Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

The fifth precept.. Intoxicants?

I've only read people talking in reference to alcohol.. What is the buddha's theory of marijuana? Prescription drugs?
«1

Comments

  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited January 2011
    The precept is usually rendered as alcohol and intoxicating substances/drugs, or substances that cause "heedlessness". In other words, the other precepts may be broken while under the effect of such a substance; anything that destroys mindfulness, muddies the mind's eye and control of your thoughts, speech and actions is not conducive to the practice.

    Medicine is another story, if not being abused.

    Namaste
  • Well for one thing many drugs create an attachment beyond anything we can break with mental power alone, addiction. Buddha wouldn't like people using marijuana or alcohol, prescription drugs would probably be fine by him if they were necessary in treating an illness and weren't just taken for the power of their intoxication.

    intoxication is a short term and harmful way to keep yourself from attachments. when your drunk you aren't abstractly afraid of things and you don't crave abstract things that's really the pleasure of intoxication. just the pleasure of life minus some of the craving and fear.

    I imagine a drunk enlightened person would be just as happy as a sober enlightened person, just less balanced and clear in the head.

    So...
    intoxicants cause addiction, physical harm, reduced clarity, and in the end the most they can do is give you are the effects of buddhist practice, just more short term and less pure.
  • Well I don't like marijuana I was just wandering. Although I like the effects of prescription drugs.. I would say I "abuse" them and crave them but when I'm on a "high" I feel more clear headed and open minded and more alert. The craving is probably the bad thing but I feel like they're not ruining or destroying my mindset.
  • Let me make a distinction here. If you are in physical pain then a relief from that isn't a problem. It's when you use prescription drugs as a way to avoid the mental pain, of craving, that you are really doing a disservice to yourself.
  • I use prescription drugs to go to sleep, stay asleep, and relax. Prescription pain pills make me express my feelings easier and make me feel good and just open my mind. How is that bad? Other than the fact that it's a craving..
  • KundoKundo Sydney, Australia Veteran
    edited January 2011
    It's "bad" in the sense that what you are doing is taking in chemicals to produce feelings of euphoria, relaxation and lack of inhibitions - exactly what alcohol and other illicit drugs do. The only real difference here is that you can obtain them legally.

    Drugs are drugs are drugs, legal, natural or otherwise. Why do you think it's ok just because they're legal? People can overdose from prescription drugs (and quite frequently do) much more easily because they're easy to obtain.

    You are deluding yourself if you think doing prescription drugs is safer and more moral than doing illegal ones.

    In metta,
    Raven
    I use prescription drugs to go to sleep, stay asleep, and relax. Prescription pain pills make me express my feelings easier and make me feel good and just open my mind. How is that bad? Other than the fact that it's a craving..
  • it's a dependence on something unnecessary,you could get all that and much more without the drugs, just buddhism it up.
  • edited January 2011
    It is not advisable to drink alcohol as it causes damage to the body. However, alcohol is ok to quench for comfort in winter, and as a form of medicine to strengthen the energy flow of a weak body especially the age, and probably after giving birth as herbal effect, and cooking for taste. It should be consumed with the understanding of addiction especially when taken initially to warm the body during winter. Normally, practitioners are living on moderate mental and physical well beings through healthy foods and meditation, so it usually does not require additional supplement such as intoxicants. There are exception as mentioned above as not everyone is blessed with a strong and healthy body. It should not be addicted over it. Baby never born to be addicted with intoxicants so it is still best to avoid them Having mentioned this, meditation is a good form of intoxicants :vimp: Buddha Sakyamuni did not take intoxicants.
  • edited January 2011
    My POV? Alcohol, narcotics, pot is a mind numbing thing, isn't it? Except in lesser arenas of popular culture, no great art or literature or music has been created under it's influence. I'd be glad to be wrong.

    OTOH, At 180 degrees the other direction there's stuff like LSD. I'd love to take a supervised trip with pharmaceutical grade LSD. I don't think that would be looked down upon Buddha-wise because it would not be a habit and it is demonstrably creative and educational.

    Thanks for letting me add my two cents. It feels good to openly wish for and justify a legal, supervised LSD trip! :rockon: Too bad it's not possible. :angry:
  • What is the buddha's theory of prescription drugs? without meaning to sound like an ass but think about it.
    The answer to all of these questions that I see crop up every day on this forum is, you will know if what you are doing is clouding your practice, if indeed you have one yet. Only 'you' have the answer to this question....Buddha made the map....but I think he meant for you to find your own way
  • edited January 2011
    this is starting to piss me off too, I'm a big drinker and herb smoker..have been for 15 years and im only 25.. lol..its not funny tho.

    guys have you ever heard that "THOU ART BUDDHA" something like that? ask yourself this question that you pose... and answer honestly its that simple..kinda like chanratt says..

    I have a few problems with smoking and drinking.. more than a few problems ..its something thats holding me back extremely.. F*** herbs and booze, seriously..

    they are useless unless you want to live in a fantasy world and die sooner than you want to.. which in my case is happening.. im so far gone ..last month..my doctor says i have a 10% chance to recover my liver if i never drink again..you know what ive been doing tonight ? polishing off 24 beers..

    in all honesty these things are childish .. instead ..work out a bit, im starting to, and its a greater high and much more beneficial, and im not talkin health, i got lucky a few times recently because of it...not to mention an increase in stamina which goes towards work, and play.. anyway
    f*** off
  • Some people say it always refer to alcohol because alcoholism is an issue in Indian society. That nothing has been said about marijuana must be due to the fact that it was not an issue in the society during Buddha's time. But personally, I would like to think that the fifth precepts has to do with intoxicatns which probably include surfing the net too. It is damn intoxicating!
  • In my opinion, as long as you are able to maintain mindfulness under the drugs influence it is not a problem. People here seem to be extremely anti drug, but it is possible that even the Buddha's ephiany was a result of a natural drug trip. The body naturally produces DMT for example and after 40 days without food it is not unrealistic for the pineal gland to produce it.

    It is just a theory, but you can research it on the Internet... All I'm saying is you have to decide what breaks the fifth precept for yourself.
  • edited January 2011
    The fifth precept is quite clear. In both Theravada and Mahayana traditions it states:

    "I undertake the precept to refrain from intoxicating drinks and drugs which lead to carelessness."

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sila/pancasila.html
    .
  • shanyinshanyin Novice Yogin Sault Ontario Veteran
    "just buddhism it up."

    lol

    I like this but I can't articulate why. :P
  • shanyinshanyin Novice Yogin Sault Ontario Veteran
    I'm pretty sure the Buddha had a list of unfortunate things that happen when someone becomes addicted to substances. If I can find it on the internet I'll post, I'll take a quick look.

    There are smart people who are anti-drug and smart people who think pychedelics are miracles in pill form. Of course addiction and abuse are likely discouraged by both sides.

    Meditation is the perfect drug.

    "Just buddhism it up". <------
  • I see the 5th precept as a training to also be mindful of non chemical drugs, such as certain media, which one can also lose themselves in. Thich Nhat Hanh sums it up nicely in the "5th mindfulness training" (precept) on the Plum Village site:

    "Aware of the suffering caused by unmindful consumption, I am committed to cultivating good health, both physical and mental, for myself, my family, and my society by practicing mindful eating, drinking, and consuming. I will practice looking deeply into how I consume the Four Kinds of Nutriments, namely edible foods, sense impressions, volition, and consciousness. I am determined not to gamble, or to use alcohol, drugs, or any other products which contain toxins, such as certain websites, electronic games, TV programs, films, magazines, books, and conversations. I will practice coming back to the present moment to be in touch with the refreshing, healing and nourishing elements in me and around me, not letting regrets and sorrow drag me back into the past nor letting anxieties, fear, or craving pull me out of the present moment. I am determined not to try to cover up loneliness, anxiety, or other suffering by losing myself in consumption. I will contemplate interbeing and consume in a way that preserves peace, joy, and well-being in my body and consciousness, and in the collective body and consciousness of my family, my society and the Earth."

    http://www.plumvillage.org/mindfulness-trainings/3-the-five-mindfulness-trainings.html

  • In my opinion, as long as you are able to maintain mindfulness under the drugs influence it is not a problem. People here seem to be extremely anti drug, but it is possible that even the Buddha's ephiany was a result of a natural drug trip. The body naturally produces DMT for example and after 40 days without food it is not unrealistic for the pineal gland to produce it.

    It is just a theory, but you can research it on the Internet... All I'm saying is you have to decide what breaks the fifth precept for yourself.
    I am not "anti-drug", but rather "pro-mindfulness". This makes it possible to not get lost in language that doesn't really represent reality, because what we consider "mind altering" can come in many different forms, chemical and non-chemical. In other words, in reality there are those that drink every once in awhile very lightly and those that spend almost every waking moment playing World of Warcraft.

    Perhaps many here do not use chemical intoxicants because it interferes with their practice, especially those that have been practicing a long time. In many cases, it isn't "anti" anything, but rather personal choice. You can use all the drugs you want and find for yourself if it is conducive to minimizing delusion and suffering.

    Best wishes!

  • I take the 5th precept to be ANY intoxicant used for recreational reasons. I don't think the precept would be violated if you are taking the drug for a true medical reason and use them as directed by a doctor.
    ex-
    If you are proscribed, say, Vicodin for pain and use it as your doctor said you should, this is not a violation of the 5th precept. On the other hand, if you start taking them more than was proscribed because you like the high, that is a clear violation of the 5th precept.

    Any sort of intoxicant/drug may seem to give you wisdom/second sight/whatever, but it is a illusion. Drugs will take you over eventally and cause more suffering in many many ways with Addiction being the biggest source of suffering.

    Mindfullness needs a clear mind that has no limits put on it by intoxicants.(At least, that is my experience...I have a heck of time staying mindfull sober!)
  • edited January 2011
    The fifth precept is quite clear. In both Theravada and Mahayana traditions it states:

    "I undertake the precept to refrain from intoxicating drinks and drugs which lead to carelessness."

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sila/pancasila.html
    .

    Gotta go with that: TOTALLY.

    Thanks for posting it. :thumbsup:

    Yeah, it's no "fun" if you are younger BUT for me as a guy approaching middle age: it makes perfect sense.

    I guess it's okay to "grow up and into Buddhism" there's no strict time schedule. Getting older has benefits I guess.

    OTOH, If smoking and drinking again could give me back my 20s I'd be gone in a half hour. :D:D:D
  • I smoke marijuana to help me write and brainstorm ideas for essays and stories. I do notice that it slows down my grasping process, when talking to someone I'll completely zone out. It's good to know it's pros and cons and responsible usage for the drug. I never smoke when I have work to be done, school, social gatherings (though I also use it socially with friends) and any activity that needs mind my to be sharp.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited January 2011
    Its some peoples karma to do drugs. Do the best you can. Maybe its time to get off drugs. That time might come. It is possible to form 'relatively' healthy relationships to drugs. Some are easy like coffee and tea. Some are almost impossible.

    The 5th precept isn't about purity. It is about not becoming heedless so you make a condition in which your life has less spiritual meaning. Such as you harm someone and get involved in negative things.

    The 5th precept is nothing like the hare krishna prohibition to meat where they think meat makes you impure. Drugs are neither pure or impure. It is some peoples karma to do them. Try to be as compassionate and awake as you can. A crusade against or for drugs is meaningless. Mindfulness is meaningful and allows you to make a true non-habitual choice.

    That being said drugs are an example sometimes of something people grasp. To condition their experience. To fix it. But that doesn't mean that people who do not to drugs overcome this. No they have their computers and shopping and nail biting, and sex, and music, spouses, meditation highs, pride in scholarship, careers and collections etc..

    Within all of these behaviours even something as sacred cow as a baby there is grasping and also a spiritual pleasure of life. Drugs can also be enjoyed but they are dangerous and interfere with life. Its like trainspotting movie about herion. Choose life or choose drugs.

  • That being said drugs are an example sometimes of something people grasp. To condition their experience. To fix it. But that doesn't mean that people who do not to drugs overcome this. No they have their computers and shopping and nail biting, and sex, and music, spouses, meditation highs, pride in scholarship, careers and collections etc..
    Good point. All those things cause distraction and carelessness. Like literal intoxicants. :)

  • edited January 2011


    http://www.plumvillage.org/mindfulness-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Your post was a nice reality check, D. Thanks :)

    I went to the link and it got scary, says the website has been "hacked."

    I edited the link I copied above with x to be safe.

  • KundoKundo Sydney, Australia Veteran
    edited January 2011
    Yep no two ways about it.

    It's pretty clear that toking it up, shooting it up or pissing the night away are against the Fifth precept. I would suggest it's not so much

    "In my opinion, as long as you are able to maintain mindfulness under the drugs influence it is not a problem" (quoting Minty)

    but more like if you can't accept the precept, then face the fact that Buddhism may not be for you.

    I'm sorry I don't mean to hijack this thread and rant but if one can't follow important tenets of a path, the maybe they should find another path. If one really wants to follow a path, bluntly, harden up and do it. No spiritual journey is meant to be easy. Buddhism is no exception.

    Respectfully,
    Raven
    The fifth precept is quite clear. In both Theravada and Mahayana traditions it states:

    "I undertake the precept to refrain from intoxicating drinks and drugs which lead to carelessness."

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sila/pancasila.html
    .
  • edited January 2011
    Yep no two ways about it.

    It's pretty clear that toking it up, shooting it up or pissing the night away are against the Fifth precept. I would suggest it's not so much

    "In my opinion, as long as you are able to maintain mindfulness under the drugs influence it is not a problem" (quoting Minty)

    but more like if you can't accept the precept, then face the fact that Buddhism may not be for you.

    I'm sorry I don't mean to hijack this thread and rant but if one can't follow important tenets of a path, the maybe they should find another path. If one really wants to follow a path, bluntly, harden up and do it. No spiritual journey is meant to be easy. Buddhism is no exception.

    Respectfully,
    Raven

    OTOH, it takes a while to figure out how to approach such a powerful and difficult path. As long as the people getting intoxicated haven't actually taken refuge then they are certainly allowed to experiment and adjust, right?

    We don't want to scare anybody away from a chance to eventually realize their own Buddha nature.

    :-/
  • Dhammachick,

    If you accept rebirth then in countless lifetimes you were addicted to drugs. Don't sever anyone's connection to the dharma!
  • Not all drugs are addictive, and let's not forget drugs is an umbrella term for all kinds of stuff.

    The point of the precept is to not be unskillful. If the drugs don't make you unskillful then it doesn't matter. Besides, heedlessness is subjective. Paracetamol sure numbs the body quite a bit and can make you drowsy and thus numb your mind too......make of that what you will.
  • KundoKundo Sydney, Australia Veteran
    Well that would only be logical. My main gripe is with people claiming a path but then going "I'm a[insert path of choice] except I don't believe in xyz" It's like being a Christian but not thinking you need to follow the Ten Commandments.
    OTOH, it takes a while to figure out how to approach such a powerful and difficult path. As long as the people getting intoxicated haven't actually taken refuge then they are certainly allowed to experiment and adjust, right?

    We don't want to scare anybody away from a chance to eventually realize their own Buddha nature.

    :-/
  • KundoKundo Sydney, Australia Veteran
    edited January 2011
    I'm not severing anyone's connection to Dharma. I'm asking why people want to follow a path but not follow it. It's not easy to follow the Dharma. But if we accept that Buddha was enlightened and that his teachings on the Middle Way are correct, then that means accepting the Precepts for consideration and application.

    If I'm wrong about that then maybe Buddhism isn't for ME either. *shrugs*
    Dhammachick,

    If you accept rebirth then in countless lifetimes you were addicted to drugs. Don't sever anyone's connection to the dharma!
  • dhammachick, there are a few differences between buddhism and christianity. buddhism doesn't require you do anything, it doesn't claim you will be tortured for something or tell you you are disobeying an omnipotent being. you can pick and choose what you want, Buddha just tells us what he sees as best.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited January 2011
    Doing drugs or even breaking vows is only negative karma. We do not become enlightened by creating positive karma however. That leads to a god realm. Buddha only gave the precepts to create conditions in which dharma practice is possible. Dharma practice leads to insight into the nature of reality that liberates people from grasping.

    If the drug use creates such severe problems that this is impossible (stability for insight) the best thing to do is to create a wish that at a later time you will have overcome the addiction and can practice the dharma.

    Saying "oh I am not a buddhist I will crawl under a rock or give up" is foolish. I know you think you are giving tough love I guess. I know you think you are doing the right thing.

    Trying to make someone give up drugs by leveraging 'you are not a good enough buddhist' is like opening a chrysalis and killing the butterfly. At the right moment the condition for sobriety or what is necessary to practice enlightenment will come about. This is aided by are wishing prayers that it will happen even though we are trapped in unskillful behaviour.

    Many may not have even recognized their addiction is an impediment. So why would you dislodge them from an awareness practice in which they may become aware of that reality?
  • edited January 2011
    Of course it isn't easy. Addiction and substance abuse isn't easy, either. I've seen people destroy themselves with it, and have had my own troubles with it as well. These important tenets are obviously intended to help people live happier and healthier lives. You can't maintain mindfulness when you're wasted. Some people may have difficulty maintaining some of the tenets or even understanding some teachings, but they probably could use more help in overcoming their difficulty than condemnation.

    There's this story I heard about someone asking Shuryu Suzuki about Zen. Seeing a pack of cigarettes in his pocket, he said something along the lines of it being at least as hard as quitting smoking.
  • If you say 'I am a buddhist because I keep the precepts, meditate, and study... That is wrong view because it is caught up in the idea of a self. Prideful. Ego.
  • KundoKundo Sydney, Australia Veteran
    You're missing my point - deliberately or not I don't know. I can't express my views adequately so I will bow out of the conversation.

    But those of you who've questioned my post have given me food for thought.

    In metta,
    Raven
    If you say 'I am a buddhist because I keep the precepts, meditate, and study... That is wrong view because it is caught up in the idea of a self. Prideful. Ego.
  • neuroleptics break this precept... and alcohol is also an anestesic, and general calmer of the mind if taken in small quantities (and is much less inefficient than meditation). precepts, apply at your own discretion... that's why it is not called "rules" or "commandments".
  • edited January 2011


    If you accept rebirth then in countless lifetimes you were addicted to drugs.
    With respect, Jeffrey, speculation about the possibility of negativity in 'countless lifetimes' isn't necessarily helpful or relevant to the here and now. I can see how it might be a tool used to try to make people have more empathy with others - but not everyone accepts that explanation and we shouldn't speculate about others anyway.

    Buddha said :

    "There are these four unconjecturables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them. Which four?

    "The Buddha-range of the Buddhas is an unconjecturable that is not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about it.

    "The jhana-range of a person in jhana...

    " The [precise working out of the] results of kamma...

    "Conjecture about [the origin, etc., of] the world is an unconjecturable that is not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about it.

    "These are the four unconjecturables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them."


    (AN 4.77)

    http://www.what-buddha-taught.net/accesstoinsight/html/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.077.than.html


    with kind wishes

    D.




  • Once you find the ultimate truth of reality the precepts might as well go right out the window anyway.

    I don't mean that they shouldn't be used as a general guide for being a good person and such, but I mean once enlightened you can see just how fake reality actually is. You can go out and slaughter puppies And shoot people in cold blood... It doesn't matter. The point is that once you have truth, you probably wouldn't want to because you'd only be hurting yourself anyway.

    Killing hurts the killer, not the killed.

    If one chooses to use drugs, it is right for them. Waking life is just a dream, don't take it so seriously... If you want to smoke some pot and relax, go ahead. If you don't, then simply do not. You can do whatever you want and there is no such thing as a "bad Buddhist."
  • edited January 2011
    Once you find the ultimate truth of reality the precepts might as well go right out the window anyway.

    I don't mean that they shouldn't be used as a general guide for being a good person and such, but I mean once enlightened you can see just how fake reality actually is. You can go out and slaughter puppies And shoot people in cold blood... It doesn't matter. The point is that once you have truth, you probably wouldn't want to because you'd only be hurting yourself anyway.

    Killing hurts the killer, not the killed.

    If one chooses to use drugs, it is right for them. Waking life is just a dream, don't take it so seriously... If you want to smoke some pot and relax, go ahead. If you don't, then simply do not. You can do whatever you want and there is no such thing as a "bad Buddhist."
    Hi Mintyfresh0

    Unless I've misunderstood, you appear to think that you have some advanced understanding yourself and that morality in Dhamma practice is unnecessary at some point.

    I suggest you find an offline teacher at a Buddhist centre and do some face-to -face talking to them and to some other practitioners there, because you seem to have some very muddled ideas that you're giving out as advice to others.

    Kind regards,

    D.
  • Once you find the ultimate truth of reality the precepts might as well go right out the window anyway.

    I don't mean that they shouldn't be used as a general guide for being a good person and such, but I mean once enlightened you can see just how fake reality actually is. You can go out and slaughter puppies And shoot people in cold blood... It doesn't matter. The point is that once you have truth, you probably wouldn't want to because you'd only be hurting yourself anyway.

    Killing hurts the killer, not the killed.

    If one chooses to use drugs, it is right for them. Waking life is just a dream, don't take it so seriously... If you want to smoke some pot and relax, go ahead. If you don't, then simply do not. You can do whatever you want and there is no such thing as a "bad Buddhist."
    Hi Mintyfresh0

    Unless I've misunderstood, you appear to think that you have some advanced understanding yourself and that morality in Dhamma practice is unnecessary at some point.

    I suggest you find an offline teacher at a Buddhist centre and do some face-to -face talking to them and to some other practitioners there, because you seem to have some very muddled ideas that you're giving out as advice to others.

    Kind regards,

    D.
    On the contrary, advising others to not take life too seriously and do what pleases them is the best advice.

    I believe even the dahlia Llama said something to the effect that life should not be taken so seriously.

    The only advice I'm offering is to look inside to see what is right for you and not adhere to any specific set of laws other than ones own.

    Think for yourself.
  • edited January 2011
    Hi Mintyfresh0,

    You advised me "Think for yourself."

    Nah, why do that when I can consult "the dahlia Llama"? LOL !

    http://www.buddhismwithoutboundaries.com/dazz/Dalia.jpg

    http://www.buddhismwithoutboundaries.com/dazz/LLAMA.jpg


    Be well and at ease,

    D.




  • CinorjerCinorjer Veteran
    edited January 2011
    Once you find the ultimate truth of reality the precepts might as well go right out the window anyway.

    I don't mean that they shouldn't be used as a general guide for being a good person and such, but I mean once enlightened you can see just how fake reality actually is. You can go out and slaughter puppies And shoot people in cold blood... It doesn't matter. The point is that once you have truth, you probably wouldn't want to because you'd only be hurting yourself anyway.

    Killing hurts the killer, not the killed.

    If one chooses to use drugs, it is right for them. Waking life is just a dream, don't take it so seriously... If you want to smoke some pot and relax, go ahead. If you don't, then simply do not. You can do whatever you want and there is no such thing as a "bad Buddhist."
    Hi Mintyfresh0

    Unless I've misunderstood, you appear to think that you have some advanced understanding yourself and that morality in Dhamma practice is unnecessary at some point.

    I suggest you find an offline teacher at a Buddhist centre and do some face-to -face talking to them and to some other practitioners there, because you seem to have some very muddled ideas that you're giving out as advice to others.

    Kind regards,

    D.
    On the contrary, advising others to not take life too seriously and do what pleases them is the best advice.

    I believe even the dahlia Llama said something to the effect that life should not be taken so seriously.

    The only advice I'm offering is to look inside to see what is right for you and not adhere to any specific set of laws other than ones own.

    Think for yourself.
    If you truly believe this, then I'm sorry for the suffering coming your way.

    Life is not a dream, reality is not fake, actions have consequences, killing very much hurts the killed, and it's certainly not "Anything goes."

    Your thinking is a cautionary example of what happens when someone confuses Buddhism for Nihilism. Once the party is over and you look around at the mess you've made of your life and wonder what to do now, take another look at the Noble Truths and see if you can figure out why your path turned out to be a dead end. The Dharma will be waiting patiently.
  • Dazzle, I had a recollection from dhammachicks posts, though I could be in error, that she did believe in rebirth. Which is why I mentioned rebirth. Not to have 'another' thread.
  • edited January 2011
    Dazzle, I had a recollection from dhammachicks posts, though I could be in error, that she did believe in rebirth. Which is why I mentioned rebirth. Not to have 'another' thread.
    Just because someone believes in rebirth doesn't mean you should speculate about what kind of rebirths they had - such as suggesting they were addicted to drugs in countless lifetimes,though, Jeffrey !

    Anyway, may you be well and at peace.

    D :)
  • edited January 2011
    Well that would only be logical. My main gripe is with people claiming a path but then going "I'm a[insert path of choice] except I don't believe in xyz" It's like being a Christian but not thinking you need to follow the Ten Commandments.

    I'm not severing anyone's connection to Dharma. I'm asking why people want to follow a path but not follow it. It's not easy to follow the Dharma. But if we accept that Buddha was enlightened and that his teachings on the Middle Way are correct, then that means accepting the Precepts for consideration and application.

    If I'm wrong about that then maybe Buddhism isn't for ME either. *shrugs*


    No big deal. Everything will be okay. :) Buddha himself said it is okay to question the heck out of everything he said.

    I do see what you mean though, for sure. Where does one draw the line?

    I personally? I'd draw the line and get really "demanding" (bad choice of words? not that you're demanding anything) about following the precepts after someone claiming to follow the path actually ______TAKES REFUGE_______.

    Oh the christian thing? My two cents (probably wrong). AFAIK, you can kill, rape and plunder and still get to Heaven by some such procedure. In B. you can't get away from bad Karma (even if you have NOT taken refuge!) so it's muuuuch better for "enforcing" personal responsibility. :D



  • This topic has been discussed many times, and it's always the same. Use the search feature and you'll see what I mean.
  • Oh dazzle this is the way my lama teaches. Samsara is taught as having had no beginning.
  • edited January 2011
    Oh dazzle this is the way my lama teaches. Samsara is taught as having had no beginning.
    I very much doubt that Lama Shenpen tells people in her e-mail teachings that "in countless lifetimes you were addicted to drugs." because I've read some of her interactions with people in her online courses, Jeffrey.

    .
  • She does say to have compassion for all variety of people to consider in countless lifetimes that you were in their shoes. I guarantee you. My tone was probably different from lama shenpen's. Of course I am not an incarnation of Lama Shenpen.
  • edited January 2011
    She does say to have compassion for all variety of people to consider in countless lifetimes that you were in their shoes. I guarantee you.
    I'm sure she meant for you to contemplate that yourself - and not that you should presume to try to teach it to other people (and get it wrong)

Sign In or Register to comment.