Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
In your opinion, does the path of self-knowledge through experience leads to the same realization as concentrated effort through meditation?
0
Comments
The difficulty lies in the willingness to realize/actualize what is already a fact.
The number of older and more experienced people who are, in fact, at peace in their lives is far from enormous, so simply getting older and gaining experience does not seem to be an adequate tool to guarantee something called "realization."
Simultaneously, even people with long and determined meditation under their belt can miss their own mark and remain in a world of fidgeting and fussing ... with a 'spiritual' overlay. It may all look pretty good, but the dime hasn't dropped. No guarantees in this realm either.
So, if it is possible to fail through hard-won experience and it is possible to fail through hard-won meditation practice, which course is best if anyone wants to be at peace?
My vote is for any format that causes a person to reflect deeply, to focus the mind without interruption, and to pay attention where attention has been lacking. Meditation is a good format, but the only way of knowing that is to try it ... and keep trying it ... while leaving failure and success to less focused individuals. There is no guarantee ...
Or rather, you are the guarantee ...
You just don't know it yet.
PS. The Zen student Christmas Humphreys once wrote approximately, "All roads lead to Rome, but you take your road and I take mine. When we get there, we can both laugh."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_on_meditation
The road the Buddha suggested is the 8-fold path, which is balanced practice including all facets of life. Meditation inside and outside of a sitting posture is certainly a part of that.
I'm trying to express my state of mind as clearly as possible and am finding it quite difficult. I apologize if I am vague or confusing.
Perhaps it may be helpful to consider what kind of person you would like to be, and what do you hope to get out of Buddhism. Likewise what do you get out recreational drug use, and how long are those things likely to last? What does living life to the fullest really mean, and are things like drugs and casual sex really necessary to live a full life?
Sometimes the middle way refers to the middle way between eternalism and nihilism. I'm not sure that's relevant in your question.
I practiced Buddhism for 5 years even though I lived with a 'woman in distress' who drank a lot and kind of a party life. For me though I was not into the drinking much. The party and the woman helped energize me and I wasn't on a high enough dose of meds so I was basically in some state of mania most of the time. Now I am on a LOT of drugs prescription to combat voices and I am very sedated. But I am more spacious of mind not being lead into conflicts and drama. I still do some sensual things like drink occasionally and smoking tobacco in a pipe. What I have found is that you can use sense pleasures to observe what happens in your mind. I read a book when I was young called "Chocolate to Morphine" by Andrew Weil. It's about drugs from a doctor who travels around to tribes and studies the effects of drugs on the people. It has a kind of liberal vibe, but it makes the point that relationships to drugs are not the same for all people. The same drug can really eff up some people due to how they relate to it and the set of their psychology and the setting of their life (right action, right speach, right livelyhood perhaps).
Buddhism and meditation have been a way for to gain another kind of knowledge about myself and the world around me, yet I fail to see how it over-archs other type of knowledge deriving from other types of experiences. I am not talking about indulging in drugs every day here, but merely enjoying a drunken night on red wine once in while and getting in touch with another part of myself...
Buddhism does not lead to Rome, it allows a settling outside of duality.
http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/archives/advanced/mahamudra/karma_kagyu_mm/milarepa_realize_true_nature_mind.html
Perhaps it gets harder but we don't mind so much . . .
Do you have another route?
Intensity is good. Wishy washy new agers have little chance of success, until they develop a little chutzpah. Fanatical Buddhism is not always fashionable even amongst some sanghas. Just as some Muslims are of the opinion that Jihad is an external rather than internal war.
The Middle Way is balanced, moderating but all consuming.
Easy things can be said. Hard path has to be embraced fully. We all know that.
"Live contemplating the body. Contemplate internally and externally. Contemplate the origination of things in the body. Contemplate the dissolution of things in the body."
- The Buddha
You sound like you'll do fine. Be kind to the fish (still having a few problems with that one myself) :wave:
My opinion is that joy is fleeting, whether it's experienced through drugs/sex or through altered mental states during meditation. Contentment with existing in the present moment, whatever physical/mental conditions that might entail, is how I see enlightenment manifesting.
To answer the OP question, whatever allows you to glimpse beyond the imaginary world your mind projects will help with realisation. Be it by letting go of the monologue through concentrating on breathing in meditation, or by gaining insight into how the mind interacts with the world through experience.
Suffering is optional. Time wasted in unenlightened being is like sleeping through the main event.
I did not become a Buddhist for relaxation. All my legs are paddling for the far shore.
. . . watch my wake