that different from any other requirements or following other orders of a teacher? If a teacher says, "Don't do this practice if you wish to receive teachings from me," then you can continue to do so if you don't agree with it, but are choosing to move away from their teachings.

    The violence perpetrated towards Shugden practitioners by Dalai Lama supporters was not advocated by the TGIE as far as I know. Those who choose to be violent are acting in ways that is not supportive to the well-being or personal freedoms of others.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    Legitimate in whose eyes? Yours?

    the tradition passed down from Trijang Dorjechang to Zong Rinpoche, Lama Zopa, Lama Yeshe, Geshe Rabten, Serkong Dorjechang, Domo Geshe Rinpoche Geshe Kelsang, Lati Rinpoche, Geshe Sopa, Gelek Rinpoche, Khen Rinpoche Losang Tharchin, Gangchen Rinpoche, Many Ganden tripas, many Sakys Tris, etc etc etc ......being called illegitimate by a practitioner of another lineage may as well be the definition of sectarianism.

    I think he's made his views clear...The sectarian often dont know they are behaving in this way, and then deny they are behaving in this way, and then try to justify their behaving in this way by making ridiculous accusations when they cant defend their position of pretending that what they have just said is not sectarian.
    You where right though earlier Shenpen i shouldnt play the victim, Instead i should do as advised in Bodhisattvas way of life by repaying your harm by helping you.
    Now about to do a Tsog offering adding to prayer list to heal the sick.
  • edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    but surely you understand that Geshe Kelsang and his orgainization the NKT is a past of that lineage? he is praised highly by his teachers like Ling Rinpoche and Trijang Dorjechang as a realized master.

    Surely if his own gurus approve of him you can go along?
    :)
    That may have been the case before he caused a schism in the sangha.
    They are no longer a part of the mainstream Gelug sangha.
  • edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Now about to do a Tsog offering adding to prayer list to heal the sick.
    If you are implying including me in some way, please dont.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    mugzy wrote: »
    I know for a fact that Lama Zopa Rinpoche is supporting the Dalai Lama in this matter and has ceased this practice.

    As I understand it, what the Dalai Lama said is that he will not give empowerments or initiations to those who continue to worship Shugden, but that people may choose to do so if that is their belief. How is that different from any other requirements or following other orders of a teacher? If a teacher says, "Don't do this practice if you wish to receive teachings from me," then you can continue to do so if you don't agree with it, but are choosing to move away from their teachings.

    The violence perpetrated towards Shugden practitioners by Dalai Lama supporters was not advocated by the TGIE as far as I know. Those who choose to be violent are acting in ways that is not supportive to the well-being or personal freedoms of others.
    <sup id="cite_ref-48" class="reference"></sup>

    Regarding Kopan Monastery giving up Dorje Shugden practice, Lama Zopa also pointed out:
    This was done for His Holiness (The Dalai Lama). This does not mean that Pabongka Dechen Nyingpo, His Holiness Trijang Rinpoche, and His Holiness Song Rinpoche have made mistakes. It does not mean they are wrong. Nor does one have to look at the protector as evil. For us ordinary people it is difficult to judge, because we cannot see these lamas ’ minds. Another side of the teaching is that it is mentioned that the protector (Dorje Shugden) is an Arya Bodhisattva, a manifestation of Manjushri. So, then, there is also the risk of our creating very heavy karma in that context (by criticizing or abandoning this practice).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-48">[49]</sup>

    Lama Zopa's words.
  • edited August 2010
    That may have been the case before he caused a schism in the sangha.
    They are no longer a part of the mainstream Gelug sangha.

    How did he casue a schism in the sangha? It was the Dalai Lama who forbade the practices of his own root guru and banned those who held to their teachers advice, wasn't it?

    :rolleyes:
This discussion has been closed.