Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

I follow Islam, Hinduism, Christianity, and Buddhism

betaboybetaboy Veteran
edited September 2011 in Faith & Religion
Namaste/Salam/Shalom ;)

I kind of follow all these religions. I believe that all humans are evil, conceived in sin (Christianity), and that Buddhism is a skillful method of suppressing that evil. I also believe, as many Islamic fatalists (and the Hindu bhagwat gita) do, that what will be, will be - and that the results are not in our hands. Everything is predetermined, whether by God or by preceding causes in the long chain of cause and effect.

So there you have it - four religions.

BB
«1

Comments

  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    That's some self-contradictory mish-mash.
    I think your mind needs sorting, personally....
  • I kind of follow all these religions.
    "Kind of." But not really... "Mish-mash" does seem to be a good description.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited September 2011
    Namaste/Salam/Shalom ;)

    I kind of follow all these religions. I believe that all humans are evil, conceived in sin (Christianity), and that Buddhism is a skillful method of suppressing that evil. I also believe, as many Islamic fatalists (and the Hindu bhagwat gita) do, that what will be, will be - and that the results are not in our hands. Everything is predetermined, whether by God or by preceding causes in the long chain of cause and effect.

    So there you have it - four religions.

    BB
    Buddhism isn't out to supress evil. It's out to transcend suffering.
    If results are not in our hands, then we will always be evil.
    It's either God, or the Cause and effect.
    It can't be both.
    Take your pick, plant your mast and be decisive.
    Religion is not a pick 'n' mix of "I like this, but ain't so keen on that...."

    Prevarication is the sign of an unsettled Mind with no grounding.
    I speak from experience, you see.

    never have I been so miserable or confused, as when I tried to accommodate all masters, and found myself an unworthy servant to all of them.
    If you cannot follow one path decisively, then you will forever be caught in a whirling maelstrom of confusion.

    "He who deliberates fully before taking each step will forever spend his life on one leg".

    Hop to it, soldier.



  • With all the respect and love that I owe to Fede, the above are only personal opinions, however absolutely they may be expressed.

    @Fede, you may have been miserable and confused but some of us have found peace, light and love in the ground we share, at the deepest level. It is not prevarication to understand that all 'good news', dharmas, etc. are only shadows in a mirror, darkly glimpsed.
  • Namaste/Salam/Shalom ;)

    I kind of follow all these religions. I believe that all humans are evil, conceived in sin (Christianity), and that Buddhism is a skillful method of suppressing that evil. I also believe, as many Islamic fatalists (and the Hindu bhagwat gita) do, that what will be, will be - and that the results are not in our hands. Everything is predetermined, whether by God or by preceding causes in the long chain of cause and effect.

    So there you have it - four religions.

    BB
    Sorry, but the Unitarian Universalists have already done it, and made their own religion out of it.
  • Ever heard the old phrase "You can't have your cake and eat it too"?? Picking and choosing is fine, but I think it totally misses the point of each of those religions. Many of the things you stated are pretty much mutually exclusive of one another.
  • The more and more i study the various religions the more and more i see the main differences. All religions except buddhism project insecurity of death, whereas buddhism comes in harmony with it. All others grasp at something, whereas buddhism grasps at nowhere. Oh also throw the human element into the mix and that basically throws the biggest curve ball. Though i can see what you are getting. There are underlying themes but it is too filtered for the average joes consciousness.

    Good luck!
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    What's wrong with finding wisdom wherever it is?
  • genkakugenkaku Northampton, Mass. U.S.A. Veteran
    Namaste/Salam/Shalom ;)

    I kind of follow all these religions. I believe that all humans are evil, conceived in sin (Christianity), and that Buddhism is a skillful method of suppressing that evil. I also believe, as many Islamic fatalists (and the Hindu bhagwat gita) do, that what will be, will be - and that the results are not in our hands. Everything is predetermined, whether by God or by preceding causes in the long chain of cause and effect.

    So there you have it - four religions.

    BB
    @betaboy -- Anyone is free to believe anything they like. The question is, do such beliefs instill an honest peace in the believer or is s/he constantly fidgeting around, papering over and propping up those beliefs as the flaws are made evident in daily life?

    When it comes to an honest peace, beliefs are limited, tentative. This is not to say they are bad or naughty or stupid: Beliefs can instill a willingness to take action and that action can be very nourishing. But as spiritual practice gains ground, beliefs are transmuted into experience -- and experience trumps belief every time because experience is not limited.

    The best thing anyone can do with belief is to really dig in -- really study and then put that study into an actual-factual practice. In this way, an honest peace can take shape and we can all go about our business.

    Best wishes.
  • I think the only difference amongst various religions is about the manner of meditation. Hindus do it through chanting of mantras or names of gods, singing of religious songs and so, Muslims do it through offering Namaz, Sikhs do it through chanting of 'Wahe Guru', Christians do it through prayer, Buddhists do it through watching the breath. Of course, different religions have used different stories and methods to motivate their followers to meditate.
  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    You cant follow 4 religions because you inevitably pick and choose bits from them to suit you so your not following them but rather changing them according to your own needs something with which if a creator god existed would be certainly pissed at you for disobeying. @Federica hit the nail on the head as did @Cinorjer and @mountains.

  • @betaboy Understand the concept of non-dualism and then re-evaluate.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Thinking more about the OP, if the OP thinks he is "following" all those religions, he's not. If he thinks he is finding some wisdom in each of those religions, that is very possible, and even commendable. After all, Buddha didn't just follow the established religions of his day. He sought out wisdom.
  • That is true the Unitarian Universalists have been doing it for 50 years now.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    With all the respect and love that I owe to Fede, the above are only personal opinions, however absolutely they may be expressed.

    @Fede, you may have been miserable and confused but some of us have found peace, light and love in the ground we share, at the deepest level. It is not prevarication to understand that all 'good news', dharmas, etc. are only shadows in a mirror, darkly glimpsed.
    I completely equate with your understanding. What I take issue with is betaboy's assertion that one may take and studiously follow the teachings, but also blend them into a central tenet of one's own making.
    It's commendable.
    but not possible.....

  • Every religious founder grasped an aspect (or aspects) of the truth while missing the rest - Islam understood fatalism but missed out on karma (which Hinduism grasped correctly). Buddhism grasped the impermanence concept but failed to posit human nature (which Christianity did). And so on.

    So every religion has something to offer - something which other religions have missed. So let's learn from them all.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    No dispute there. You simply cannot hang one garment on different lines at once.
    That's the point we're making.....
  • Buddhism grasped the impermanence concept but failed to posit human nature (which Christianity did). And so on.
    Can you elaborate on this point please? What is that you mean by that?
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    No dispute there. You simply cannot hang one garment on different lines at once.
    That's the point we're making.....
    Actually when I was a kid and my grandmother hung the laundry out on the line, she often hung the garments from one line to another, instead of on just one line, depending on the wind direction that particular day.

  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    Every religious founder grasped an aspect (or aspects) of the truth while missing the rest - Islam understood fatalism but missed out on karma (which Hinduism grasped correctly). Buddhism grasped the impermanence concept but failed to posit human nature (which Christianity did). And so on.

    So every religion has something to offer - something which other religions have missed. So let's learn from them all.
    And what do tell is human nature ?
  • @betaboy - perhaps you could rotate them. For example, Islam on Monday, Christianity on Tuesday, Hinduism on Wednesday, Buddhism on Thursday, Sikhism on Friday, Paganism on Saturday and whatever you feel like on Sunday. I think this would be a great way for you to get the best out of all worlds and it means that, when you die, you will be less likely to have got it wrong.

    Let us know how you get on if you decide to follow this method.
  • No dispute there. You simply cannot hang one garment on different lines at once.
    That's the point we're making.....
    Actually when I was a kid and my grandmother hung the laundry out on the line, she often hung the garments from one line to another, instead of on just one line, depending on the wind direction that particular day.

    so we're arguing the validity of figurative language? Lol.

  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    No dispute there. You simply cannot hang one garment on different lines at once.
    That's the point we're making.....
    Actually when I was a kid and my grandmother hung the laundry out on the line, she often hung the garments from one line to another, instead of on just one line, depending on the wind direction that particular day.

    so we're arguing the validity of figurative language? Lol.

    If you make your point using figurative language, then your figurative language ought to be correct, otherwise you risk making the point against your own position.

    OR, maybe I was just injecting a little humor.

  • Hmmmm

    I think that when one looks past language, culture and metaphor one can find a great deal of commonality in the worlds religions. Certainly it is not difficult to find many parallels in Hinduism and Buddhism.
    I've said it before, I think in many ways religion is like music...each culture and epoch has it's own that speaks to it, but it all serves the same purpose.

    That said, it seems like (at least in a couple posts in this thread) the OP is reducing the teachings of each religion into a phrase or two and therefore obviously missing out on the vast vast majority of what each religion teaches.

    It might seem self serving, but I think you (the OP) should maybe look into the teachings of Jodo Shinshu. Start by reading the Tannisho
    http://www.shinranworks.com/relatedworks/tannisho1.htm
    I think this form of Buddhism might speak to you.
  • I tend to think about religions like they are ice cream flavors.

    chocolate, vanilla, strawberry...

    Yeah they are all awesome, and you can't really say that any of them doesn't have a special kind of "tastiness" to it. But at one point most of us tend to realize that chocolate is actually better then the other ones, regardless of all of them tasting pretty great.
  • Religion, in its better light, is a spiritual discipline, not unlike learning a musical instrument. I don't mean playing so-so or being pretty good at playing an instrument. I'm talking like a classical performer who is always deepening their practice every day, learning their instrument intimately, inside and out, who are dedicated to that instrument. There are great classical musicians who still after decades of practice don't sit on their laurels, or arbitrarily decide to drop the piano so they can play the violin instead.

    That doesn't mean pianos are good and violins are bad, and it doesn't mean you can't learn some things from violinists. But concentration, dedication and hard work is what will distinguish the musician, not dividing his or her discipline by switching instruments. You can't play the piano like a violin. You can't play the violin like a clarinet. You can't play the clarinet like a snare drum.

    Certainly there are certain common ideas in many religions, but there are also differences. The common ideas may even be helpful for a specific discipline. But by ignoring the differences you do a disservice to all these religions in understanding them.
  • Leaving aside the analogies, all of which break down (not everyone likes or can tolerate chocolate, @mithril :)), and as what some have labelled 'universalist' (altho' I wouldn't know if that label fits), I would like to disassociate myself from the OP's original interpretation and attempt at synthesis, whilst entirely supporting the notion of a pluralist spirituality.

    As with those here who study and practise Buddhism, sincerely and with commitment, we 'pluralists' do too, if we are at all serious. Of course, there are the dilettantes, as there are within religions, political parties, science, etc., the people who see it as an easy option. After all, many have come to Buddhism as an easy way to happiness, misled often by the sort of semi-magical titles that even the soberest teachers use for their books, e.g TNH's subtitles. They soon learn that this is not an easy path and some wander off or trim their practice until there is nothing left. Precisely the same thing happens in Christianity, as witnessed on these boards time and again: some among us have tried Christianity or grown up with it and now find it wanting. What I have tried to avoid, as far as possible, is losing whatever is valuable in the various traditions and teachings. None of them, I have to admit, be they a Christ, a Buddha, a Prophet, a Republican, a Democrat, a capitalist, a communist, a Freudian, a Jungian or whatever, has seemed entirely satisfactory.

    Time and again, I have gone to the best teachers I could find, studied under them and persevered, and gained some 'qualifications' or recognition. As Omar Khayyam put it (yes, old friends here, it's that quotation again!)
    " Myself when young did eagerly frequent
    Doctor and Saint, and heard great Argument
    About it and about: but evermore
    Came out by the same Door as in I went."

    For years, I worried that this was unskillful arrogance and resistance - as many of those same teachers were swift to point out when I questioned their certainties and presuppositions. More recently, I have seen it as something else: by accepting that I 'walk in a cloud of unknowing' is what I do and that, in that very acceptance is the peace that goes beyond what I imagined.

    From there, I can stand in awe and deep reverence in a cathedral or a mosque or a henge or simply in a garden. To finish this long ramble with an analogy, however limited, consider the garden. I have some trees, many flowers, a couple of ponds, grasses, shrubs. If I only grew one sort of plant, it would not be gardening, it would be horticulture. I am very grateful to those who do specialise deeply and bring new cultivars to market. I don't want to be one of them, I want to go on having a pleasure, not a market, garden.
  • Religion, in its better light, is a spiritual discipline, not unlike learning a musical instrument. I don't mean playing so-so or being pretty good at playing an instrument. I'm talking like a classical performer who is always deepening their practice every day, learning their instrument intimately, inside and out, who are dedicated to that instrument. There are great classical musicians who still after decades of practice don't sit on their laurels, or arbitrarily decide to drop the piano so they can play the violin instead.

    That doesn't mean pianos are good and violins are bad, and it doesn't mean you can't learn some things from violinists. But concentration, dedication and hard work is what will distinguish the musician, not dividing his or her discipline by switching instruments. You can't play the piano like a violin. You can't play the violin like a clarinet. You can't play the clarinet like a snare drum.
    An image I have often used, @riverflow, when I need to remind myself of the role of practice.

    It does strike me that I have rarely come across, say, a flautist who might want to exterminate all tympanists. An orchestra is made up of many different instruments, a choir many voices, working together and co-operating. So unlike the home-life of so many of our dear old world religions.
    Certainly there are certain common ideas in many religions, but there are also differences. The common ideas may even be helpful for a specific discipline. But by ignoring the differences you do a disservice to all these religions in understanding them.
    I do agree that we cannot simply stop on the ground we share. We have to dare to go into the places where we disagree and to walk into the Shadow places. Perhaps we have to accept our Christ-nature and harrow Hell. As Rilke warns us, angels which are refused in our hearts will return as demons.



  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    You cannot be a Christian and a Muslim, unless you are a Unitarian Christian or something like that.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    It would be quite a challenge, but when I read the first part of the Koran, I was quite surprised at how closely it followed the Old Testament.

    But, Mindgate -- who said?
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    Muslims.

    Say: He is Allah, He is One; The Self-Sufficient,
    The Eternal God; He begets not,
    nor was He begotten;
    There is none equal to Him.

    [The Holy Qur'an, Surah 112:1-4]

    Jesus is not his son. Jesus is not Him. God is God and Jesus was just a human. To believe Jesus is God means you are NOT a Muslim. This belief is as much important to Muslims as the 4 Noble Truths is to Buddhists.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Oh. Well I thought the general belief on this forum is that it is up to the individual to decide what he or she was. But I guess that concept is reserved for Buddhists only. Sorry, I didn't know that was our rule here.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    If you call yourself a Muslim, then you must follow Muslim beliefs.

    I could say I was 57 years old. I could say that I'm Australian. I could say that I follow Native American religions.

    I could say all that and decide that I am those things - but the simple fact is, if I am not those things, then I am not those things!

    If a Muslim says they are a Muslim without holding Muslim beliefs, then they aren't a Muslim! Simple as that. If the OP wants to say they are a Muslim, they can do that. But if they aren't a Muslim, then I'm allowed to tell them so.

    ... :banghead:
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    If the OP wants to say they are a Muslim, they can do that. But if they aren't a Muslim, then I'm allowed to tell them so.

    ... :banghead:
    Hmmmm...when you're done banging your head against the wall, consider this: I think the OP gets to self-label himself whatever he wants, just as you self-label yourself a Buddhist. I don't think you can determine his entire belief system after only 82 words. Weren't you the one who wrote, "'I'm not a big fan of all these "What makes you a Buddhist' [threads]"? And I agree. But I think that same principle is due people of other faiths, as well...in fact, if it doesn't, then it's not a principle. For example, I wouldn't presume to say you're not a Buddhist. And does a Muslim have to believe 100% of the Koran, or he's not a Muslim? Can he find some wisdom in more than one world religion?

    Now, having said all that, I believe the OP didn't express himself well at all. But I'm willing to be a little open-minded about his mindset.

  • @vinlyn and @MindGate:

    Do either of you actually know any Muslims personally?

  • You cannot be a Christian and a Muslim, unless you are a Unitarian Christian or something like that.
    Ah, the old question arises, what does it mean to be a Christian, or Muslim, or Buddhist.

    I have a soft spot for UUs (Unitarian Universalists) and for some years I was one and my first Zen meditation teacher was a UU minister. But Lordy how they could talk something to death! To be a UUer was to be a humanist, and beyond that, everyone was doing their own thing, and that thing was arguing mostly and getting involved in various causes. The lack of focus eventually caused me to concentrate on a Buddhist practice. The UUers were a fine bunch of people, but their motto "To question is the answer." is flawed. Eventually you have to find answers, and not every answer is equally valid.

    But I digress. You may of course find much to admire in any religious teaching or practice. But, a religion isn't just a set of observations about life, humanity, or God for that matter. People who claim to be all things end up being nothing in particular. It's all about fear, really. People are afraid of losing their individuality and freedom. In order to transform your life and give it meaning, you have to overcome this fear at some point. At the heart of each religious practice is a sacrifice of some sort.

    You may call yourself a Buddhist or whatever. But unless you take refuge in the Buddha, the Sangha, and the Dharma, and focus on this, you're not really taking advantage of this particular life transforming practice. I think it must be the same with the other religions.

    My two cents worth.



  • I Personally believe in that there are truths in all Religions and leave it at that.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    @vinlyn and @MindGate:

    Do either of you actually know any Muslims personally?

    Yes, many. My adopted son from Pakistan is an adult Muslim. For two years I lived with my son and his wife (also Muslim) and have gone to mosque with them (as an observer). I know MANY of his friends and have attended large Pakistani parties with them, as well as holidays and other social occasions at their homes. Additionally, the school in which I was principal had about 5% Muslim, and I was often invited to Muslim celebrations such as the one during Eid. I have visited mosques in Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and Jakarta.

  • @vinlyn - wow, that's a LOT of experience!
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    @vinlyn

    To be a Muslim, you have to AT LEAST believe the basis for which the Muslim belief system is grounded in - and you can't do that if you believe Jesus is God too. I'm sorry. That's a fact. A VAST majority of Muslims would agree. Go to some Islam chatroom. You can ask. To officially convert to Islam is to say that you believe "there is one, single, God (not Jesus)" to an Imam.

    You can label yourself whatever the Hell you want, but if you aren't what you say you are, then you're wrong. If you label a jar of applesauce as "strawberry jelly," then you're wrong! You can do that. Sure, go ahead, but its not true.

    You can agree with some parts of the Qur'an, but unless you believe the BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR WHICH ISLAM WAS FOUNDED ON, then you are NOT a Muslim by definition.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    edited September 2011
    @vinlyn

    To be a Muslim, you have to AT LEAST believe the basis for which the Muslim belief system is grounded in - and you can't do that if you believe Jesus is God too. I'm sorry. That's a fact. A VAST majority of Muslims would agree. Go to some Islam chatroom. You can ask. To officially convert to Islam is to say that you believe "there is one, single, God (not Jesus)" to an Imam.

    You can label yourself whatever the Hell you want, but if you aren't what you say you are, then you're wrong. If you label a jar of applesauce as "strawberry jelly," then you're wrong! You can do that. Sure, go ahead, but its not true.

    You can agree with some parts of the Qur'an, but unless you believe the BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR WHICH ISLAM WAS FOUNDED ON, then you are NOT a Muslim by definition.
    You just don't get the point.

    It's not up to YOU to say about any individual what their belief system is.

    It may be up to their church or mosque or synagogue or temple to say if they are formal members.

    But it is not up to "Mindgate" to say or define anything about another religion or another person. You're not the gatekeeper. In the case of theistic religions, it's up to the individual and God. Not "Mindgate".

  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    You don't get the point. Look up the basic definition of Muslim. If the OP does not follow that description, they are not a Muslim. If applesauce is has the characteristics of applesauce, then it is applesauce. If a Muslim has the beliefs of a Muslim, they are a Muslim. If not, then they are something else.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    Its not up to me to define a religion - its up to the founder. And Muhammad has told us specifically what a Muslim is. If they don't follow the beliefs of Islam, they are not a Muslim. They can call themselves whatever on God's green earth they want to call themselves, but if they don't fit the description of what a Muslim actually is, by definition, they are not a Muslim.

    They could be some offshoot of Islam, but not an actual Muslim.
  • Ah, pointless debate - one of the things I love about internet forums. :clap:
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    Ah, pointless debate - one of the things I love about internet forums. :clap:
    :thumbsup:
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Ah, pointless debate - one of the things I love about internet forums. :clap:
    Well, I don't really think it's pointless.

    It has to do with:
    1. intellectual freedom
    2. making personal choices
    3. a person of one religion telling a person of another religion that he or she is or isn't entitled to call himself or herself a member of a religion

    Those are some of the points.

    If tonight MindGate goes out and has a beer with the boys, do I get to tell him he's not a Buddhist? I don't think so.

  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    No, no, you get to tell me I'm an unenlightened Buddhist (assuming I attempt to follow the Buddha's teachings and believe they are the way to end suffering), vinlyn.
  • They can call themselves whatever on God's green earth they want to call themselves, but if they don't fit the description of what a Muslim actually is, by definition, they are not a Muslim.
    To arbitrarily define oneself as something that does not even resemble the religious practice and belief is intellectually dishonest to be sure.

    This is not the same thing as pointing to certain areas of all these religions what they do hold in common but articulate differently (as Huxley did in The Perennial Philosophy, for example). It merely begs the question: WHY would someone feel the need to claim they are a Muslim, a Buddhist, a Christian and a Hindu?

  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    No, no, you get to tell me I'm an unenlightened Buddhist (assuming I attempt to follow the Buddha's teachings and believe they are the way to end suffering), vinlyn.
    One thing I have been trying to accomplish in my practice is to realize when I have reached the point on internet forums when further discussion with an individual will be fruitless. I have said what I have to say and I stand by it. And so I have reached a point of conclusion with you in this thread.

  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited September 2011
    No, no, you get to tell me I'm an unenlightened Buddhist (assuming I attempt to follow the Buddha's teachings and believe they are the way to end suffering), vinlyn.
    One thing I have been trying to accomplish in my practice is to realize when I have reached the point on internet forums when further discussion with an individual will be fruitless. I have said what I have to say and I stand by it. And so I have reached a point of conclusion with you in this thread.

    k
Sign In or Register to comment.