Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Attending NKT meditation/events - feel uncomfortableHi there, I'm new Before I start

13»

Comments

  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    In order to show you have integrity, please show where i express any hope whatsoever that the DL will pass, please.

    My integrity isn't on the line here, and I resent that accusation. You brought up the topic of the Dalai Lama's passing "ending the debate," which I interpreted as your endorsement that this would happen.
    crazycloud wrote: »
    It is a statement of fact that this will happen, there is not even the slightest suggestion that this is hoped for.

    This doesn't make sense. I think it's different to say you hope the dispute will be resolved than to say it will be resolved by the Dalai Lama's death. Your intention was not clear, and I don't appreciate being insulted for my interpretation.
    crazycloud wrote: »
    I think you will try to "win" this debate at any cost, and it does not reflect well on your motives, I think.

    Wow, that's messed up. I guess that trying to have an open discussion and explore the facts at hand is considered trying to "win" a debate. The only person here who appears to be concerned with "winning" is the one who is personally attacking the motives and integrity of those who point out different aspects of the issue.

    I personally do not want to win anything, so if you consider this some kind of contest you can just declare yourself the winner right now and stop posting on this thread.
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    Lama Zopa's words.

    I was referring to the beginning of said quote:
    Therefore, it becomes very important to support His Holiness and to fulfill His Holiness’ wishes. For that reason, Kopan Monastery stopped doing this practice. This was done for His Holiness.
  • edited August 2010
    mugzy wrote: »
    I know for a fact that Lama Zopa Rinpoche is supporting the Dalai Lama in this matter and has ceased this practice.

    yes, this is true. Poor Lama Zopa must break wiht the tradition of his root guru Lama Yeshe in order to follow the restirictions set by DL.

    he also publically advises those who have a relationship wiht Dorje Shugden lamas such as geshe Kelsang to keep their relationship and keep following their advice. Shows how much he actually agrees with the ban, huh?
    ;)
    As I understand it, what the Dalai Lama said is that he will not give empowerments or initiations to those who continue to worship Shugden, but that people may choose to do so if that is their belief.

    this is incorrect and there is abundant photographic and video evidence to prove it. I will provide this upon request.
    How is that different from any other requirements or following other orders of a teacher? If a teacher says, "Don't do this practice if you wish to receive teachings from me," then you can continue to do so if you don't agree with it, but are choosing to move away from their teachings.

    It is different becasue he is functioning as a head of state with political powers and motivations. if he were actually stating his recommendations and letting people follow their wisdom, I think you would have a good point.
    The violence perpetrated towards Shugden practitioners by Dalai Lama supporters was not advocated by the TGIE as far as I know. Those who choose to be violent are acting in ways that is not supportive to the well-being or personal freedoms of others.

    Even if they haven't....and they have, but i have no time to prove it now, happy to discuss tomorrow....shouldn't the government speak out against violence perpetrated upon a subset of their people?

    why can't you find one instance of this? DL saying "don't hurt them." or the notices saying the ycannot come into this hospital should be removed," etc.

    it's an important point!

    no more time today, maybe see you tomorrow....
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    no more time today, maybe see you tomorrow....

    Hopefully not, if you're going to continue throwing around baseless accusations and personal attacks when people are trying to explore the topic and find the truth.

    For the record, I said that the issue was complex. Violence against anyone for their beliefs, including Shugden practitioners, is wrong.
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited August 2010
    crazycloud wrote: »
    I think you do not actually understand the meaning of ad hominem.
    this post attacks sectarian and shameful behavior. ad hominem attacks the person.
    Let's avoid a pissing contest about who knows what ad hominem means. The fact is, Shenpen made a historical assertion, and instead of calling its factuality into question by asking him to back it up or providing countervailing evidence, Caz claimed that he was motivated to make that assertion by sectarianism. I don't care what you call it, that's shoddy reasoning and shoddy rhetoric.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    edited August 2010
    mugzy wrote: »
    I was referring to the beginning of said quote:

    One should also remember Lama zopa's root guru Lama yeshe died a Dorje shugden practitoner.
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited August 2010
    caz namyaw wrote: »
    One should also remember Lama zopa's root guru Lama yeshe died a Dorje shugden practitoner.

    Yes. I was only pointing out that Lama Zopa is adhering to the Dalai Lama's instructions. Nothing more.

    In my opinion, this entire discussion is going in circles.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited August 2010
    Right, well, in that case, let's call it a day, shall we?

    As ever, if anyone has anything of significant note to add, which would improve and take the discussion forward, let me know.
    Otherwise, I bid you all good night.
    Cocoa in the kitchen......
This discussion has been closed.