Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
I've learned that gratitude is one way to help dissolve the self, since it is an acknowledgment that many of one's good traits are merely the product of fortunate causes and conditions.
So I was wondering if something similar works for one's BAD traits -- is it skillful to reflect upon the fact that our undesirable traits are simply the product of unfortunate causes and conditions? Do we go as far as to "blame" our parents, teachers, peers, school system, genes, etc., for causing us to be overweight/unsuccessful, etc?
If so, how could we do this without cultivating ill will, self-pity or passivity in one's life?
0
Comments
I used to review events and passages in my life and imagine myself doing the right things at the right time in order to have been the best parent (teacher, friend, mentor) I could have ever had.
I'm really not sure how to address your question... Maybe reflection on impermanence would be beneficial?
But maybe you could.
It really is what situations you've encountered, and how you've seen others, and yourself, handle such things. So I guess it's both, or maybe not.
Cultivate compassion because, hey, it could be you doing that. But you, fortunately, were not dealt the hand they were, and they're trying to be as happy as they can, whether doing wholesome or unwholsome things, and they can't be blamed for that. As well, for people who haven't found the path, they are even more deluded than you, you could say. So offer them help if they need it, but don't try and change them unless they want. They just want to live.
What we are, is a product of circumstance.
Who we are is a product of our own making.
Kamma is self-wrought.
"'I am the owner of my actions (kamma), heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and have my actions as my arbitrator. Whatever I do, for good or for evil, to that will I fall heir'...
"[This is a fact that] one should reflect on often, whether one is a woman or a man, lay or ordained..." You focus entirely on your choices, decisions and the consequences you have brought about through these.
Nobody else is responsible for who you are, but you.
So if you really feel blame is to be apportioned - take a look at 'the man in the mirror'.
Therein lies your culprit.
I don't think the OP was reflecting on such severe cases, and as such, neither was I.
My comments - in light of the OP's general tone in the first post - still stands as relevant and on-topic.
One cannot 'rise above it', without professional help.
I was offered professional help, but in the end, I was the primary orchestrator of my own personal healing process. But again, this is not, I believe, what was being referred to in the original query, and as such, I didn't even think about it.... Whilst others may well be to blame for the perpetration of such damaging treatment, each person ultimately must take responsibility for themselves and their own healing. The problem never goes away.
You merely cease to be attached to it.
as this thread outlines very succinctly.
http://newbuddhist.com/discussion/8588/i-didn-t.-it-s-still-there./#Item_5
When something is wrong, correct it.
Don't elevate or demean anything.
(Lojong 7 point mind training slogan. Explanation by Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche)
A lot of people seem to get through this world and actually make quite a comfortable life by being compassionate and open - even seemingly compassionate and open. Yet although we share the same world, we ourselves get hit constantly... For instance, we could be sharing a room with a college mate, eating the same problematic food, sharing the same shitty house, having the same schedule and the same teachers. Our roommate manages to handle everything OK and find his or her freedom. We, on the other hand, are stuck with that memory and filled with resentment all the time. We would like to be revolutionary, to blow up the world. We could say the schoolteacher did it, that everybody hates us and they did it. But WHY do they hate us? That is a very interesting point.
...
Everything is based on our own uptightness. We could blame the organization; we could blame the government; we could blame the food; we could blame the highways; we could blame out own motorcars, out own clothes; we could blame an infinite variety of things. But it is we who are not letting go, not developing enough warmth and sympathy - which makes us problematic. So we cannot blame anybody...This slogan applies whenever we complain about anything, even that our coffee is cold or our bathroom is dirty. It goes very far. Everything is due to our own uptightness, so to speak, which is known as ego holding, ego fixation. Since we are so uptight about ourselves, that makes us very vulnerable at the same time... We get hit, but nobody means to hit us - we are actually inviting the bullets.
...
The text says "drive all blames into one". the reason you have to do that is because you have been cherishing yourself so much... Although sometimes you might say that you don't like yourself, even then in your heart of hearts you know that you like yourself so much that you're willing to throw everybody else down the drain, down the gutter. You are really willing to do that. You are really willing to let somebody else sacrifice his life, give himself away for you. And who are you, anyway?
From Training the Mind & Cultivating Loving-Kindness by Chogyam Trungpa , copyright 1993 by Diana Mukpo.
(Official Chogyam Trungpa Website)
If we are the product of our choices, and our choices alone, then why should one be grateful to other people for the good things in our life? What stops successful people's egos from blowing up because they take all credit for the fortunate circumstances?
Also, when discussing "the man in the mirror" and the self as "object of loathing" we don't have to be talking about clinically depressed people. Normal people engage in negative self-concepts all the time: "Gosh I'm such a slob" or "Why am I always so hurting for money?" etc.
Of course, I'm not sure what builds the concept of self more, blaming other people or blaming yourself.
Do you think generous people should be shown gratitude?
Why? Are they Buddhist or not?
Please clarify.... Precisely.
I wasn't. This was more my point. I told you. It's not a question of apportioning blame, it's a question of taking responsibility.
Pema Chodron refers to "blame" as an "exit" from unwanted or uncomfortable situations. It is also a "barrier" that we fortify with our own concepts of right and wrong.
Blame is a "very common, ancient, well-perfected device for feeling better."
To address the title of this thread, I take it that in the proper practice of Buddhism as it is taught by the most skilled teachers, it is not possible to "skillfully blame."
I'm speaking from the point of view of a Buddhist practitioner.
I guess I'm just looking for some theoretical symmetry. I've heard that gratitude is a way to weaken self with regards to fortunate circumstances. So, if this is true, I'm wondering what is used to weaken self with regards to unfortunate circumstances? If we use gratitude as a tool, can we also use the reverse of gratitude as a tool?
Perhaps there is no symetry.
Or perhaps Iron Rabbit's point applies, that one should be grateful for both fortune and misfortune. Those comments stuck with me because I wasn't sure what to make of that.
What do you think?
Never blame others they arent a cause of any problems, If you examine carefully you will see the problem arises from the side of your mind and that it is a mere imputation upon the perceived, same again and you will see that these unfortunate situations are a result of negative karma, and with futher examination see that such karma is a result of unskillful actions causes by self cherishing and self grasping Ignorance. So If you want to be skillful in placing
blame make sure you place it right at the feet of the real problem which is this self cherishing/grasping we experience REAL happiness and an end to problems will only come by removing these two obstructions.
What you see as 'symmetry' is not. Blame is not a counter-weight to gratefulness. Blame relies on judging whereas gratefulness does not judge.
HHDL writes:"To nurture gratefulness in our hearts is to nurture a positive mind. And a positive mind is something that ultimately brings us benefit or happiness."
from "Foreword by His Holiness the Dalai Lama" to Deeper than Words by Brother David Steindl-Rast (2010. Image Books)
When you set me thinking about this notion of blame, I realised that I experience no blame when my mind is grateful. There may be some sadness and an awareness that my mind is still learning to rest in positive gratitude.
If, as I suspect, a blaming mind leads us away from the eightfold dance, our study and meditation practice, together with our positive actions are the tools which help us turn away from such fantasies.
Blame is something that we perceive. Life is far more positive if we look to be compassionate.
Of course, the behaviours of others often results in negative circumstances for ourselves. Blaming them never has positive results though. I experienced a particularly negative period in my life in which I found myself in a situation which I did not have the experience to cope with. I was not supported by my boss because he did not have the insight or management skills to do so.
For a while, I was angry and blamed him for my situation. However, by taking full responsibility for my own actions and understanding that the boss wasn't a bad guy (just a bad manager) I became much happier. Developing a skilful mind is key
Certainly not ! that is not skillful since our own happiness depends upon causes and conditions It is very unwise to create the causes for benifactors to cease theyre good deeds by being ungrateful.
Institutionalized racism preventing people from acquiring a university education, preventing them from living in a safe neighborhood, from getting a good job; the dominant society is not to blame for limitations imposed upon the marginalized? Who is (or was: speaking historically) responsible (i.e. "to blame") for extrajudicial lynchings? Nobody?
Someone said, "It's not a question of apportioning blame, it's a question of taking responsibility". How does that work in the lynching example?
However, having suffered a fair bit of abuse from parents and ex-spouse, and now finding much to my dismay that my children would like to continue in the way of their father, the answer is to let it go. My parents are gone, and I have no contact with my ex, but if I move toward enlightenment, I benefit and perhaps my children will too. I must let go of the blame if I want to move on. It seems to me that mindfulness is involved here. Mindfulness has no dealings with the past where blame lies. And I agree that wanting to cling to blaming is clinging to self, a self for which life will always be unsatisfactory.
thats why Buddha said, " regards him as treasure pointer, who blames you for your wrong actions..: