Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
what would The Buddha say or do if....
Let's say someone was being completely irrational and calling the Buddha names and it was more or less like talking to a wall. What would Buddha do or say in that situation? I don't think I've ever come across an example in any sutta that this happened. Does anybody know of an example?
0
Comments
What I imagine the Buddha would do, would be to stand quietly and attentively while the irrational person talked, yelled and carried on.... wait until the person was done ranting... then simply bow in respect... and walk away with thoughts of compassion for the irrational person - who must be in some sort of crisis and pain.
To do otherwise, just wouldn't make sense from the Buddha.
All of you Bhikshus, if a person dismembered you piece by piece your
mind should be self-contained. Do not allow yourself to become
angry. Moreover, you should guard your mouth and not give rise to
evil speech. If you allow yourself to have thoughts of anger, you
will hinder your own Way, and lose the merit and virtue you have
gained. Patience is a virtue which neither upholding the precepts
nor the ascetic practises are able to compare with. One who is able
to practise patience can be called a great person who has strength;
if you are unable to happily and patiently undergo the poison of
malicious abuse, as if drinking sweet dew, you cannot be called a
wise person who has entered the Way. Why is this? The harm from
anger ruins all good dharmas and destroys one's good reputation.
People of the present and of the future will not even wish to see
this person. You should know that a heart of anger is worse than a
fierce fire. You should always guard against it, and not allow it to
enter you, for of the thieves which rob one's merit and virtue, none
surpasses anger. Anger may be excusable in lay people who indulge in
desires, and in people who do not cultivate the Way, who are without
the means to restrain themselves, but for people who have left the
home-life, who cultivate the Way and are without desires, harboring
anger is impermissable. Within a clear, cool cloud, there should not
be a sudden blazing clash of thunder.
What would the Buddha do? What would you do if faced with an angry, out of control person? Try to help that person. What else is there to do?
The fine line between the divine and the mundane is illusory.
"I am one who has overcome all, who knows all, I am detached from all things; having abandonded everything, obtained emancipation, by the destruction of desire. Having by myself gained knowledge, whom should I call master?"
The Blessed One made known his status more emphatically as follows:
na me acariyo atthi
sadiso me na vijjati
sadevakasmim lokasmin
nathi me patipuggalo
"I have no teacher, One like me is not, in the world of men and gods, NONE is my counterpart"
majjhima nikaya 26
My teacher said perhaps not to give it food and it will blow itself out. Said differently, if we accept the whirlwind is impermanent but painful for the other, our spaciousness of mind doesn't collapse, and we can remain rooted and skillful... whereby the aggression they have been seduced by will not give rise to thoughts of "other" or "they" or possessing some quality of "anger"... rather a fruition of conditions that will change as the conditions change.
If that is unavailable, then we can just relate to the feelings. "You sound upset, how can I help?" Or "all that anger must be painful, how can I help?"
With warmth,
Matt
Ww,M
One like me is not, in the world of men and gods, NONE is my counterpart
In the theravada tradition even though a "ordinary" person can become an Arahat and reach enlightenment, The Buddha is said to be of the highest kind of being, even though still human.
It seems straight forward that he is saying his "status" is above all others. In some other traditions they talk about very special marks and qualities only Buddha has.
(yes im getting off topic from the post, one thing leads to another)
We all like to have heroes, but the pedestals we're apt to put them on aren't helpful. The only difference between those who are heroes and those who are not are that heroes take it upon themselves as a sacred duty to be the manifestation of the qualities they respect.
With warmth,
Matt
Truth is, The Buddha is my hero. I am so thankful for who he was, did, for laying out the road map for us and everything. I link myself to the theravada tradition and in our cannon it is said that there was a number of Buddhas who came before Gottama but they didn't want to teach the dhamma!!
So, The Buddha is very special to me.