Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Top monk plays violent video games
Comments
Games can also be highly addictive, and hence a serious challenge to non-attachment."
So I take it if you had children you would not let them watch bugs bunny and power rangers. Ok. Interesting interpretation of the dharma. Good luck. Or play paddy cake. Or monopoly.
Secondly and more seriously -- yes i do have kids (3 years & 1 month old), and yes i most certainly am aware of a) the amount of 'screen time' the older one has (this includes TV, computer, phones etc) and, and b) the content of that screen time - for example, I would never let him watch a show that was inappropriately violent. Does this mean he never sees someone having a fight or getting hit on TV? No, of course not. As you allude, cartoons are full of that stuff. But this in a cartoon the 'world' is plastic, flexible, etc, and ultimately no-one is really hurt. Most kids shows actually have no violence whatsoever - because they know it's not good for kids to watch!
Compare this to a video game where the player is required, as part of that game, to repeatedly commit violent acts (shooting, killing people) that are shown in a realistic way. Big, big, difference.
@Jeffrey - me neither. they are probably the most violent of all. i saw a clip for one where you actually had to mow down a bunch of innocent people at an airport with a machine gun (apparently because you were pretending to be a terrorist or something). anyway just watching a short clip of it made me feel terrible. i can't imagine actually playing it and the effect it would have on you. the scary part is, i'm sure many people who play these games are not aware of the effect these experiences can have on us. as for LOTR/HP - my 3yo can't read yet but no i wouldn't let him watch them at his age - waaay to scary. later on, sure.
The games I play glorify 'power' more than violence. You try to make your character powerful by the 'build' which is composed of a series of choices in design elements. For example you can choose between a fireball that splits in two or one that explodes.
Most of the fun for me is seeing how my plan which was quite creative and fun to develope pans out in practice. I also enjoy the graphics and music and 'arcade' aspects.
I don't think I enjoy the violence but it is a showcase for those other elements. I also have enjoyed sims type games (years ago) where you plan a city and that didn't involve violence other than natural disasters.
I don't think there is clear 'rule' on this topic. Like everything, it comes down to personal interpretation and people will always have views on what is and isn't acceptable.
My main point on violence in general, and violent games in particular, is that, as Buddhists, we should at least try to be aware of the effect on our minds of spending hours and hours in a violent environment, even if it is only a simulated one.
I guess I can see people criticizing the karmapa but we don't know all the facts and I think some people are forgetting that the karmapa has studied buddhism since age 3 with the best teachers in his tradition. So he has probably thought about these things himself. And in my opinion people have an expectation for the karmapa that is sort of based on an idealized vision rather than experience based dharma practice. And finally many are failing to realize that there are differences between Tibetan Buddhism and Therevada Buddhism. I react to these threads because I have love and respect for the Karmapa and it is upsetting to hear him I think misunderstood. Its not so much that people disagree with him playing video games but I think that they have this sort of vibe like 'oh those tibetan hooligans'. Its kind of disrespectuful or at least thats how I perceive it.
Part of it has to do with a high lama on a pedestal. And part with the devotional practice of Tibetan Buddhism which I feel a lot of westerners don't understand. The karmapa represents the lineage of awakened beings.
An example from the Tibetan tradition:
The Benefits of Prostrations
Summary: Lama Shenpen gives a very full response to a question about the benefits and spiritual effects of prostrations.
A student writes:
I would like some more indications of the benefits of prostration practice. I have not understood what spiritual effects are likely to unfold particularly, so, any hints in this respect will be gratefully received.
I just note in me so far a dedication and intention to do prostrations to assist me with the ego and an interest to actually learn more their significance, if that makes sense.
Lama Shenpen replies:
Yes it does. I think the full and whole hearted involvement of ones body, speech and mind/heart in the prostration is highly significant.
Somehow doing things physically and verbally helps the mind relax into the movement of the heart in the direction of opening up to our deepest source of inspiration. This source of inspiration and adhistana is both in us and in the Universe, which is reaching out to us in the form of the lineage of Awakened Beings.
So physically and verbally opening allows the heart to open naturally. Mentally we need to be focused on the meaning of what we are prostrating or opening our hearts to in this way. If a visual image is the most effective way of focusing in this way then visualise the Buddhas, the teachers of the lineage, the Dharma and the Sangha in whatever way inspires you. Otherwise simply remember what is inspiring about them - and even better verbalise those qualities and why you are prostrating to them.
One way to verbalise it is to say 'I take Refuge in the Buddha, the Awakened Ones who reveal the eternal fearless path,' I take Refuge in the Dharma, the goal of Nirvana and the path that leads to it. I take Refuge in the Sangha, those who have verified this Dharma for themselves and all their followers who show the way.' You can make up words like that or use different forms of the Refuge prayer such as the ones you used in the actual Refuge ceremony.
Remember the instruction that as you touch you hands to your head, throat and heart and bow putting your head on the floor you think in this way you confess and lay down all your negative tendencies in regard to your bodily actions, speech and thoughts, praying that all this karma fall away and that as you rise all the wonderful qualities of the Buddha’s body, speech and mind are awakened in you. As you do this try to do it with as much conviction as you can muster that this is actually happening. Somehow all times and places interpenetrate and you are instantly there at the end of the path, even as you set out at the beginning.
Think of your father on your right and your mother on your left and that they are prostrating with you - with all beings all around you, the beings of the six realms; you are doing it for all of them.
This makes an auspicious connection for them all. Really let your awareness open out into space and into the deepest insight into emptiness that you can muster, feeling happy and glad because of the connection and the adhistana* of the practice.
All the elements of Living the Awakened Heart are included in this practice and so all the benefits of all those elements. You are making very powerful pranidhanas* and generating immense punya*, and dedicating it for all beings - which is love and compassion for all beings; devotion and compassion together in one movement.......and renunciation of ego tendencies of course.
Well that is just some of the benefits!
Glossary:
Adhistana: Sustaining power, grace, blessing.
Pranidhana: A prayer that is like a blessing or curse, in the sense that somebody powerful utters their word of truth and this wish has the power of fulfilment.
Punya: Positive energy that by dedication to the benefit and Enlightenment of others is the source and means of the energy to realise Buddhahood
You are projecting your own experience of things onto a being that might have a higher and deeper intuitive interpretation of situations that effect you in an adverse way.
"in the universal womb that is boundless space
all forms of matter and energy occur
as flux of the four elements,
but all are empty forms, absent in reality:
all phenomena, arising in pure mind, are like that.
just as dream is a part of sleep,
unreal in its arising,
so all and everything is pure mind,
never separated from it,
and without substance or attribute.
experience is neither mind nor anything but mind;
it is a vivid display of emptiness, like magical illusion,
in the very moment inconceivable and unutterable.
all experience arising in the mind,
at its inception, know it as emptiness!"
— Longchenpa - Dzogchen Master from the early 1300's
Vajrayana is more radical a view than Theravada. If one is attached to the Theradin view of Buddhism, then one is of course not going to be able to understand the methods of Vajrayana.
Karmapa is a very deeply realized human being, far beyond the capacity of normal civilization. It's not the action itself that can create residual negativity, but ones internal interpretation of the act.
"Since everything is but an apparition, having nothing to do with good or bad, acceptance or rejection, one may well burst out in laughter." - Longchenpa
For a highly realized being, everything is skillful means, including sex and violence, as internally... there is no such abiding sex and violence. I'm sure that once the Karmapa feels that playing a game is unnecessary as a skillful means, it will be dropped like autumn leaves from a tree in the fall drop naturally off the branches. Letting go and letting be is very easy for beings of the Karmapas stature.
I have a pretty good direct understanding of the Karmapas inner state of being, through direct experience of his presence. He is not a normal human being, thus his interpretation of any action is not going to be "normal." What is conducive for your process while on Earth is not going to be the same as his. As they say, don't do as the teacher does, but more of what the teacher says, as the teacher is on an entirely different level than the student, the teacher having mastered the teaching and mastered the state of being a student.
The Effects of Violent Video Games
on Aggression
A Meta-Analysis
JOHN L. SHERRY
Purdue University
Human Communication Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, July 2001 409–431
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00787.x/abstract
Thanks for the post.
@Vajraheart - sorry, not interested in a Thera/Vajra debate.
That is equivalent to criticizing the Pope because he believes in God. You can do it but there is no basis for the pope to have a discussion with you other than a christianity versus buddhism motif.
Analogous to that you may not criticize the Karmapa by Therevadan standards without INVITING a Thera/Vajra debate. Action reaction.
We've gotta team up online sometimes! That'll be fun!!
I also play sacred 2 which has closed servers but more expensive and the community is kind of dying.
I suppose if there was any clear-cut conclusion then this topic wouldn't be resurfacing over and over again. It comes down to personal experience and no amount of debating/arguing/convincing can override personal experience. That's why I don't think that anyone participating in this topic would be swayed by any argument presented.
The best thing about PC is mods. Titanquest has some mods that are a very big enhancement the one I play is the quality of an expansion with no new areas but redesign of skills based on a gamers 4 years of playtesting. So it is very polished.
This is awesome to have a brother who works for Apple, I guess you get deals... no?
That's why video games are made, to provide something stimulating to do in your free time that you're involved with, that is fantasy. They're interactive movies, they're meant to challenge, enthrall, and entertain you.
So people play for the same reason people watch movies, it really isn't complicated at all. But you won't be able to identify with it unless you actually take some time to play the newer games. The newer, current games are night and day compared to the old ones when it comes to quality entertainment. The gaming industry does keep improving every year.
Many parents want their kids to play sports because it will, supposedly, help them develop skills and character. Although parents may not phrase it this way, sports can be a wholesome activity.
I emphasize can be because sports can also be un-wholesome. There is the desire to win at the opponents' expense, there is fear of losing, their is ill will towards opponents and players that are envied, their is pride, shame and other self-ing elements. There is even a temptation to cheat or be unethical.
But in the face of all this "temptation", so to speak, kids also have a tremendous opportunity to learn to strive with little attachment, to cultivate equanimity, to be magnanimous in victory and accepting of defeat, to have compassion for both their teammates and their opponents, to be grateful to their teammates and coaches, to be selfless and to be honest.
Thus, opportunity ("temptation") to be un-skillful creates opportunity to be skillful in a bigger way than if such temptation were not there.
Should parents always strive to shield kids from such temptations? Or should they put them into such situations so they can learn? And if children should do this, why not adults, too?
Whether the degree of explicit violence in many video games is enough to overcome any up sides is a serious question.
My take on it is that video game violence is probably not "worse" than the aggressiveness of other sports. Many sports have war-like themes to begin with (American football is an extreme), hence terms like offense, defense and territory, being used.
Although video games may involve depictions of violence, from an emotional standpoint I wonder if there is more "violence" being done when there is taunting, jostling, intimidation or rough play in face-to-face sports.
In relation to simple monks, I think you may have a point since monks are supposed to live a simple life with little temptation, and to have intensive training.
But for lay people, I think many activities that don't seem to be part of the path (such as games) can be ways to train themselves to act more skillfully in more "serious" situations that a layperson might find themselves in.
See my argument at the top of this post (kids and sports).
I've kicked around the world and met quite a few advanced monks with various positions of authority, and every one I've met was just a regular person. We tend to put them on pedestals and then spend our lives wishing we could be pure enough to be enlightened like those special monks, ignoring all the time that they're trying to tell us that's the wrong way of looking at it.
I was around before video games. Shoot, I was around before color television. Funny how people are no more or less violent now than back then. So what did we do back then? We played cowboy and indians and war and watched movies where people got shot and beat each other up and imagined we were there shooting the bad guys or robbing banks and getting away with it. In other words, we had fun playing make believe. And if someone fell down and really got hurt, we immediately stopped and made sure our buddy was all right, because we knew the difference between play acting and reality is that reality hurts.
I've played violent videos games since I was 5. I've watched bloody, violent movies since I was very young. I've been around swearing, smoking, and drinking my entire life.
Due to my own desire to be better than what I see, I eventually became a Buddhist. I have no desire to smoke, or drink. I rarely play video games any more. I do not want to be like the people I've seen on TV.
I see nothing wrong with the content of these things, unless a child is very stupid and/or susceptible to "peer pressure" or enjoys acting out things they see.
I do not believe that WHAT is on TV or in games is the problem, you see. I believe the problem is dependence and addiction to TV and games. Most every kid in America is only worried about what new movie or game is coming out next month or even next year instead of what revolutions and horrible killings are going on now. Games and TV, I feel, are just distractions from what matters and just dumbs kids down. Of course, I could be completely wrong, but thats how I see it.
We have a society that knows how to read and write but chooses not to.
(Sorry if I went a little off topic.)
So be a good person. Do what you can. Burn with the fire of youth, and I hope you are a pioneer for social change. But my point is that the kids your age don't know any better. I spent a lot of time drinking and now that time is done. It wasn't really wasted because I did other things too that were worthwhile and made me happy. Even the drinking helped me cope with my energies until the drinking itself became the problem and I dropped it which was hard, so I don't recommend starting. Personally I started to fit in with friends because I was lonely.
Um... the only negative effect I get from following world news, politics, religion, etc, is knowing that many of my fellow humans are either retarded or batshit crazy.
Pretty impressive, MG! But studies have shown that some people shown violent films will imitate what they see on film. One study was done back in the 1980's, where people were shown a violent movie in a theater, and afterwards, some vandalism had been done to one of the fixtures in the theater. Stuff got trashed. Probably not everyone is as smart, good-natured, and/or independent-thinking as you.