Thanks for that! It's interesting to see so many variations of the chants. I do this one every day and with the Sangha on Sundays. It's taking some time getting the rythm, pronounciation and pitch right. I don't have it completely memorized yet but it's a progressive practice. It looks to me like you have the pronounciation down but it is hard to tell exactly without hearing it. Also, some traditions and schools will do it a bit differently.
This is the version I do.
"Na-mo rat-na tra-ya-ya
Nam-ah ar-ya av-a-lo-ki-tes-va-ra-ya
Bod-hi-satt-va-ya
Ma-ha-satt-va-ya
Ma-ha-ka-ru-ni-ka-ya
Om sa-ba-la-va-ti su-dha-na-tas-ya na-mas
kri-va-ni-mam ar-ya av-a-lo-ki-tes-va-ra
lam-tab-ha na-mo ni-la-kant-ha sri-ma-ha-pa-ta-sa-mi sar-va-to-dhu-su-phem a-si-yum sar-va-sa-da na-ma bha-ga mab-ha-te-tu tad-yat-ha
Om a-va-lo-ki lo-ka-te ka-la-ti es-i-li
ma-ha-bod-hi-satt-va sab-ho sab-ho ma-ra
ma-ra ma-si ma-si rid-ha-yum gu-ru gu-ru
ga-mam tu-ru tu-ru bha-si-ya-ti ma-ha bha-si-ya-ti
dha-ra dha-ra dhi-ri-ni sva-ra-ya ja-la ja-la
ma-ma bha-ma-ra mu-dhi-li ed-hye-hi s-in-a
si-na a-la-sim bha-la-sa-ri bha-sa bha-sim
bha-ra-sa-ya hu-lu hu-lu pra hu-lu hu-lu sri
sa-ra sa-ra si-ri si-ri su-ru su-ru bud-hi bud-hi
bud-ha-ya bud-ha-ya mai-tri-ye ni-la-kant-ha
tri-sa-ra-na bha-ya-ma-na sva-ha
Sit-a-ya svaha
Ma-ha sit-ay-a sva-ha
Si-ta-ya-ye sva-ra-ya sva-ha
Ni-la-kan-thi sva-ha
Pra-ni-la sva-ha
Sri sid-ha muk-ha-ya sva-ha
Sar-va ma-ha as-ta-ya sva-ha
Ca-kra as-ta-ya sva-ha
Pad-ma ke-sa-ya sva-ha
Ni-la-kant-he pan-ta-la-ya sva-ha
Mob-ho-li-san-ka-ra-ye sva-ha
Na-mo rat-na tra-ya-ya
Nam-ah ar-ya a-va-lo-ki-ta is-var-a-ya sva-ha
Om sid-hyan-tu man-tra pa-ta-ye sva-ha"
My teacher doesn't really put herself "out there" so I can't share the video I have for audio.
What makes me sad about them is that there a genuine problems that men and boys face and the way they weaponize them and turn it into misogyny turns people away from looking at and addressing those problems. For example in education outcomes the gender inequality is worse than it was in the 70s only the genders have swapped in terms of who's doing better and who's falling behind. The people on top of society are still more likely to be men, but the people at the bottom of society are also more likely to be men. More homelessness, greater rates of suicide deaths.
Richard Reeves is a good example of someone who is able to talk about men's issues without the red pill nonsense.
person
I recently noticed some new kinds of links appearing in my YouTube feed, interviews with people like Jordan Peterson and Rollo Tomassi. I innocently thought I would have a look since it mentioned some kind of Red Pill, a reference to ‘The Matrix’. I found the interview indigestible and instead had a look on Wikipedia what it’s all about… I read the pages on “Red pill”, “Manosphere” and “alt-right pipeline” before getting thoroughly sick of it.
It seems there are quite a few influencers out there who are trying to convince people to move to the right in their politics, and who seem to be convinced that men are being discriminated against, strange as it may seem. Anti-women sentiments run rampant in this group. I find it quite worrying that these people seem to have a wide reach on YouTube to suck in folks who don’t know any better.
Now I know many Buddhist groups are still men-first, and have a ways to go in terms of gender equality, but at least they are not moving in the wrong direction! This whole process of using the internet to radicalise especially young people seems to me to be something to beware of.
Jeroen
Trump's "Save America" act would be a first step to ending women's vote. The act requires documentary proof of citizenship, and if one's married name doesn't agree with the name on their birth certificate, they don't have that. Presumably women could get around this by providing documentation of the name change, but this would be very difficult for some women. Not everybody has a copy of their birth and marriage certificates, and it can be quite difficult for some people to obtain them.
Their is a faction of MAGA that doesn't believe women should vote, especially married women, whose husbands should speak for them. They are quite open about this.
zorro
I came across this very interesting author, poet and activist named Wendell Berry on YouTube, who died on the 31st of August, 2026. He was in favour of agricultural communities and small farms, and against industrial agriculture, which he saw as an outflow of the World War 2 industrial and chemical business. He was a prolific writer, Berry wrote at least twenty-five books (or chapbooks) of poems, twenty-four volumes of essays, and fifteen novels and short story collections.
People called him a poet and a prophet, and although he called himself a Christian “of a kind” he had a broad appeal, in his appreciation for the Earth, nature and mankind’s place within it. Some of the things he wrote were rather zennish. From Wikipedia…
According to Berry, the good life includes sustainable agriculture, appropriate technologies, healthy rural communities, connection to place, the pleasures of good food, animal husbandry, good work, local economics, the miracle of life, consistent life ethic, fidelity, frugality, reverence, and the interconnectedness of life. The threats Berry finds to this good simple life include: industrial farming and the industrialization of life, ignorance, hubris, greed, violence against others and against the natural world, the eroding topsoil in the United States, global economics, and environmental destruction.
“People use drugs, legal and illegal, because their lives are intolerably painful or dull. They hate their work and find no rest in their leisure. They are estranged from their families and their neighbors. It should tell us something that in healthy societies drug use is celebrative, convivial, and occasional, whereas among us it is lonely, shameful, and addictive. We need drugs, apparently, because we have lost each other.”
― Wendell Berry
“Thus, although we are not slaves in name, and cannot be carried to market and sold as somebody else's legal chattels, we are free only within narrow limits. For all our talk about liberation and personal autonomy, there are few choices that we are free to make. What would be the point, for example, if a majority of our people decided to be self-employed?
The great enemy of freedom is the alignment of political power with wealth. This alignment destroys the commonwealth - that is, the natural wealth of localities and the local economies of household, neighborhood, and community - and so destroys democracy, of which the commonwealth is the foundation and practical means.”
― Wendell Berry
“Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy.”
― Wendell Berry
“So, friends, every day do something that won't compute...Give your approval to all you cannot understand...Ask the questions that have no answers. Put your faith in two inches of humus that will build under the trees every thousand years...Laugh. Be joyful though you have considered all the facts...Practice resurrection.”
― Wendell Berry
Jeroen
@Jeroen said:
I came across this heart-warming documentary about the turnaround of Waterstones (and in the USA Barnes and Noble by the same man), really made my day to hear about the way bookstores are surviving on the high street.
An update on James Daunt’s efforts to apply the philosophy to the US giant bookstore Barnes and Noble. They are opening quite a few new bookstores, that’s a good sign.
Jeroen
It's a much better thought experiment than a show. But I'm glad it was made, will tune in for season 2. It reminds me of a webcomic I've read (2/3 of, because that was available for free). It's called Righteous and it's about a "virus" that's basically kindness, so when it changes the life of a selfish corporate man and he starts spreading it, the world seem to become a better place. Now, I was constantly expecting for something to go wrong, after all it's about the elimination of free will, but apparently the author felt we'd be better off without it.
Still, it was a captivating read, might finish it up sometime. For now, I'm just watching Slow Horses on Apple, I enjoy it a lot, always looking forward to a day off when I can grind through the next season.
RobinH
In my experience with depression I have found walking meditation a little better than sitting when I am having symptoms.
During psychosis sometimes I stop meditating altogether out of worry to make the mind that is already having to much energy to increase. During these I cease meditating and then restart when my symptoms cease.
Jeffrey
@Jeroen said:
@person said:
In the more traditional circles I'm familiar with they don't just drop people into meditation. There's lots of study to understand the view, lots of preliminary practices. And to do long, solo retreats its way more of that.Yes, when I was studying at the Tibetan Gelug temple near my home I also heard that they had a long preparatory trajectory before they would encourage people to learn meditation. This was with the Dalai Lama’s school of Buddhism, not all Tibetan schools share this approach as you probably know with your background in Tibetan Buddhism.
Yeah, they aren't all the same in approach, but they all have some degree of preliminary practice like study or prostrations. And the lay population doesn't really meditate at all.
Zen is fairly meditation forward. But my overall point was that the way meditation is treated in the west today is a new development, different from how it has been treated traditionally.
In the modern context, when I've looked at 3-10 day retreats they usually do mention caution around pre existing mental health issues.
That’s true, but the article goes further than that. They say people with high degrees of anxiety (not even clinically diagnosed), large amounts of neuroticism and so on need to be aware. It’s an attempt to classify people into at-risk groups using ordinary behaviour as a pointer to what might emerge during a meditation retreat, but not in a scientifically sound manner.
I think it’s more that people view meditation as a “health hack” for improved calmness, mental resilience and so on. It is marketed that way, in the States especially, with as a consequence that people buy a book and start experimenting at home. Which is harmless and beneficial for short stretches of half an hour, but when you go over the top and do three hours multiple times a week you might run into some of these unexpected side effects.
Then you are essentially stuck because you have no support, no knowledgeable teacher to call a halt to your experimentation. Although it has to be said that even if you had a teacher you might run into the “the cure for bad meditation is more meditation” attitude, which is so prevalent that they even mention it in the article.
Yeah, I think that's kind of where we are today. Its oversold, it lacks the traditional support framing and personal guidance.
I felt for Willoughby's experience of rejection and denial from some in the community for speaking up.
person
ty person for addressing this. the western world have to take the whole practice.without the foundation of ethics and wise seeing our mind body needs a sure ground of being of right intention to insee the mind body complex. without sila/ethics and prajna/wisdom doing effort mindfulness and concentration or western meditation leads to a mind crack.
that is why step 6 to 8 is for prepared mind to focus on the path of sila and wisdom. if people dont have their mind body prepared psychosis may fracture reality;
the buddha in his wisdom prapared his followers on the grounds of reality to be less dukkha in how you live the steps 1 to 5 , right view, right intention, right speech, right action and right livelyhood before you refine your mind to nirvana.
its a caution you cant bypass the steps in the buddha dharma , foundation first then mind studying of 6to 8 noble path.